Modality-specific interference between action planning and perceptual processing

References

• Baldauf, D., & Deubel, H. (2008). Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements. Vision Research, 48, 549–563. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldauf, D., & Deubel, H. (2009). Attentional selection of multiple goal positions before rapid hand movement sequences: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 18–29. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: Asimpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
   Google Scholar
• Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673–1692. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., & Paprotta, I. (1998). Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition, 5, 81–107. doi: 10.1080/713756776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research, 71, 22–29. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0033-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99. doi: 10.1037/h0028689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In B. J. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 121–140). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology ( Vol. 2). New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• James, K. H., & Gauthier, I. (2009). When writing impairs reading: Letter perception’s susceptibility to motor interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 416–431. doi: 10.1037/a0015836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juravle, G., & Deubel, H. (2009). Action preparation enhances the processing of tactile targets. Experimental Brain Research, 198, 301–311. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1819-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juravle, G., Deubel, H., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2010). Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement. Behavioural Brain Research, 208, 391–401. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juravle, G., Heed, T., Spence, C., & Röder, B. (2016). Neural correlates of tactile perception during pre-, peri-, and post-movement. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 1293–1305. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4589-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2004). Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli. Psychological Research, 68, 199–207. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0156-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medizinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Wedimann’sche Buchhandlug.
   Google Scholar
• Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125–129. doi: 10.3758/BF03210785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paprotta, I., Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1999). Object recognition and goal-directed eye or hand movements are coupled by visual attention. In W. Becker, H. Deubel, & T. Mergner (Eds.), Current oculomotor research: Physiological and psychological aspects (pp. 241–248). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47–76). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154. doi: 10.1080/713752551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Action can affect auditory perception. Psychological Science, 18, 6–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01839.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomaschke, R., Hopkins, B., & Miall, R. C. (2012). The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: Reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects. Psychological Review, 119, 388–407. doi: 10.1037/a0027453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waszak, F., Cardoso-Leite, P., & Hughes, G. (2012). Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 943–959. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11(18), R729–R732. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00432-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217. doi: 10.1038/81497
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11(7–8), 1317–1329. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5
   Google Scholar
• Wykowska, A., Chellali, R., Al-Amin, M. M., & Müller, H. (2014). Implications of robot actions for human perception. How do we represent actions of the observed robots? International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3), 357–366. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0239-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykowska, A., Hommel, B., & Schubö, A. (2011). Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 1034–1041. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0122-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykowska, A., Hommel, B., & Schubö, A. (2012). Imaging when acting: Picture but not word cues induce action-related biases of visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykowska, A., & Schubö, A. (2012). Action intentions modulate allocation of visual attention: Electrophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2009). How you move is what you see: Action planning biases selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755–1769. doi: 10.1037/a0016798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar