Enactive experience promotes early number understanding: a study with 3-year-old children

References

• Alibali, M. W., & DiRusso, A. A. (1999). The function of gesture in learning to count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14(1), 37–56. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(99)80017-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, M., Olivier, E., & Badets, A. (2008). Actions, words, and numbers: A motor contribution to semantic processing? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 313–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J. (1991). Procédures et principes de comptage: Leur développement avant l’école (The development of preschoolers’ counting skills and principles). In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, & J. P. Fischer (Eds.), Les chemins du nombre (Pathways to number) (pp. 133–158). Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., & Codd, J. (1996). Developing representations of quantity. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 281–291. doi: 10.1037/0008-400X.28.4.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloechle, J., Huber, S., & Moeller, K. (2015). In touch with numbers: Embodied and situated effects in number magnitude comparison. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 478–489. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.1001760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. L. (2009). Constructive processes: Abstraction, generalization, and dialectics. In U. Müller, J. I. M. Carpendale, & L. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Piaget (pp. 150–170). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalcante, S., & Rodríguez, C. (2015). The understanding of die as an object that has numerical functions. A longitudinal study using two children from the ages of 24 to 36 months interacting with an adult/La comprensión del dado como objeto con funciones numéricas. Un estudio longitudinal con dos niños desde los 24 a los 36 meses en interacción con un adulto. Estudios de Psicología, 36(1), 48–70. doi: 10.1080/02109395.2014.1000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domahs, F., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Willmes, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2010). Embodied numerosity: Implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures. Cognition, 116(2), 251–266. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droz, R. (1992). The multiple roots of natural numbers and their multiple interpretations. In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, & J. P. Fischer (Eds.), Pathways to number: Children’s developing numerical abilities (pp. 229–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. (1988). Children’s counting and concept of number. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions rethinking the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 905–919. doi: 10.1080/17470210701625550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action’s influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 664–674. doi: 10.1177/1745691610388764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T. (1999). The role of gesture in children’s learning to count. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 333–355. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, C. Q., Meng, W., Yao, R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2013). The motor system contributes to comprehension of abstract language. PloS one, 8(9), e75183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., Spaepen, E., Gibson, D., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2015). Gesture as a window onto children’s number knowledge. Cognition, 144, 14–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontra, C., Lyons, D., Fischer, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Physical experience enhances science learning. Psychological Science, 26, 737–749. doi: 10.1177/0956797615569355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• López Íñiguez, G., & Pozo, J. I. (2014). The influence of teachers’ conceptions on their students’ learning: Children's understanding of sheet music. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 311–328. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozada, M., & Carro, N. (2016). Embodied action improves cognition in children: Evidence from a study based on Piagetian conservation tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, E., Scheuer, N., Cavalcante, S., Trench, M., & Brizuela, B. M. (2016). Symbolic representation of the number three: A study with three-year-old children from contrasting socioeconomic environments. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 743–755. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1188821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, E., Scheuer, N., & De La Cruz, M. (2013). Symbolic use of quantitative representations in young children. In M. Brizuela & B. Gravel (Eds.), Show me what you know. Exploring representations across STEM disciplines (pp. 7–21). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menary, R. (2016). Mathematical cognition: A case of enculturation. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND (pp. 1–20). MIND Group: Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2002). Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mix, K. S., Sandhofer, C. M., & Baroody, A. J. (2005). Number words and number concepts: The interplay of verbal and nonverbal quantification in early childhood. Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, 33, 305–346. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2407(05)80011-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Borba, M., Dimattia, C., Arzarello, F., Robutti, O., Schnepp, M., … Johnson, J. L. (2004). PME special Issue: Bodily activity and imagination in mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(3), 303–321. doi: 10.1007/s10649-004-5933-4
   Google Scholar
• Nicoladis, E., Pika, S., & Marentette, P. (2010). Are number gestures easier than number words for preschoolers? Cognitive Development, 25, 247–261. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novack, M. A., Congdon, E. L., Hemani-Lopez, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). From action to abstraction: Using the hands to learn math. Psychological Science, 25, 903–910. doi: 10.1177/0956797613518351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Patro, K., Nuerk, H. C., & Cress, U. (2015). Does your body count? Embodied influences on the preferred counting direction of preschoolers. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 413–425. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2015.1008005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1941). La genèse du nombre chez l’enfant. Oxford: Delachaux, Niestle.
   Google Scholar
• Popova, Y. B. (2015). Narrativity and enaction: The social nature of literary narrative understanding. In Stories, meaning, and experience (pp. 61–103). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, C. (2007). Object, communication and signs. The triadic basis of early cognitive development. In J. Valsiner y A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of socio-Cultural psychology (pp. 257–276). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J., Martí, E., & Salsa, A. (2018). Symbolic representations and cardinal knowledge in 3-and 4-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 48, 235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnecka, B. W. (2015). Learning to represent exact numbers. Synthese, 192, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B., Guberman, S. R., Gearhart, M., Gelman, R., Massey, C. M., & Rogoff, B. (1987). Social processes in early number development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 52(2), i–162. doi: 10.2307/1166071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuer, N., Martí, E., Cavalcante, S., & Brizuela, B. M. (2019). Response patterns of young children from two contrasting SES contexts to different numerical tasks with numbers 1–5. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 180(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1562417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuer, N., & Sinclair, A. (2009). From one to two: Observing one child’s early mathematical steps. In C. Andersen, N. Scheuer, M. P. L. Pérez Echeverría, & E. V. Teubal (Eds.), Representational systems and practices as learning tools (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. (2005). Las matemáticas y la imitación entre el año y los tres años de edad. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 28, 377–392. doi: 10.1174/021037005774518983
   Google Scholar
• Sixtus, E., Fischer, M. H., & Lindemann, O. (2017). Finger posing primes number comprehension. Cognitive Processing, 18, 237–248. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0804-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, D., & Stapleton, M. (2012). Es are good: Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affective and extended. In F. Paglieri (Ed.), Consciousness in interaction: The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness (pp. 89–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wasner, M., Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Related but not the same: Ordinality, cardinality and 1-to-1 correspondence in finger-based numerical representations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 426–441. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.964719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witherington, D. C. (2007). The dynamic systems approach as metatheory for developmental psychology. Human Development, 50(2–3), 127–153. doi: 10.1159/000100943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witherington, D. C., & Heying, S. (2013). Embodiment and agency: Toward a holistic synthesis for developmental science. In R. M. Lerner & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 44, pp. 161–192). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young Loveridge, J. M. (1989). The relationship between children's home experiences and their mathematical skills on entry to school. Early Child Development and Care, 43, 43–59. doi: 10.1080/0300443890430105
   Google Scholar