271
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Being observed detrimentally affects face perception

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 852-875 | Received 14 May 2019, Accepted 18 Oct 2019, Published online: 04 Nov 2019

References

  • Allport, F. H. (1920). The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(3), 159–182.
  • Althoff, R. R., & Cohen, N. J. (1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25(4), 997–1010.
  • Arizpe, J., Kravitz, D. J., Yovel, G., & Baker, C. I. (2012). Start position strongly influences fixation patterns during face processing: Difficulties with eye movements as a measure of information use. PloS one, 7(2), e31106.
  • Barton, J. J. (2008). Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: Lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2(1), 197–225.
  • Barton, J. J., Radcliffe, N., Cherkasova, M. V., Edelman, J., & Intriligator, J. M. (2006). Information processing during face recognition: The effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception, 35, 1089–1105.
  • Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 551–565.
  • Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 143–177.
  • Bindemann, M., Scheepers, C., & Burton, A. M. (2009). Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 7–7.
  • Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C., Fiset, D., & Caldara, R. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PlosOne, 3, e3022.
  • Bombari, D., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2009). Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns. Perception, 38(10), 1508–1521.
  • Broadbent, D. E. (1965). A reformulation of the Yerkes‐Dodson law. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18(2), 145–157.
  • Burton, A. M., Schweinberger, S. R., Jenkins, R., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2015). Arguments against a configural processing account of familiar face recognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 482–496.
  • Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. London: Academic Press.
  • Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270–295.
  • Chajut, E., & Algom, D. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 231.
  • Chan, J. P. K., & Ryan, J. D. (2012). Holistic representations of internal and external face features are used to support recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 87. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00087
  • CNBC. (2012). CNBC Wiki. Retrieved from http://wiki.cnbc.cmu.edu/Objects
  • Collins, K. A., Westra, H. A., Dozois, D. J., & Stewart, S. H. (2005). The validity of the brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19(3), 345–359.
  • Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(4), 354.
  • Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 245.
  • Daly, S. (1978). Behavioural correlates of social anxiety. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(2), 117–120.
  • Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D. E., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 316–328.
  • Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687–706.
  • Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107–117.
  • Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66(3), 183.
  • Echterhoff, G., & Hirst, W. (2009). Social influence on memory. Social Psychology, 40(3), 106–110.
  • Edelson, M., Sharot, T., Dolan, R. J., & Dudai, Y. (2011). Following the crowd: Brain substrates of long-term memory conformity. Science, 333(6038), 108–111.
  • Ellis, H. D. (1981). Theoretical aspects of face recognition. In G. M. Davies, H. D. Ellis, & J. W. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 171–200). London: Academic Press.
  • Ellis, H. D., Deregowski, J. B., & Shepherd, J. W. (1975). Descriptions of White and Black faces by White and Black subjects. International Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 119–123.
  • Field, A. (2010). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
  • Gauthier, I., McGugin, R. W., Richler, J. J., Herzmann, G., Speegle, M., & Van Gulick, A. E. (2014). Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 7.
  • Germine, L. T., Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2011). Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30. Cognition, 118(2), 201–210.
  • Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 32–41.
  • Goldinger, S. D., He, Y., & Papesh, M. H. (2009). Deficits in cross-race face learning: Insights from eye movements and pupillometry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(5), 1105.
  • Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
  • Guo, K. (2012). Holistic gaze strategy to categorize facial expression of varying intensities. PLoS ONE, 7, e4285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042585
  • Haig, N. D. (1985). How faces differ – a new comparative technique. Perception, 14(5), 601–615. doi: 10.1068/p140601
  • Haig, N. D. (1986). Exploring recognition with interchanged facial features. Perception, 15(3), 235–247. doi: 10.1068/p150235
  • Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293(5539), 2425–2430.
  • Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51(1), 59–67.
  • Hills, P. J., Cooper, R. E., & Pake, J. M. (2013a). Removing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses to diagnostic features: An eye-tracking study. Visual Cognition, 21(7), 876–898.
  • Hills, P. J., Cooper, R. E., & Pake, J. M. (2013b). First fixations in face processing: The more diagnostic they are the smaller the face-inversion effect. Acta Psychologica, 142(2), 211–219.
  • Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2011). Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses preceding the lower half of a face. Visual Cognition, 19(3), 313–339.
  • Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2018). The development of face expertise: Evidence for a qualitative change in processing. Cognitive Development, 48, 1–18.
  • Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45(1–3), 73–93.
  • Hole, G. J., George, P. A., Eaves, K., & Rasek, A. (2002). Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance. Perception, 31(10), 1221–1240.
  • Holroyd, K. A., Westbrook, T., Wolf, M., & Badhorn, E. (1978). Performance, cognition, and physiological responding in test anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(4), 442–451.
  • Horley, K., Williams, L. M., Gonsalvez, C., & Gordon, E. (2003). Social phobics do not see eye to eye: A visual scanpath study of emotional expression processing. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17(1), 33–44.
  • Hosie, J. A., Ellis, H. D., & Haig, N. D. (1988). The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces. Perception, 17(4), 461–474. doi: 10.1068/p170461
  • Hugenberg, K., Miller, J., & Claypool, H. M. (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 334–340.
  • Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1168.
  • Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., Blackstock, E., & Schmader, T. (2010). Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 208–212.
  • Janik, S. W., Wellens, A. R., Goldberg, M. L., & Dell'Osso, L. F. (1978). Eyes as the center of focus in the visual examination of human faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(3), 857–858.
  • Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311.
  • Lambert, A. J., Payne, B. K., Jacoby, L. L., Shaffer, L. M., Chasteen, A. L., & Khan, S. R. (2003). Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the “social facilitation” of prejudice in anticipated public contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 277–295.
  • Lambourne, K., & Tomporowski, P. (2010). The effect of exercise-induced arousal on cognitive task performance: A meta-regression analysis. Brain Research, 1341, 12–24.
  • Leary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(3), 371–375.
  • Leder, H., & Carbon, C. C. (2005). When context hinders! Learn–test compatibility in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(2), 235–250.
  • Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(4), 559–574.
  • Lewis, M. B., & Hills, P. J. (2018). Perceived race affects configural processing but not holistic processing in the composite-face task. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01456
  • Light, L. L., Hollander, S., & Kayra-Stuart, F. (1981). Why attractive people are harder to remember. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 269–276.
  • Loftus, G. R. (1978). On interpretation of interactions. Memory & Cognition, 6(3), 312–319.
  • Logie, R. H., Baddeley, A. D., & Woodhead, M. M. (1987). Face recognition, pose and ecological validity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1(1), 53–69.
  • Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2010). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mandler, G., & Sarason, S. B. (1952). A study of anxiety and learning. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(2), 166.
  • Marcon, J. L., Meissner, C. A., Frueh, M., Susa, K. J., & MacLin, O. H. (2010). Perceptual identification and the cross-race effect. Visual Cognition, 18(5), 767–779.
  • Marcon, J. L., Susa, K. J., & Meissner, C. A. (2009). Assessing the influence of recollection and familiarity in memory for own- versus other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 99–103.
  • Markus, H. (1978). The effect of mere presence on social facilitation: An unobtrusive test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 389–397.
  • Maurer, D., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260.
  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299–325.
  • McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13–23.
  • Megreya, A. M., & Burton, A. M. (2006). Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition, 34(4), 865–876.
  • Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35.
  • Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Butz, D. A. (2005). Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 545–567.
  • Mendl, M. (1999). Performing under pressure: Stress and cognitive function. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65(3), 221–244.
  • Michel, C., Caldara, R., & Rossion, B. (2006). Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Visual Cognition, 14(1), 55–73.
  • Michel, C., Corneille, O., & Rossion, B. (2007). Race categorization modulates holistic face encoding. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 911–924.
  • Miellet, S., Vizioli, L., He, L., Zhou, X., & Caldara, R. (2013). Mapping face recognition information use across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, e34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00034
  • Minear, M. E., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods: Instruments and Computers, 36(4), 630–633.
  • Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2002). Selective orientation to masked threat faces in social anxiety. Behaviour, Research, and Therapy, 409(2), 1403–1414.
  • Mondloch, C. J., & Desjarlais, M. (2010). The function and specificity of sensitivity to cues to facial identity: An individual-differences approach. Perception, 39(6), 819–829.
  • Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(5), 555–604.
  • Mukudi, P. B., & Hills, P. J. (2019). The combined influence of the own-age,-gender, and-ethnicity biases on face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 194, 1–6.
  • Nist, P., & Diehl, M. (1990). PHCC test anxiety questionnaire. Retrieved Aug, 20, 2010.
  • Payne, B. K., Jacoby, L. L., & Lambert, A. J. (2004). Memory monitoring and the control of stereotype distortion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 52–64.
  • Pearce, D. (2012). Roads to commensurability (Vol. 187). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Pessin, J. (1933). The comparative effects of social and mechanical stimulation on memorizing. The American Journal of Psychology, 45(2), 263–270.
  • Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2016). [E-Prime 3.0]. Retrieved from https://www.pstnet.com
  • Reysen, M. B. (2007). The effects of social pressure on false memories. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 59–65.
  • Rezlescu, C., Susilo, T., Wilmer, J. B., & Caramazza, A. (2017). The inversion, part-whole, and composite effects reflect distinct perceptual mechanisms with varied relationships to face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(12), 1961.
  • Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Beliefs alter holistic face processing … if response bias is not taken into account. Journal of Vision, 11(13), 17–17.
  • Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1281.
  • Richmond, V. P., Wrench, J. S., & Gorham, J. (2001). Communication, affect, and learning in the classroom. Acton, MA: Tapestry Press.
  • Rosenthal, R., & Fode, K. L. (1963). The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 8(3), 183–189.
  • Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 274–289. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
  • Rossion, B. (2013). The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception. Visual Cognition, 21(2), 139–253.
  • Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Despland, P., Bruyer, R., Linotte, S., & Crommelinck, M. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport, 11(1), 69–72.
  • Schneier, F. R., Rodebaugh, T. L., Blanco, C., Lewin, H., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2011). Fear and avoidance of eye contact in social anxiety disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 52(1), 81–87.
  • Shepherd, J. W., & Deregowski, J. B. (1981). Races and faces – a comparison of the responses of Africans and Europeans to faces of the same and different races. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20(2), 125–133.
  • Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 36–97.
  • Sæther, L., Van Belle, W., Laeng, B., Brennen, T., & Øvervoll, M. (2009). Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces’ sex: Evidence from eye-tracking data. Vision Research, 49(23), 2870–2880.
  • Swann, W. B. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91(4), 457.
  • Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46(2), 225–245.
  • Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44(4), 671–703.
  • Valentine, T., & Mesout, J. (2009). Eyewitness identification under stress in the London Dungeon. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 23(2), 151–161.
  • Vallano, J. P., & Compo, N. S. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport‐building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock‐crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 960–970.
  • Wagenmakers, E. J., Krypotos, A. M., Criss, A. H., & Iverson, G. (2012). On the interpretation of removable interactions: A survey of the field 33 years after Loftus. Memory & Cognition, 40(2), 145–160.
  • Wieser, M. J., Pauli, P., Alpers, G. W., & Mühlberger, A. (2009). Is eye to eye contact really threatening and avoided in social anxiety? —An eye-Tracking and Psychophysiology Study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(1), 93–103.
  • Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 963–976.
  • Wright, D. B., London, K., & Waechter, M. (2010). Social anxiety moderates memory conformity in adolescents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(7), 1034–1045.
  • Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482.
  • Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141–145.
  • Young, A. W., & Burton, A. M. (2018). Are we face experts? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 100–110.
  • Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747–759.
  • Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2012). Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 116–142.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274.
  • Zajonc, R. B., & Sales, S. M. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(1), 160–168.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.