Changing views: the effect of explicit perception-focus instructions on perspective-taking

References

• Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind-readers’ toolkit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, D. R. (2005). Everyday solutions to the problem of other minds: Which tools are used when? In B. F. Malle, & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 158–173). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apperly, I. A., Back, E., Samson, D., & France, L. (2008). The cost of thinking about false beliefs: Evidence from adults’ performance on a non-inferential theory of mind task. Cognition, 106(3), 1093–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apperly, I. A., Caroll, D. J., Samson, D., Humphreys, G. W., Qureshi, A., & Moffitt, G. (2010). Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults’ ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1201–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including the other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The ‘reading the mind in the eyes’ test-revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2005). Mindreading in an exotic case: The normal adult human. In B. F. Malle, & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 271–283). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs. Psychological Science, 18(5), 382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2017). The world looks better together: How close others enhance our visual experiences. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 694–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 893–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 107(3), 1122–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S., & Hanna, J. E. (2011). Talking in another person’s shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language processing. Dialogue and Discourse, 2, 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science, 32, 643–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Giles, G. E., Mahoney, C. R., Kessler, K., & Taylor, H. A. (2012). Gender and autistic personality traits predict perspective-taking ability in typical adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 84–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowski, H., & Samson, D. (2017). New insights into the inter-individual variability in perspective taking. Vision, 1(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., & Nelson, D. (1965). The effect of topic importance and attitude similarity-dissimilarity on attraction in a multistranger design. Psychonomic Science, 3(1–12), 449–450.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind. Child Development, 72(4), 1032–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Claxton, L. J. (2004). Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(4), 299–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek, N. N. (2015). Taking perspective the next time around. Commentary on: “Perceived perspective taking: When others walk in our shoes”. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopik, W. J., O’Brien, E., & Konrath, S. H. (2017). Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(1), 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory & Cognition, 1, 246–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damen, D., van der Wijst, P., van Amelsvoort, M., & Krahmer, E. (2018). Perspective-taking in referential communication: Does stimulated attention to addressees’ perspective influence speakers’ reference production? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(2), 257–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety, J., & Sommerville, J. A. (2003). Shared representations between self and others: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 527–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elekes, F., Varga, M., & Király, I. (2016). Evidence for spontaneous level-2 perspective taking in adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Morewedge, C. K., & Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 760–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, T., Steffel, M., & Epley, N. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 547–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. J., Apperly, I., & Cane, J. E. (2017). Eye tracking reveals the cost of switching between self and other perspectives in a visual perspective-taking task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1646–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the level 1–level 2 distinction. Developmental Psychology, 17, 99–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28, 105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, D., Gorman, K. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2012). To name or to describe: Shared knowledge affects referential form. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 290–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, D., Grodner, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference. Cognition, 108, 831–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, R. A., Vinkhuyzen, A. A., Wheelwright, S., Bartels, M., Boomsma, D. I., Baron-Cohen, S., & van der Sluis, S. (2011). The construction and validation of an abridged version of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ-Short). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(5), 589–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59(1), 91–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J., & Presson, C. C. (1973). Mental rotation and the perspective problem. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 277–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaland, C., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2014). White bear effects in language production: Evidence from the prosodic realization of adjectives. Language and Speech, 57(4), 470–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, K., Cao, L., O’Shea, K. J., & Wang, H. (2014). A cross-culture, cross-gender comparison of perspective taking mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), 46–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89(1), 25–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 551–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S. D., Tversky, B., Ohgishi, M., & Schiano, D. J. (2003). Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3(1), 3–42.
   Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., Luce, C. L., Neuberg, S. L., Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B. J. (2002). The effects of perspective taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1601–1610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. P. (2009). Inferences about mental states. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1309–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50(4), 655–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moonesinghe, R., Khoury, M. J., & Janssens, A. C. (2007). Most published research findings are false—but a little replication goes a long way. PLoS Medicine, 4(2), 218–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, T. (2001). ‘Seek and yes hall find’: Antecedents of assimilation and contrast in social comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 499–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadig, A. S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13(4), 329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & Norton, D. A. (2011). Seeing ourselves in others: Reviewer ambiguity, egocentric anchoring, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 617–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, E. S., & Graham, S. A. (2009). The relations between children’s communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 220–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki, S., Jr., & Duke, M. P. (1994). Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The diagnostic analysis of nonverbal accuracy scale. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 9–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 657–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A. W., Apperly, I. A., & Samson, D. (2010). Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual- task study of adults. Cognition, 117(2), 230–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. J., & Aman, C. J. (1993). Developmental differences in giving directions: Spatial frames of reference and mental rotation. Child Development, 64(4), 1258–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryskin, R. A., Benjamin, A. S., Tullis, J., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2015). Perspective-taking in comprehension, production, and memory: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 898–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1255–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, S., Roehr-Brackin, K., Jelbert, S., & Clayton, N. S. (2018). Flexible egocentricity: Asymmetric switch costs on a perspective-taking task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiesteban, I., White, S., Cook, J., Gilbert, S. J., Heyes, C., & Bird, G. (2012). Training social cognition: From imitation to theory of mind. Cognition, 122(2), 228–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitsky, K., Keysar, B., Epley, N., Carter, T., & Swanson, A. (2011). The closeness-communication bias: Increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 269–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D., Nott, Z. E., & Dux, P. E. (2014). Task instructions and implicit theory of mind. Cognition, 133(1), 43–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., & Dux, P. E. (2017). Current evidence for automatic theory of mind processing in adults. Cognition, 162, 27–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober, M. F. (1993). Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition, 47(1), 1–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., Weissengruber, S., Surtees, A., Samson, D., & Perner, J. (2015). Clarifying the role of theory of mind areas during visual perspective taking: Issues of spontaneity and domain-specificity. NeuroImage, 117, 386–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, H. W., Berkowitz, N. N., & Moyer, R. J. (1970). Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and a theory. Psychological Bulletin, 73(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. J., & Todd, A. R. (2017). Intergroup visual perspective-taking: Shared group membership impairs self-perspective inhibition but may facilitate perspective calculation. Cognition, 166, 371–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotland, E. (1969). Exploratory investigations of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 271–314). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroebe, W., Insko, C. A., Thompson, V. D., & Layton, B. D. (1971). Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 79–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surtees, A. D., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Egocentrism and automatic perspective taking in children and adults. Child Development, 83(2), 452–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surtees, A., Samson, D., & Apperly, I. (2016). Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen. Cognition, 148, 97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., Nadler, J., & Lount, R. B., Jr. (2006). Judgmental biases in conflict resolution and how to overcome them. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 243–267). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, A. R., Hanko, K., Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives. Psychological Science, 22(1), 134–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective taking. Cognition, 110, 124–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardlow, L. (2013). Individual differences in speakers’ perspective taking: The roles of executive control and working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 766–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardlow Lane, L. W., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: Do cognitive demands override threats to referential success? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1466–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardlow Lane, L. W., Groisman, M., & Ferreira, V. S. (2006). Don’t talk about pink elephants! Speakers’ control over leaking private information during language production. Psychological Science, 17(4), 273–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardlow Lane, L. W., & Liersch, M. J. (2012). Can you keep a secret? Increasing speakers’ motivation to keep information confidential yields poorer outcomes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(3), 462–473.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S., & Keysar, B. (2007). The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science, 18(7), 600–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, 1–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar