Effects of pictorial context reinstatement on correct and false recognition memory: insights from the simplified conjoint recognition paradigm

References

• Arndt, J. (2010). The role of memory activation in creating false memories of encoding context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 66–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection. Psychological Review, 89, 708–729. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.6.708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayen, U. J., & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2011). Influences of source–item contingency and schematic knowledge on source monitoring: Tests of the probability-matching account. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree symposium on cognition (pp. 313–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., Gomes, C. F. A., & Moran, R. (2014). The two recollections. Psychological Review, 121, 563–599. doi: 10.1037/a0037668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1998). When things that were never experienced are easier to “remember” than things that were. Psychological Science, 9, 484–489. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 164–169. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Kneer, R. (1995). False-recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 157–185. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review, 106, 160–179. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., Wright, R., & Mojardin, A. H. (2003). Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults. Psychological Review, 110, 762–784. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (2001). Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 307–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brédart, S. (2000). When false memories do not occur: Not thinking of the lure or remembering that it was not heard? Memory, 8, 123–128. doi: 10.1080/096582100387669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröder, A., & Meiser, T. (2007). Measuring source memory. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215, 52–60. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.215.1.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, D., Phillips-Grant, K., Conrad, N., & Bona, S. (2004). Encoding context and false recognition memories. Memory, 12, 562–570. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro, P., Fernandez, A., & Dias, A. R. (2009). The influence of theme identifiability on false memories: Evidence for age-dependent opposite effects. Memory & Cognition, 37, 115–129. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.2.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro, P., Fernandez, A., Diez, E., Garcia-Marques, L., Ramos, T., & Ferreira, M. B. (2012). “Identify-to-reject”: A specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 40, 252–265. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0152-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, P. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition. Memory & Cognition, 21, 223–234. doi: 10.3758/BF03202735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22. doi: 10.1037/h0046671
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dodson, C. S. (2007). Retrieval-based illusory recollections: Why study-test contextual changes impair source memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1211–1221. doi: 10.3758/BF03193595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., Darragh, J., & Williams, A. (2008). Stereotypes and retrieval-provoked illusory source recollections. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 460–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 155–161. doi: 10.3758/BF03196152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., Auer, T., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 108–124. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, A., & Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 333–345. doi: 10.3758/BF03202501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Watkins, A. M., & Dougherty, M. R. (2006). Word concreteness and encoding effects on context-dependent discrimination. Memory & Cognition, 34, 973–985. doi: 10.3758/BF03193245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Masson, M. E. J. (2007). I’d know that face anywhere! Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1085–1089. doi: 10.3758/BF03193095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, S. A., Robbins, C. A., Gilmore, A. W., & Schacter, D. L. (2012). Retrieval failure contributes to gist-based false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, R. W., Ivanko, S. L., & Bodner, G. E. (2005). Can test list context manipulations improve recognition accuracy in the DRM paradigm? Memory, 13, 862–873. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanczakowski, M., Zawadzka, K., & Coote, L. (2014). Context reinstatement in recognition: Memory and beyond. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 85–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanczakowski, M., Zawadzka, K., & Macken, B. (2015). Continued effects of context reinstatement in recognition. Memory & Cognition, 43, 788–797. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0502-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T. W. (2002). Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 807–815. doi: 10.3758/BF03196339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. L., & Starns, J. J. (2006). The roles of associative strength and source memorability in the contextualization of false memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 39–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockley, W. E. (2008). The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1412–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M. J., Bodner, G. E., & Fawcett, J. M. (2015). Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: A meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 349–365. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0648-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 221–232. doi: 10.3758/BF03213167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R. (2003). Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 811–825. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00018-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, L., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 577–581. doi: 10.3758/BF03214352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2015). Parametric order constraints in multinomial processing tree models: An extension of Knapp and Batchelder (2004). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 64–65, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurcz, I. (1967). Polskie normy powszechności skojarzeń swobodnych na 100 słów z listy Kent-Rosanoffa [Polish norms for free associations to 100 words from Kent-Rosanoff list]. Studia Psychologiczne, 8, 122–255.
   Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., Meier, C. R., Arnal, J. D., & Leding, J. K. (2005). Compelling untruths: Content borrowing and vivid false memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 954–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., Ryals, D. B., & Smith, K. (2008). Compelling untruths: The effect of retention interval on content borrowing and vivid false memories. Memory, 16, 149–156. doi: 10.1080/09658210701839277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, L. L., & Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80002-0
   Google Scholar
• Macken, W. J. (2002). Environmental context and recognition: The role of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, K. J., & Xu, J. (2007). On the flexibility and on the fallibility of associative memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 545–556. doi: 10.3758/BF03193293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M. (2010). Multitree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42–54. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murnane, K., & Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417–428. doi: 10.3758/BF03200931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1994). When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model. Memory & Cognition, 22, 584–590. doi: 10.3758/BF03198397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murnane, K., Phelps, M. P., & Malmberg, K. (1999). Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 403–415. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuschatz, J. S., Benoit, G. E., & Payne, D. G. (2003). Effective warning in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false-memory paradigm: The role of identifiability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 35–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieznanski, M. (2015). Memory for contextual details: Effects of cognitive resources availability during encoding and requirements of context reconstruction during retrieval. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 112, pp. 71–82). New York: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Nieznański, M. (2014). Context reinstatement and memory for intrinsic versus extrinsic context: The role of item generation at encoding or retrieval. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 409–419. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., & Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 261–285. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., & Lloyd, F. J. (1997). Theories of false memory in children and adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 9, 95–123. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(97)90002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. G., & Jacoby, L. L. (2007). On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: Effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 305–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318–339. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1–24. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabuddin, S. S., & Smith, S. M. (2016). Asymmetric reinstatement effects in recognition. Journal of General Psychology, 143, 267–280. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2016.1214100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 460–471.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1994). Theoretical principles of context-dependent memory. In P. E. Morris & M. Gruneberg (Eds.), Theoretical aspects of memory (2nd ed., pp. 168–195). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203–220. doi: 10.3758/BF03196157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2008). A simplified conjoint recognition paradigm for the measurement of gist and verbatim memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 570–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). Measuring phantom recollection in the simplified conjoint recognition paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tkaczyk, D., & Nieznański, M. (2013). Sprawność pamięci roboczej a podatność na fałszywe wspomnienia w zadaniu Deese’a–Roedigera–McDermott [Working memory capacity and susceptibility to false memory in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 56, 491–506.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373. doi: 10.1037/h0020071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2007). Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 254–262. doi: 10.3758/BF03193446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., Myung, J. I., & Batchelder, W. H. (2010). Minimum description length model selection of multinomial processing tree models. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 275–286. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar