“They all still look the same to me”: Navon processing and the cross-race effect

References

• Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19–25. doi: 10.1177/0146167289151002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham, J. C. (1981). Accuracy of eyewitness evidence: How do attorneys see it? Social Action and the Law, 7, 76–79.
   Google Scholar
• Brigham, J. C., & Barkowitz, P. (1978). Do they all look alike? The effect of race, sex, experience, and attitudes on the ability to recognize faces. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 306–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00786.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham, J. C., Bennett, L., Meissner, C. A., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The influence of race on eyewitness memory. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. II. Memory for people (pp. 257–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., van Beest, I., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Scorolli, C., Dorchin, S., Meiran, N., … Hommel, B. (2010). God: Do I have your attention? Cognition, 117, 87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2010). Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 602–606. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2014). Lost in the forest, stuck in the trees: Dispositional global/local bias is resistant to exposure to high and low spatial frequencies. PloS one, 9(7), e98625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., Flevaris, A. V., Robertson, L. C., & Bentin, S. (2011). Priming global and local processing of composite faces: Revisiting the processing-bias effect on face perception. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 73(5), 1477–1486. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0109-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. N., & Macgregor-Hannah, M. (2010). Disruptive effect of holistic bias on processing of other-race faces following face categorization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(2), 567–579. doi: 10.2466/pms.110.2.567-579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2007). Temporal limitation of Navon effect on face recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 501–509. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.2.501-509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2008). Testing alternatives to Navon letters to induce a transfer-inappropriate processing shift in face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 561–576. doi: 10.1080/09541440701728524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2009). A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. (2007). Local and global processing biases fail to influence face, object, and word recognition. Visual Cognition, 15(6), 710–740. doi: 10.1080/13506280601112519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(4), 559. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M., Mills, C., Hills, P. J., & Weston, N. (2009). Navon letters affect face learning and face retrieval. Experimental Psychology, 56, 258–264. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovén, J., Herlitz, A., & Rehnman, J. (2011). Women’s own-gender bias in face recognition memory. Experimental Psychology, 58, 333–340. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lux, S., Marshall, J. C., Thimm, M., & Fink, G. R. (2008). Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: Implications for pathology. Cortex, 44(1), 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2005.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, N. C., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194–196. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpass, R. S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own- and other-race faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 330–334. doi: 10.1037/h0028434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone, E., Davies, A. A., Fernando, D., Aalders, R., Leung, H., Wickramariyaratne, T., & Platow, M. J. (2010). Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention. Vision Research, 50(16), 1540–1549. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone, E., Martini, P., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 573–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Twenty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory of faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Caldara, R., & Rossion, B. (2006). Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Visual Cognition, 14(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1080/13506280500158761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one’s own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfect, T. J. (2003). Local processing bias impairs line-up performance. Psychological Reports, 93, 393–394. doi: 10.2466/PR0.93.6.393-394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfect, T. J., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. (2007). The effects of local and global processing orientation on eyewitness identification performance. Memory (Hove, England), 15, 784–798. doi: 10.1080/09658210701654627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfect, T. J., Weston, N. J., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. (2008). The effects of precedence on Navon-induced processing bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(10), 1479–1486.
   Google Scholar
• Podd, J. (1990). The effects of memory load and delay on facial recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350040105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Brake, S., Taylor, K., & Tan, S. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 313–331. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02323.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Ewing, L., Hayward, W. G., Maurer, D., Mondloch, C. J., & Tanaka, J. W. (2009). Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. British Journal of Psychology, 100(4), 717–728. doi: 10.1348/000712608X396503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2003). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New York: Penguin/New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Semmler, C., Brewer, N., & Douglass, A. B. (2012). Jurors believe eyewitnesses. In C. Semmler, N. Brewer, & A. B. Douglass (Eds.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research (pp. 185–209). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E., & Hattery, A. J. (2011). Race, wrongful conviction & exoneration. Journal of African American Studies, 15(1), 74–94. doi: 10.1007/s12111-010-9130-5
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., & Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93, B1–B9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, L., Crookes, K., Reynolds, K. J., Irons, J. L., & McKone, E. (2015). A cultural setting where the other-race effect on face recognition has no social–motivational component and derives entirely from lifetime perceptual experience. Cognition, 144, 91–115. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Olson, E., & Charman, S. (2003). Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, N. J., Perfect, T. J., Schooler, J. W., & Dennis, I. (2008). Navon processing and verbalisation: A holistic/featural distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 587–611. doi: 10.1080/09541440701728557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, L. H., & Lander, K. (2008). The effect of verbal description and processing type on face identification. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 577–586. doi: 10.1080/09541440701728433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2012). Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 116–142.
   Google Scholar
• Yovel, G., Wilmer, J. B., & Duchaine, B. (2014). What can individual differences reveal about face processing? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 562. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar