Auditory statistical learning: predictive frequency information affects the deployment of contextually mediated attentional resources on perceptual tasks

References

• Adobe Systems Incorporated. (2007). Adobe Audition. San Jose, CA: Adobe Systems Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Alards-Tomalin, D., Walker, A. C., Nepon, H., & Leboe-McGowan, L. C. (2017). Dual-task interference effects on cross-modal numerical order and sound intensity judgments: The more the louder? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(9), 1943–1963. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1216139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 798–815. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 699–706. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmole, J. R., Hambrick, D. Z., Windisch, D. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The role of meaning in contextual cueing: Evidence from chess expertise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(12), 1886–1896. doi: 10.1080/17470210701781155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006a). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(7), 1177–1187. doi: 10.1080/17470210600665996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006b). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 99–108. doi: 10.1080/13506280500165188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosowsky, N. P., & Crump, M. J. C. (2016). Context-specific attentional sampling: Intentional control as a pre-requisite for contextual control. Consciousness and Cognition, 44, 146–160. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M., & Crump, M. J. C. (2012). In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(SEP), 1–16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, K.-P., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(1), 72–80. doi: 10.3758/BF03194784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 170–178. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01476-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28–71. doi.10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10(4), 360–365. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 224–234. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2007). Interactions between attention and memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(2), 177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 24–39. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities. Psychological Science, 17(10), 905–912. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, P. M., & Gratton, G. (2003). Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology, 64, 191–209. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00109-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. E., & Melcher, D. (2014). Stable statistical representations facilitate visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1915–1925. doi: 10.1037/a0037375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C. (2016). Learning to selectively attend from context-specific attentional histories: A demonstration and some constraints. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 70, 59–77. doi: 10.1037/cep0000066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C., Brosowsky, N. P., & Milliken, B. (2016). Reproducing the location-based context-specific proportion congruent effect for frequency unbiased items: A reply to Hutcheon and Spieler (2016). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1206130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 316–321. doi.10.3758/BF03193850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1523–1532. doi: 10.1080/17470210902752096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, L. A. (2014). Winnipeg, MB, Canada: University of Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Egeth, H., Jonides, J., & Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays. Cognitive Psychology, 3(4), 674–698. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12(6), 499–504. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 458–467. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2006). Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms. Psychological Science, 17(6), 526–534. doi: 10.1177/0963721411415340 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01739.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: When context guides the deployment of attention. Journal of Vision, 10(5), 20. doi:10.1167/10.5.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2015). Adapting to stimulus–response contingencies without noticing them. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1475–1481. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2007). Contextual cueing based on specific and categorical properties of the environment. Visual Cognition, 15(3), 257–275. doi: 10.1080/13506280600677744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2009). Semantic contextual cuing and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(1), 50–71. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Thorpe, S. (2015). Investigating implicit statistical learning mechanisms through contextual cueing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 524–533. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, A., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2009). Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 966–976. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. doi: 10.1080/713756773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., & Pashler, H. (2005). Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search. Cognition, 94, B101–B111. doi.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 638–644. doi: 10.3758/BF03196526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(4), 1105–1124. doi:10.1080/0272498004200051 doi: 10.1080/713756001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Contextual cueing: Reciprocal influences between attention and implicit learning. In L. Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 277–296). Philadelphia, PAUSA: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kawahara, J.-I. (2007). Auditory – visual contextual cuing effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(8), 1399–1408. doi.10.3758/BF03192955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83(2), B35–B42. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00004-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubovy, M. (1988). Should we resist the seductiveness of the space is to time as vision is to audition analogy? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14(2), 318–320. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.2.318
   Google Scholar
• Leboe, J. P., Wong, J., Crump, M. J., & Stobbe, K. (2008). Probe-specific proportion task repetition effects on switching costs. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(6), 935–945. doi:10.3758/PP doi: 10.3758/PP.70.6.935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechelt, E. C. (1975). Temporal numerosity discrimination: Intermodal comparisons revisted. British Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 101–108. doi.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01444.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2009). Contextual cost: When a visual-search target is not where it should be. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 216–225. doi.10.1080/17470210903281590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabeta, T., Ono, F., & Kawahara, J. I. (2003). Transfer of spatial context from visual to haptic search. Perception, 32(11), 1351–1358. doi: 10.1068/p5135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, doi:10.1038/320264 a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 520–527. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9(3), 273–302. doi: 10.1080/13506280042000162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, I. R, & Chun, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1299–1313. doi.10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, F., Jiang, Y., & Kawahara, J. (2005). Intertrial temporal contextual cuing: Association across successive visual search trials guides spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(4), 703–712. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(4), 369–378. doi: 10.3758/BF03210419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychology Software Tools. (2012). E-Prime. Sharpsburg, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, J. M., Todd, T. P., & Bouton, M. E. (2013). Context change and associative learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 237–244. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 172–196. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science (New York, NY). doi: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70(1), 27–52. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00075-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 514–523. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80(1–2), 1–46. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00152-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 459–478. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 552–564. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2009). Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(10), 1934–1945. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21131.Neural doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellin, M., Conci, M., von Mühlenen, A., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Two (or three) is one too many: Testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2065–2076. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0175-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar