110
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Let’s twist again! Embodiment effects in spatial judgments on human figures rotated along a vertical axis

&
Pages 963-976 | Received 11 Jul 2016, Accepted 09 Jun 2017, Published online: 23 Jun 2017

References

  • Alexander, G. M., & Evardone, M. (2008). Blocks and bodies: Sex differences in a novel version of the mental rotations test. Hormones and Behavior, 53(1), 177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.014
  • Amorim, M.-A., Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: “body analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 327–347. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.327
  • Ebersbach, M., & Krüger, M. (2016). View makes a difference: Presenting human figures from the back or front affects mental spatial transformations of children and adults. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 16, 173–191. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2015.1124109
  • Gronholm, P. C., Flynn, M., Edmonds, C. J., & Gardner, M. R. (2012). Empathic and non-empathic routes to visuospatial perspective-taking. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.004
  • Huttenlocher, J., & Presson, C. C. (1973). Mental rotation and the perspective problem .Cognitive Psychology, 4, 277–299. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90015-7
  • Ionta, S., Fourkas, A. D., Fiorio, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2007). The influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet. Experimental Brain Research, 183(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1020-2
  • Jola, C., & Mast, F. (2005). Mental object rotation and egocentric body transformation: Two dissociable processes? Spatial Cognition & Computation, 5, 217–237. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2005.9683804
  • Kaltner, S., Riecke, B., & Jansen, P. (2014). Embodied mental rotation: A special link between egocentric transformation and the bodily self. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00505
  • Kessler, K., & Thomson, L. A. (2010). The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference. Cognition, 114, 72–88. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.015
  • Krüger, M., Amorim, M.-A., & Ebersbach, M. (2014). Mental rotation and the motor system: Embodiment head over heels. Acta Psychologica, 145, 104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.004
  • Krüger, M., Kaiser, M., Mahler, K., Bartels, W., & Krist, H. (2014). Analogue mental transformations in 3-year-olds: Introducing a new mental rotation paradigm suitable for young children. Infant and Child Development, 23, 123–138. doi: 10.1002/icd.1815
  • May, M., & Wendt, M. (2012). Separating mental transformations and spatial compatibility effects in the own body transformation task. Cognitive Processing, 13, 257–260. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0455-y
  • Mohr, C., Blanke, O., & Brugger, P. (2006). Perceptual aberrations impair mental own-body transformations. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120(3), 528–534. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.3.528
  • Murray, J. E. (1997). Flipping and spinning: Spatial transformation procedures in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 25(1), 96–105. doi: 10.3758/BF03197287
  • Parsons, L. M. (1987). Imagined spatial transformation of one’s body. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 172–191. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.116.2.172
  • Sayeki, Y. (1981). “Body analogy” and the cognition of rotated figures. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3, 36–40.
  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
  • Steggemann, Y., Engbert, K., & Weigelt, M. (2011). Selective effects of motor expertise in mental body rotation tasks: Comparing object-based and perspective transformations. Brain and Cognition, 76, 97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.013
  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
  • Zacks, J. M., Mires, J., Tversky, B., & Hazeltine, E. (2000). Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 315–332. doi: 10.1023/A:1015584100204
  • Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial imagery: Transformations of objects and bodies. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 5, 271–306. doi: 10.1207/s15427633scc0504_1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.