589
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Understanding self-prioritisation: the prioritisation of self-relevant stimuli and its relation to the individual self-esteem

&
Pages 813-824 | Received 01 Apr 2019, Accepted 24 Oct 2019, Published online: 12 Nov 2019

References

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331–335. doi: 10.3758/BF03196169
  • Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., Macdonald, L. M., & Neil Macrae, C. (2008). Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 312–318. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.003
  • Devue, C., & Bredart, S. (2008). Attention to self-referential stimuli: Can I ignore my own face? Acta Psychologica, 128, 290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.004
  • Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2015). Measures of self-esteem. In G. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matt (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 131–157). London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
  • Frings, C. (2006). Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 322–327. doi: 10.3758/BF03193851
  • Frings, C., Schneider, K. K., & Fox, E. (2015). The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1577–1597. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0841-4
  • Frings, C., Wentura, D., & Holtz, M. (2007). Dysphorics cannot ignore unpleasant information. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1525–1534. doi: 10.1080/02699930601054042
  • Fuentes, L. J., Sui, J., Estévez, A. F., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). The differential outcomes procedure can overcome self-bias in perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 451–458. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0895-3
  • Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5
  • Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d’. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 27, 46–51. doi:10.3758/BF03203619.
  • Hommel, B. (2019). Representing oneself and others. Experimental Psychology, 65, 323–331. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000433
  • Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2016). Attentional control and the self: The self-attention network (SAN). Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 5–17. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427
  • Janczyk, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2018). The central locus of self-prioritization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–6. doi: 10.1177/1747021818778970
  • Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Jiang, M., Wong, S. K. M., Chung, H. K. S., Sun, Y., Hsiao, J. H., Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2019). Cultural orientation of self-bias in perceptual matching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01469
  • Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, A. J., … Morey, R. D. (2015). JASP (Version 0.7) [computer software]. Amsterdam.
  • Macrae, C. N., Visokomogilski, A., Golubickis, M., Cunningham, W. A., & Sahraie, A. (2017). Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 438–443.
  • Miyakoshi, M., Nomura, M., & Ohira, H. (2007). An ERP study on self-relevant object recognition. Brain and Cognition, 63, 182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.12.001
  • Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56–60. doi: 10.1080/17470215908416289
  • Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444–450. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.444
  • Noel, J.-P., Blanke, O., Serino, A., & Salomon, R. (2017). Interplay between narrative and bodily self in access to consciousness: No difference between self-and non-self attributes. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00072
  • Northoff, G. (2016). Is the self a higher-order or fundamental function of the brain? The “basis model of self-specificity” and its encoding by the brain’s spontaneous activity. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 203–222. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1111868
  • O'Brien, R., & Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 316–333. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.316
  • Reuther, J., & Chakravarthi, R. (2017). Does self-prioritization affect perceptual processes? Visual Cognition, 25, 381–398. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1323813
  • Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (Revised edition). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  • Schäfer, S., & Frings, C. (2019). Searching for the inner self: Evidence against a direct dependence of the self-prioritization effect on the ventro-medial prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 237, 247–256. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5413-1
  • Schäfer, S., Wentura, D., & Frings, C. (2015). Self-prioritization beyond perception. Experimental Psychology, 62, 415–425. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000307
  • Schäfer, S., Wentura, D., & Frings, C. (2017). Distinctiveness effects in self-prioritization. Visual Cognition, 25, 399–411. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1346739
  • Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual “cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 504–514. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.2.504
  • Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 137–149. doi:10.3758/BF03207704.
  • Stein, T., Siebold, A., & van Zoest, W. (2016). Testing the idea of privileged awareness of self-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 303–307. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000197
  • Sui, J., Enock, F., Ralph, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). Dissociating hyper and hypoself biases to a core self-representation. Cortex, 70, 202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.024
  • Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1105–1117. doi: 10.1037/a0029792
  • Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015a). The interaction between self-bias and reward: Evidence for common and distinct processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1952–1964. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1023207
  • Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015b). Super-size me: Self biases increase to larger stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 550–558. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0690-6
  • Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2017). Aging enhances cognitive biases to friends but not the self. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 2012–2030. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1264-1
  • Sui, J., Liu, M., Mevorach, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). The salient self: The left intraparietal sulcus responds to social as well as perceptual-salience after self-association. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1060–1068. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht302
  • Sui, J., Ohrling, E., & Humphreys, G. W. (2016). Negative mood disrupts self- and reward-biases in perceptual matching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1438–1448. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1122069
  • Sui, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 7607–7612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221862110
  • Sui, J., Sun, Y., Peng, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (2014). The automatic and the expected self: Separating self- and familiarity biases effects by manipulating stimulus probability. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1176–1184. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0631-5
  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  • von Collani, G., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 3–7. doi: 10.1024//0170-1789.24.1.3
  • Wade, G. L., & Vickery, T. J. (2017). Self-relevance effects and label choice: Strong variations in label-matching performance due to non-self-relevant factors. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79, 1524–1534. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1307-8
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426–432. doi: 10.1037/a0022790
  • Wagner, D. D., Haxby, J. V., & Heatherton, T. F. (2012). The representation of self and person knowledge in the medial prefrontal cortex. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3, 451–470. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1183
  • Woźniak, M., & Knoblich, G. (2019). Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, doi: 10.1177/1747021819832981
  • Zhou, A., Shi, Z., Zhang, P., Liu, P., Han, W., Wu, H., … Xia, R. (2010). An ERP study on the effect of self-relevant possessive pronoun. Neuroscience Letters, 480, 162–166. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.033

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.