Simultaneous motor demands affect decision making under objective risk

References

• Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 17–42. doi: 10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A. (2005). Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1458–1463. doi: 10.1038/nn1584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 336–372. doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 24(4), 561–595. doi: 10.1080/02699930903132496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ble, A., Volpato, S., Zuliani, G., Guralnik, J. M., Bandinelli, S., Lauretani, F., … Ferrucci, L. (2005). Executive function correlates with walking speed in older persons: The InCHIANTI study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(3), 410–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53157.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Fujiwara, E., Borsutzky, S., Kalbe, E., Kessler, J., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2005). Decision-making deficits of korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology, 19(3), 267–277. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Laier, C., Pawlikowski, M., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2009). Decision making with and without feedback: The role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(8), 984–998. doi: 10.1080/13803390902776860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Recknor, E. C., Grabenhorst, F., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 86–99. doi: 10.1080/13803390500507196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Roth-Bauer, M., Driessen, M., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2008). Executive functions and risky decision-making in patients with opiate dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97(1), 64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., & Schiebener, J. (2013). Interactions of age and cognitive functions in predicting decision making under risky conditions over the life span. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 9–23. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.740000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R., Everitt, B. J., & Bishop, D. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413–1420. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dault, M. C., Yardley, L., & Frank, J. S. (2003). Does articulation contribute to modifications of postural control during dual-task paradigms? Cognitive Brain Research, 16(3), 434–440. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00058-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Del Missier, F., Mäntylä, T., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010). Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(2), 69–97. doi: 10.1080/13546781003630117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denburg, N. L., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A. (2005). The ability to decide advantageously declines prematurely in some normal older persons. Neuropsychologia, 43(7), 1099–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euteneuer, F., Schaefer, F., Stuermer, R., Boucsein, W., Timmermann, L., Barbe, M. T., … Kalbe, E. (2009). Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A neuropsychological and psychophysiological study. Neuropsychologia, 47(13), 2882–2890. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. Psychological Review, 103(2), 356–363. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia card task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 709–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathmann, B., Pawlikowski, M., Schöler, T., & Brand, M. (2014b). Performing a secondary executive task with affective stimuli interferes with decision making under risk conditions. Cognitive Processing, 15(2), 113–126. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0584-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathmann, B., Schiebener, J., Wolf, O. T., & Brand, M. (2015). Monitoring supports performance in a dual-task paradigm involving a risky decision-making task and a working memory task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(142), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gathmann, B., Schulte, F. P., Maderwald, S., Pawlikowski, M., Starcke, K., Schäfer, L. C., … Brand, M. (2014a). Stress and decision making: Neural correlates of the interaction between stress, executive functions, and decision making under risk. Experimental Brain Research, 232(3), 957–973. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3808-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada, T., Miyai, I., Suzuki, M., & Kubota, K. (2009). Gait capacity affects cortical activation patterns related to speed control in the elderly. Experimental Brain Research, 193(3), 445–454. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1643-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2003). Impulsive decision making and working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 298–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzer, R., Verghese, J., Xue, X., & Lipton, R. B. (2006). Cognitive processes related to gait velocity: Results from the Einstein aging study. Neuropsychology, 20(2), 215–223. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, B., Condon, S. M., & McDonald, L. A. (1985). Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 617–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajoie, Y., Teasdale, N., Bard, C., & Fleury, M. (1993). Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Experimental Brain Research, 97(1), 139–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00228824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebherr, M., Schubert, P., Schiebener, J., Kersten, S., & Haas, C. T. (2016). Dual-tasking and aging - about multiple perspectives and possible implementations in interventions for the elderly. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2016.1261440
   Google Scholar
• Liebherr, M., Weiland-Breckle, H., Grewe, T., & Schumacher, P. B. (2018). Cognitive performance under motor demands–On the influence of task difficulty and postural control. Brain Research, 1684, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maylor, E. A., Allison, S., & Wing, A. M. (2001). Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability. British Journal of Psychology, 92(2), 319–338. doi: 10.1348/000712601162211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlroy, W. E., Norrie, R. G., Brooke, J. D., Bishop, D. C., Nelson, A. J., & Maki, B. E. (1999). Temporal properties of attention sharing consequent to disturbed balance. Neuroreport, 10(14), 2895–2899. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199909290-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S. (2003). Postural costs of suprapostural task load. Human Movement Science, 22(3), 253–270. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(03)00052-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(8), 349–357. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01699-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237–241. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchi, Y., Okada, H., Yoshikawa, E., Nobezawa, S., & Futatsubashi, M. (1999). Brain activation during maintenance of standing postures in humans. Brain, 122(2), 329–338. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.2.329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pabst, S., Brand, M., & Wolf, O. T. (2013a). Stress and decision making: A few minutes make all the difference. Behavioural Brain Research, 250, 39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabst, S., Schoofs, D., Pawlikowski, M., Brand, M., & Wolf, O. T. (2013b). Paradoxical effects of stress and an executive task on decisions under risk. Behavioral Neuroscience, 127(3), 369–379. doi: 10.1037/a0032334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persad, C. C., Giordani, B., Chen, H. C., Ashton-Miller, J. A., Alexander, N. B., Wilson, C. S., … Schultz, A. B. (1995). Neuropsychological predictors of complex obstacle avoidance in healthy older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50B(5), P272–P277. doi: 10.1093/geronb/50B.5.P272
   Google Scholar
• Ramenzoni, V. C., Riley, M. A., Shockley, K., & Chiu, C. Y. P. (2007). Postural responses to specific types of working memory tasks. Gait & Posture, 25(3), 368–373. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebener, J, & Brand, M. (2015). Decision making under objective risk conditions–a review of cognitive and emotional correlates, strategies, feedback processing, and external influences. Neuropsychology review, 25(2), 171–198. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9285-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebener, J., Wegmann, E., Gathmann, B., Laier, C., Pawlikowski, M., & Brand, M. (2014). Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1386), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiebener, J., Wegmann, E., Pawlikowski, M., & Brand, M. (2012). Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker’s executive functions. Cognitive Processing, 13(4), 321–332. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0522-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebener, J., Wegmann, E., Pawlikowski, M., & Brand, M. (2013). Supporting decisions under risk: Explicit advice differentially affects people according to their working memory performance and executive functioning. Neuroscience of Decision Making, 1, 9–18. doi: 10.2478/ndm-2013-0002
   Google Scholar
• Schiebener, J., Zamarian, L., Delazer, M., & Brand, M. (2011). Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(9), 1025–1039. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.595702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. (2000). Attentional demands and postural control: The effect of sensory context. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 55(1), M10–M16. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.1.M10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, S., Giladi, N., Peretz, C., Yogev, G., Simon, E. S., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2006). Dual-tasking effects on gait variability: The role of aging, falls, and executive function. Movement Disorders, 21(7), 950–957. doi: 10.1002/mds.20848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starcke, K., Pawlikowski, M., Wolf, O. T., Altstötter-Gleich, C., & Brand, M. (2011a). Decision-making under risk conditions is susceptible to interference by a secondary executive task. Cognitive Processing, 12(2), 177–182. doi: 10.1007/s10339-010-0387-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, M., Miyai, I., Ono, T., & Kubota, K. (2008). Activities in the frontal cortex and gait performance are modulated by preparation. An fNIRS study. Neuroimage, 39(2), 600–607. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, L., Otani, H., Loubert, P. V., Sheffert, S. M., & Dunbar, G. L. (2004). Improving balance by performing a secondary cognitive task. British Journal of Psychology, 95(1), 31–40. doi: 10.1348/000712604322779442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., Sorge, G. B., Benoit, A., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(5), 562–581. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, O. H., Evans, C. E., Bunce, A., Carzolio, B., & O’Connor, J. (2005). Emotion-based learning and central executive resources: An investigation of intuition and the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 57(3), 244–247. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., Adams, R., & Chambers, C. D. (2012). Proactive motor control reduces monetary risk taking in gambling. Psychological Science, 23(7), 805–815. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, T. J., & Jiang, Y. V. (2008). Inferior parietal lobule supports decision making under uncertainty in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 19(4), 916–925. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 31(2), 243–251. doi: 10.3758/BF03194383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, L., Gardner, M., Leadbetter, A., & Lavie, N. (1999). Effect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control. Neuroreport, 10(2), 215–219. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199902050-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yechiam, E., & Hochman, G. (2014). Loss attention in a dual-task setting. Psychological Science, 25(2), 494–502. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar