Anticipation-specific reliability and trial-to-trial carryover of anticipatory attentional bias for threat

References

• Alilović, J., Timmermans, B., Reteig, L. C., van Gaal, S., & Slagter, H. A. (2019). No evidence that predictions and attention modulate the first feedforward sweep of cortical information processing. Cerebral Cortex, 29(5), 2261–2278. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataya, A. F., Adams, S., Mullings, E., Cooper, R. M., Attwood, A. S., & Munafò, M. R. (2012). Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 121(1–2), 148–151. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantin, T., Stevens, S., Gerlach, A. L., & Hermann, C. (2016). What does the facial dot-probe task tell us about attentional processes in social anxiety? A systematic review. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Böcker, K. B., Brunia, C. H., de Munck, J. C., & Spekreijse, H. (2001). Event-related desynchronization during anticipatory attention for an upcoming stimulus: A comparative EEG/MEG study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(2), 393–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M. C. M., & Brunia, C. H. (2001). Anticipatory attention: An event-related desynchronization approach. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 43(1), 91–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Posthuma, D., Groot, P. F. C., & de Geus, E. J. C. (2002). Event-related alpha and theta responses in a visuo-spatial working memory task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(12), 1882–1893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. M., Eley, T. C., Broeren, S., MacLeod, C. M., Rinck, M., Hadwin, J. A., & Lester, K. J. (2014). Psychometric properties of reaction time based experimental paradigms measuring anxiety-related information-processing biases in children. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(1), 97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A., Devue, C., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2019). Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task. Psychological Research, 83(2), 308–320. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0947-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelazzi, L., E to inova, J., Calletti, R., Lo Gerfo, E., Sani, I., Della Libera, C., & Santandrea, E. (2014). Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(25), 8594–8604. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0277-14.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetverikov, A., & Upravitelev, P. (2016). Online versus offline: The web as a medium for response time data collection. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 1086–1099. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0632-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, P., Schoenmakers, T. M., & Field, M. (2015). Less than meets the eye: Reappraising the clinical relevance of attentional bias in addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 44, 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203–216. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear, B. F., Sharpe, L., Nicholas, M. K., & Refshauge, K. (2011). The psychometric properties of the dot-probe paradigm when used in pain-related attentional bias research. The Journal of Pain, 12(12), 1247–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20(6), 778–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02360.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, M., Nelson, E. E., McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Munson, S., Eshel, N., … Pine, D. S. (2004). Choice selection and reward anticipation: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 42(12), 1585–1597. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018). Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention (Vol. 25). doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y.
   Google Scholar
• Field, M., & Duka, T. (2002). Cues paired with a low dose of alcohol acquire conditioned incentive properties in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology, 159(3), 325–334. doi: 10.1007/s00213-001-0923-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, M., Mogg, K., Zetteler, J., & Bradley, B. P. (2004). Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: The roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology, 176(1), 88–93. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1855-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E. (2016). Attentional bias variability and cued attentional bias for alcohol stimuli. Addiction Research and Theory, 25(1), 32–38. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2016.1196674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E. (2017a). Carryover effects in spatial attentional bias tasks and their relationship to subclinical PTSD symptoms. Traumatology, 23(4), 303–308. doi: 10.1037/trm0000121
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E. (2017b). OnlineCBM. doi:10.5281/zenodo.844038.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E. (2019). Spatial anticipatory attentional bias for alcohol: A preliminary report on reliability and associations with risky drinking. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction. doi:10.31234/OSF.IO/WP6S5.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E., & de Jong, R. (2005). Bursts of occipital theta and alpha amplitude preceding alternation and repetition trials in a task-switching experiment. Biological Psychology, 68(3), 309–329. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E., & Figner, B. (2014). “Hot” cognition and dual systems: Introduction, criticisms, and ways forward. In E. Wilhelms, & V. F. Reyna (Eds.), Frontiers of cognitive psychology series: neuroeconomics, judgment and decision making (pp. 157–180). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E., & Figner, B. (2019). Trial-to-trial carryover effects on spatial attentional bias. Acta Psychologica, 196, 51–55. doi: 10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2019.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E., Figner, B., Crone, E. A., & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(4), 364–376. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E., Möbius, M., & Becker, E. S. (2019). Predictive attentional bias modification induces stimulus-evoked attentional bias for threat. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, In press.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E., Möbius, M., Mcloughlin, S., & Tyndall, I. (2019). Anticipatory versus reactive spatial attentional bias to threat. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E., & Vink, M. (2018). Alcohol-related attentional bias variability and conflicting automatic associations. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 9(2). doi: 10.5127/jep.062317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K. L. H., Adams, W., & Garner, M. (2010). Preferential processing of fear faces: Emotional content vs. low-level visual properties. Journal of Vision, 10(7), 610–610. doi: 10.1167/10.7.610
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K. L. H., Adams, W. J., Hedger, N., Newton, K. E., & Garner, M. (2013). Faces and awareness: Low-level, not emotional factors determine perceptual dominance. Emotion, 13(3), 537–544. doi: 10.1037/a0031403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Duval, E. (2016). Exploring carry-over effects to elucidate attention bias modification’s mixed results. Journal of Young Investigators, 31(3), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, L., & Duka, T. (2006). Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: Is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated? Psychopharmacology, 184(3–4), 553–566. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0150-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollerman, J. R., Tremblay, L., & Schultz, W. (2000). Involvement of basal ganglia and orbitofrontal cortex in goal-directed behavior. Progress in Brain Research, 126, 193–215. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26015-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacoviello, B. M., Wu, G., Abend, R., Murrough, J. W., Feder, A., Fruchter, E., … Charney, D. S. (2014). Attention bias variability and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 27(2), 232–239. doi: 10.1002/jts.21899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappenman, E. S., Farrens, J. L., Luck, S. J., & Proudfit, G. H. (2014). Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: Poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(DEC), 1368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korucuoglu, O., Gladwin, T. E., & Wiers, R. W. (2014). Preparing to approach or avoid alcohol: EEG correlates, and acute alcohol effects. Neuroscience Letters, 559, 199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Signals for threat modulate attentional capture and holding: Fear-conditioning and extinction during the exogenous cueing task. Cognition & Emotion, 19(5), 771–780. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruijt, A.-W., Field, A. P., Fox, E., Thompson, E., Reinecke, A., & Beevers, C. (2016). Capturing dynamics of biased attention: Are new attention variability measures the way forward? Plos One, 11(11), e0166600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition & Emotion, 21(6), 1270–1296. doi: 10.1080/02699930701438152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pelley, M. E., Vadillo, M., & Luque, D. (2013). Learned predictiveness influences rapid attentional capture: Evidence from the dot probe task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1888–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., Grafton, B., & Notebaert, L. (2019). Anxiety-linked attentional bias: Is it reliable? Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 529–554. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, R. J. (2018, May 21). Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity? Clinical Psychology Review, 69, 4–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1999). Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness. Cognition & Emotion, 13(6), 713–740. doi: 10.1080/026999399379050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogg, K., Holmes, A., Garner, M., & Bradley, B. P. (2008). Effects of threat cues on attentional shifting, disengagement and response slowing in anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(5), 656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël, X., Colmant, M., Van Der Linden, M., Bechara, A., Bullens, Q., Hanak, C., & Verbanck, P. (2006). Time course of attention for alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholic patients: The role of initial orienting. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30(11), 1871–1877. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00224.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notebaert, L., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., De Houwer, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize, attention: A conditioning approach. Emotion, 11(1), 81–89. doi: 10.1037/a0021286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourtois, G., & Vuilleumier, P. (2006). Dynamics of emotional effects on spatial attention in the human visual cortex. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 67–91. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56004-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puls, S., & Rothermund, K. (2018). Attending to emotional expressions: No evidence for automatic capture in the dot-probe task. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 450–463. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1314932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., König, P., & Singer, W. (1997). Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature, 385(6612), 157–161. doi: 10.1038/385157a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushworth, M. F. S., Passingham, R. E., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Components of attentional set-switching. Experimental Psychology, 52(2), 83–98. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, K., & Doya, K. (2007). Multiple representations of belief states and action values in corticobasal ganglia loops. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104, 213–228. doi: 10.1196/annals.1390.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmukle, S. C. (2005). Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality, 19(7), 595–605. doi: 10.1002/per.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, W., Kreiter, A., Engel, A., Fries, P., Roelfsema, P., & Volgushev, M. (1996). Precise timing of neuronal discharges within and across cortical areas: Implications for synaptic transmission. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 90, 221–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slagter, H. A., Alilovic, J., & Van Gaal, S. (2018). How early does attention modulate visual information processing? The importance of experimental protocol and data analysis approach. Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(1–2), 26–28. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2017.1372405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swick, D., & Ashley, V. (2017). Enhanced attentional bias variability in post-traumatic stress disorder and its relationship to more general impairments in cognitive control. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 14559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15226-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Mathworks. (2015). MATLAB. Natick, MA: The Mathworks, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma, P., Soria Bauser, D., & Suchan, B. (2013). BESST (Bochum emotional stimulus set)—A pilot validation study of a stimulus set containing emotional bodies and faces from frontal and averted views. Psychiatry Research, 209(1), 98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend, J. M., & Duka, T. (2001). Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: Differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology, 157(1), 67–74. doi: 10.1007/s002130100764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend, J. M., & Duka, T. (2007). Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli in alcohol-dependent inpatients. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(8), 1349–1357. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00429.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollstädt-Klein, S., Loeber, S., von der Goltz, C., Mann, K., & Kiefer, F. (2009). Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli increases during the early stage of abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 44(5), 458–463. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agp056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waechter, S., Nelson, A. L., Wright, C., Hyatt, A., & Oakman, J. (2014). Measuring attentional bias to threat: Reliability of dot probe and eye movement indices. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(3), 313–333. doi: 10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zvielli, A., Bernstein, A., & Koster, E. H. W. (2014). Dynamics of attentional bias to threat in anxious adults: Bias towards and/or away? PloS One, 9(8), e104025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar