Parafoveal processing of inflectional morphology on Russian nouns

References

• Akhutina, T., Kurgansky, A., Kurganskaya, M., Polinsky, M., Polonskaya, N., Larina, O., … Appelbaum, M. (2001). Processing of grammatical gender in normal and aphasic speakers of Russian. Cortex, 37(3), 295–326. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70576-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., & Rayner, K. (2004). Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 391–426. doi:10.1080/01690960344000233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Rayner, K. (2006). Vowel processing during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 416–424. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avrutin, S. (2000). Comprehension of discourse-linked and non-discourse-linked questions by children and Broca’s aphasics. Language and the Brain: Representation and Processing, 295–313. doi:10.1016/B978-012304260-6/50017-7
   Google Scholar
• Avrutin, S. (2006). Weak syntax. In Y. Grodzinsky & K. Amunts (Eds.), Broca’s region (pp. 49–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babyonyshev, M. A. (1996). Structural connections in syntax and processing: Studies in Russian and Japanese. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (accession order no. AAT 0597932).
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Pollatzek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version, 1(7).
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2007). The interplay between parafoveal preview and morphological processing in reading. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 391–407). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bivon, R. (1971). Element order (Studies in the modern Russian language, 7). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Oxford: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 209–217. doi:10.1037/h0087476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e62. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1500031X,e62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, V. P., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170–187. doi:10.1002/hbm.460020306
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, B., Stone, G., & Polinsky, M. (1996). The Russian language in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 415–422. doi:10.3758/BF03196500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence form Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371. doi:10.1080/01690960444000115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragoy, O., & Bastiaanse, R. (2013). Aspects of time: Time reference and aspect production in Russian aphasic speakers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(1), 113–128. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamic model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., Babyonyshev, M., & Gibson, E. (2004). The nature of case reference in on-line sentence processing in Russian. NELS 34 conference proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons, G., & Drieghe, D. (2011). The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 736–741. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0105-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans: A framework for defining “early” visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139–150. doi:10.1007/s00221-001-0906-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagarina, N. (2004). Does the acquisition of aspect have anything to do with aspectual pairs. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 33, 39–61. Retrieved from http://www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/fileadmin/material/ZASPiL_Volltexte/zp33/zaspil33-gagarina.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huey, E. B. (1908/1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hutzler, F., Fuchs, I., Gagl, B., Schuster, S., Richlan, F., Braun, M., & Hawelka, S. (2013). Parafoveal x-masks interfere with foveal word recognition: Evidence from fixation-related brain potentials. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 33. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00033
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyöna, J., Bertram, R., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study. Memory and Cognition, 32, 523–532. doi:10.3758/BF03195844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209–229. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L. (2007). The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W.S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 425–440). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kambe, G. (2004). Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 279–292. doi:10.3758/BF03194879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempe, V., & McWhinney, B. (1999). Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 129–171. doi:10.1080/016909699386329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., Radach, R., & Vorstius, C. (2012). Eye movements and parafoveal processing during reading in Korean. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1053–1078. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9349-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, T. H. (1995). Configuring topic and focus in Russian. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Hohenstein, S., Yan, M., & McDonald, S. A. (2013). How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 581–600. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.658073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, S. D. (1987). Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 84–99. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90064-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobanova, A. (2011). The role of prominence scales for the disambiguation of grammatical functions in Russian. Russian Linguistics, 35, 125–142. doi:10.1007/s11185-010-9066-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2016). Is prediction a viable comprehension strategy in reading? Cognitive Psychology, 88, 22–60. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, C., Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., & Hutzler, F. (2015). An incremental boundary study on parafoveal preprocessing in children reading aloud: Parafoveal masks overestimate the preview benefit. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 549–561. doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1008494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899–917. doi:10.1037/h0037368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazuka, R., & Lust, B. (1990). Language processing and language acquisition (pp. 163–205). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 221–224. doi:10.3758/BF03202990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K . (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 148–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. J. (1987). Malay (Indonesian and Malaysian). In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world’s major languages (pp. 913–935). London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206–226. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90009-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115–119. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). Neurophysiological constraints on the eye-mind link. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00361
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1–21. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n+1 during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(2), 653–668. doi:10.1037/a0034997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 5–35. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R. (2013). Synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 619–633. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., & Jia, A. (2016). Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi:10.1037/xml0000281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Lee, M., Reiderman, M., & Rayner, K. (2015). The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 118–139. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., & Leinenger, M. (2016). Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(12), 2039–2067. doi:10.1037/xhp0000270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2014). Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 309–333. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.873508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slioussar, N. (2011). Processing of a free word order language: The role of syntax and context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40, 291–306. doi:10.1007/s10936-011-9171-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1985). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Theoretical issues. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, S. (1998). The role of Aktionsart in the acquisition of Russian aspect. First Language, 18(54), 351–376. doi:10.1177/014272379801805405
   Google Scholar
• Stoops, A., Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2014). Animacy information outweighs morphological cues in Russian. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(5), 584–604. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.813560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(4), 745–765. doi:10.1080/02724980343000477
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454–461. doi:10.1162/08989290152001880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118(2), 141–156. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2015). Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 586–595. doi:10.1037/xlm0000039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winskel, H., & Salehuddin, K. (2014). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects when reading derived words in Malay. Kajian Malaysia, 32(2), 23–40. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/d4ee5d096b3370d7f2ef09465b67a608/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2032012
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Li, N., Wang, S., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2014). Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese. Visual Cognition, 22(2), 193–213. doi:10.1080/13506285.2014.890689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar