571
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Cognition embodied: mental rotation is faster for objects that imply a greater body–object interaction

, , &
Pages 876-890 | Received 24 May 2019, Accepted 02 Oct 2019, Published online: 25 Oct 2019

References

  • Amorim, M.-A., Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: “Body analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 327–347. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.327
  • Anderson, M. L. (2007). Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas. The Neuroscientist: A review Journal Bringing Neurobiology. Neurology and Psychiatry, 13(1), 13–21. doi: 10.1177/1073858406294706
  • Aster von, H., Horn, R., & Neubauer, A. (2009). WIE-Wechlser Intelligenztest für Erwachsene. Deutschsprachige Bearbeitung und Adaptation des WAIS-III von David Wechsler. Frankfurt: Pearson Assessment & Information GmbH.
  • Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 16, 1818–1823. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060
  • Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x
  • Bennett, S. D. R., Burnett, A. N., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2011). Imageability and body-object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1100–1109. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0117-5
  • Borst, G. (2013). Neural underpinnings of object mental imagery, spatial imagery, and motor imagery. In K. N. Ochsner & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of cognitive neuroscience, volume 2 (pp. 74–87). Oxford University Press.
  • Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 355–363. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.020
  • Cameron, C. E., Brock, L. L., Murrah, W. M., Bell, L. H., Worzalla, S. L., Grissmer, D., & Morrison, F. J. (2012). Fine motor skills and executive function both contribute to kindergarten achievement. Child Development, 83, 1229–1244. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01768.x
  • Cameron, C. E., Cottone, E. A., Murrah, W. M., & Grissmer, D. W. (2016). How are motor skills linked to children’s school performance and academic achievement? Child Development Perspectives, 10, 93–98. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12168
  • Chien, C.-W., Brown, T., & McDonald, R. (2009). A framework of children’s hand skills for assessment and intervention. Child: Care, Health and Development, 35, 873–884. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01002.x
  • Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125, 452–465. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010
  • Dekker, T., Mareschal, D., Sereno, M. I., & Johnson, M. H. (2011). Dorsal and ventral stream activation and object recognition performance in school-age children. NeuroImage, 57(3), 659–670. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.005
  • Ehrsson, H. H., Geyer, S., & Naito, E. (2003). Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3304–3316. doi: 10.1152/jn.01113.2002
  • Fischer, U., Suggate, S., Schmirl, J., & Stoeger, H. (2018). Counting on fine motor skills: Links between preschool finger dexterity and numerical skills. Developmental Science, 21, e12623. doi: 10.1111/desc.12623
  • Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850. doi: 10.1080/17470210701623605
  • Flusberg, S. J., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Are things that are hard to physically move also hard to imagine moving? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 158–164. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0024-2
  • Gill, H. S., O’Boyle, M. W., & Hathaway, J. (1998). Cortical distribution of Eeg activity for component processes during mental rotation. Cortex, 34, 707–718. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70774-3
  • Glenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 5–18.
  • Glenberg, A. M., Goldberg, A. B., & Zhu, X. (2011). Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instructional Science, 39, 27–39. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9096-7
  • Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379–401. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2714
  • Grissmer, D., Grimm, K. J., Aiyer, S. M., Murrah, W. M., & Steele, J. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: Two new school readiness indicators. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1008–1017. doi: 10.1037/a0020104
  • Hansen, W., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the output of encoding during stimulus fixation. Acta Psychologica, 69, 95–107. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90001-7
  • Hargreaves, I. S., Leonard, G. A., Pexman, P. M., Pittman, D. J., Siakaluk, P. D., & Goodyear, B. G. (2012). The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00022
  • Hargreaves, I. S., Pexman, P. M., Johnson, J., & Zdrazilova, L. (2012). Richer concepts are better remembered: Number of features effects in free recall. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00073
  • Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
  • Hommel, B., & Zmigrod, S. (2013). Feature Integration across multimodal perception and action: A review. Multisensory Research, 26, 143–157. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002390
  • Ilan, A. B., & Miller, J. (1994). A violation of pure insertion: Mental rotation and choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 520–536.
  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1968). The growth of logical thinking. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
  • Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Crognale, M. A., & Kunde, W. (2012). Effective rotations: Action effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 489–501. doi: 10.1037/a0026997
  • Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007). Maintaining readiness for mental rotation interferes with perceptual processes in children but with response selection in adults. Acta Psychologica, 126, 155–168. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.005
  • Jansen, P., Fraunhofer, L., & Pietsch, S. (2018). Cognitive motor coordination training and the improvement of visual-spatial cognition in office work. International Journal of Training and Development, 22, 233–238. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12131
  • Jansen, P., Lange, L., & Heil, M. (2011). The influence of juggling on mental rotation performance in children. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 3, 149. doi: 10.2478/v10101-011-0005-6
  • Jansen, P., Lehmann, J., & van Doren, J. (2012). Mental rotation performance in male soccer players. PLoS One, 7(10), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048620
  • Jansen, P., Quaiser-Pohl, C., Neuburger, S., & Ruthsatz, V. (2015). Factors influencing mental-rotation with action-based gender-stereotyped objects—The role of fine motor skills. Current Psychology, 34, 466–476. doi: 10.1007/s12144-014-9269-7
  • Jongsma, M. L. A., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Okely, J., Baas, C. M., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Steenbergen, B. (2013). Effects of hand orientation on motor imagery—Event related potentials suggest kinesthetic motor imagery to solve the hand laterality judgment task. PLoS One, 8(9), e76515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076515
  • Kail, R., & Park, Y.-s. (1990). Impact of practice on speed of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 227–244. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(90)90056-E
  • Kosslyn, S. (1994). The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Kosslyn, S., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 635–642. doi: 10.1038/35090055
  • Kosslyn, S., Margolis, J. A., Barrett, A. M., Goldknopf, E. J., & Daly, P. F. (1990). Age differences in imagery abilities. Child Development, 61, 995. doi: 10.2307/1130871
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2010). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Lehmann, J., Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Jansen, P. (2014). Correlation of motor skill, mental rotation, and working memory in 3- to 6-year-old children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 560–573. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2014.888995
  • Leone, G., Taine, M. C., & Droulez, J. (1993). The influence of long-term practice on mental rotation of 3-D objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 241–255. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(93)90008-S
  • Leversen, J. S. R., Haga, M., & Sigmundsson, H. (2012). From children to adults: Motor performance across the life-span. PLoS One, 7(6), e38830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038830
  • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Lohmann, J., Rolke, B., & Butz, M. V. (2017). In touch with mental rotation: Interactions between mental and tactile rotations and motor responses. Experimental Brain Research, 235(4), 1063–1079. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4861-8
  • Lorås, H., & Sigmundsson, H. (2012). Interrelations between three fine motor skills in young adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115, 171–178. doi: 10.2466/10.25.27.PMS.115.4.171-178
  • Luo, Z., Jose, P. E., Huntsinger, C. S., & Pigott, T. D. (2007). Fine motor skills and mathematics achievement in East Asian American and European American kindergartners and first graders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 595–614. doi: 10.1348/026151007X185329
  • Madan, C. R., & Singhal, A. (2012). Motor imagery and higher-level cognition: Four hurdles before research can sprint forward. Cognitive Processing, 13, 211–229. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0438-z
  • Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Durand, A., Descent, M., Poiré, D., Frémont, P., … Doyon, J. (2009). Effects of practice, visual loss, limb amputation, and disuse on motor imagery vividness. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 449–463. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328733
  • Maouene, J., Hidaka, S., & Smith, L. (2008). Body parts and early-learned verbs. Cognitive Science: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 1200–1216. doi: 10.1080/03640210802019997
  • Maouene, J., Sethuraman, N., Laakso, A., & Maouene, M. (2011). The body region correlates of concrete and abstract verbs in early child language. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: Aan Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 449–484.
  • Martzog, P., Stoeger, H., & Suggate, S. P. (2019). Relations between preschool children’s fine motor skills and general cognitive abilities. Journal of Cognition and Development.
  • Martzog, P., & Suggate, S. P. (2019). Fine motor skills and mental imagery: Is it all in the mind? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186, 59–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.002
  • Moreau, D., Clerc, J., Mansy-Dannay, A., & Guerrien, A. (2012). Enhancing spatial ability through sport practice. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 83–88. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000075
  • Oswald, W. D., & Roth, E. (1987). Der Zahlen-Verbindungs-test-ZVT. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Papeo, L., Vallesi, A., Isaja, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2009). Effects of TMS on different stages of motor and non-motor verb processing in the primary motor cortex. PLoS One, 4(2), e4508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004508
  • Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184–202. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.3
  • Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 709–730. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.709
  • Penner-Wilger, M., & Anderson, M. L. (2013). The relation between finger gnosis and mathematical ability: Why redeployment of neural circuits best explains the finding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00877
  • Petermann, F., Bös, K., & Kastner, J. (2011). Movement assessment battery for children – Second edition. Frankfurt am Main: Pearson Assessment.
  • Postle, N., McMahon, K. L., Ashton, R., Meredith, M., & Zubicaray, G. I. d. (2008). Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices. NeuroImage, 43, 634–644. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.006
  • Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576–582. doi: 10.1038/nrn1706
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 157–182. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000043
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Canada: Sage Publications.
  • Reitan, R. M. (1956). Trail making test. Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Shenton, J. T., Schwoebel, J., & Coslett, H. B. (2004). Mental motor imagery and the body schema: Evidence for proprioceptive dominance. Neuroscience Letters, 370(1), 19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.053
  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
  • Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R. (2008a). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect. Cognition, 106, 433–443. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011
  • Siakaluk, P., Pexman, P., Sears, C., Wilson, K., Locheed, K., & Owen, W. (2008b). The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: Body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 591–605. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035399
  • Sidhu, D. M., Kwan, R., Pexman, P. M., & Siakaluk, P. D. (2014). Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing of verbs. Acta Psychologica, 149, 32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.009
  • Suggate, S., Pufke, E., & Stoeger, H. (2018). Do fine motor skills contribute to early reading development? Journal of Research in Reading, 41, 1–19. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12081
  • Suggate, S., Pufke, E., & Stoeger, H. (2019). Children’s fine motor skills in kindergarten predict reading in grade 1. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47, 248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.12.015
  • Suggate, S., & Stoeger, H. (2017). Fine motor skills enhance lexical processing of embodied vocabulary: A test of the nimble-hands, nimble-minds hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 2169–2187. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1227344
  • Suggate, S. P., & Stoeger, H. (2014). Do nimble hands make for nimble lexicons? Fine motor skills predict knowledge of embodied vocabulary items. First Language, 34, 244–261. doi: 10.1177/0142723714535768
  • Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M., Gallese, V., Danna, M., & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 273–281. doi: 10.1162/0898929053124965
  • Tomasino, B., Werner, C. J., Weiss, P. H., & Fink, G. R. (2007). Stimulus properties matter more than perspective: An fMRI study of mental imagery and silent reading of action phrases. NeuroImage, 36(Suppl. 2), 41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.035
  • Vernon, P. A. (1993). Der Zahlen-Verbindungstest and other trail-making correlates of general intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 35–40. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90172-Y
  • Voyer, D., & Jansen, P. (2017). Motor expertise and performance in spatial tasks: A meta-analysis. Human Movement Science, 54, 110–124. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.004
  • Voyer, D., Jansen, P., & Kaltner, S. (2017). Mental rotation with egocentric and object-based transformations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 2319–2330. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1233571
  • Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). The influence of bodily experience on children’s language processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 425–441. doi: 10.1111/tops.12092
  • Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S., & Bertholz A, M. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68, 77–94. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00032-8
  • Wiedenbauer, G., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Manual training of mental rotation in children. Learning and Instruction, 18, 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.009
  • Wiedenbauer, G., Schmid, J., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2007). Manual training of mental rotation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 17–36. doi: 10.1080/09541440600709906
  • Willems, R. M., Labruna, L., D’Esposito, M., Ivry, R., & Casasanto, D. (2011). A functional role for the motor system in language understanding: Evidence from theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. Psychological Science, 22, 849–854. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412387
  • Wohlschläger, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24, 397–412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.397
  • Wohlschläger, A. W. A. (1988). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 397–412.
  • Zack, R., Suggate, S., & Stoeger, H. (2017). Understanding the link between motor and vocabulary development: Body-Object-Interaction or Body-Part-Association? Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Dresden 20–23 March, Dresden.
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.