References
- Baayen, H., Bates, D. M., Kliegl, R., & Vasishth, S. (2015). Repsychling: Data sets from psychology and linguistics experiments. R package version 0.0.4. Retrieved from https://github.com/dmbates/RePsychLing.
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967.
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Becker, N., Schmitz, F., Göritz, A., & Spinath, F. (2016). Sometimes more is better, and sometimes less is better: Task complexity moderates the response time accuracy correlation. Journal of Intelligence, 4(3), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence4030011
- Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115
- Burton, A. M., Schweinberger, S. R., Jenkins, R., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2015). Arguments against a configural processing account of familiar face recognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615583129
- Ćepulić, D. B., Wilhelm, O., Sommer, W., & Hildebrandt, A. (2018). All categories are equal, but some categories are more equal than others: The psychometric structure of object and face cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1254–1268. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000511
- Chung, Y., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Dorie, V., Gelman, A., & Liu, J. (2013). A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models. Psychometrika, 78(4), 685–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9328-2
- De Boeck, P., Bakker, M., Zwitser, R., Nivard, M., Hofman, A., Tuerlinckx, F., & Partchev, I. (2011). The estimation of item response models with the lmer function from the lme4 package in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(12), 28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v039.i12
- Dennett, H. W., McKone, E., Tavashmi, R., Hall, A., Pidcock, M., Edwards, M., & Duchaine, B. (2012). The Cambridge Car memory test: A task matched in format to the Cambridge face memory test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0160-2
- Downing, P. E., Chan, A. W., Peelen, M. V., Dodds, C. M., & Kanwisher, N. (2006). Domain specificity in visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 16(10), 1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj086
- Duchaine, B. C., Yovel, G., Butterworth, E. J., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(5), 714–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290500441296
- Eimer, M. (2011). The face-Sensitive N170 component of the event-related brain potential. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 329–344). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An {R} companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3012
- Gauthier, I., McGugin, R. W., Richler, J. J., Herzmann, G., Speegle, M., & Van Gulick, A. E. (2014). Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability. Journal of Vision, 14, 8. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.8.7
- Goffaux, V., & Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are “spatial"-holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1023
- Goffaux, V., & Rossion, B. (2007). Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.995
- Goldhammer, F., & Klein Entink, R. H. (2011). Speed of reasoning and its relation to reasoning ability. Intelligence, 39(2–3), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.02.001
- Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., & Greiff, S. (2015). More is not always better: The relation between item response and item response time in Raven’s matrices. Journal of Intelligence, 3(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3010021
- Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., & Keßel, Y. (2013). Assessing individual differences in basic computer skills: Psychometric characteristics of an interactive performance measure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000153
- Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., Stelter, A., Tóth, K., Rölke, H., & Klieme, E. (2014). The time on task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by task difficulty and skill: Insights from a computer-based large-scale assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034716
- Grill-Spector, K., Knouf, N., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nature Neuroscience, 7(5), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1224
- Harel, A. (2016). What is special about expertise? Visual expertise reveals the interactive nature of real-world object recognition. Neuropsychologia, 83, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.004
- Hildebrandt, A., Sommer, W., Herzmann, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2010). Structural invariance and age-related performance differences in face cognition. Psychology and Aging, 25(4), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019774
- Hildebrandt, A., Wilhelm, O., Herzmann, G., & Sommer, W. (2013). Face and object cognition across adult age. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031490
- Inquisit 4 [Computer software]. (2012). Retrieved from http://millisecond.com.
- Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
- Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997
- Kanwisher, N., & Yovel, G. (2006). The fusiform face area: A cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2109–2128. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1934
- Klein Entink, R. H., Fox, J.-P., & van der Linden, W. J. (2009). A multivariate multilevel approach to the modeling of accuracy and speed of test takers. Psychometrika, 74(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9075-y
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models (Version R package version 2.0-33). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
- Lesnoff, M., & Lancelot, R. (2012). aod: Analysis of overdispersed data (Version R package version 1.3). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=aod.
- Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
- Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
- Maurer, D., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4.
- McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105(4), 724–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.734-760.
- McGugin, R. W., Richler, J. J., Herzmann, G., Speegle, M., & Gauthier, I. (2012). The Vanderbilt expertise test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition. Vision Research, 69, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.014
- McKone, E. (2010). Face and object recognition: How do they differ? In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Tutorials in visual cognition (pp. 261–304). Psychology Press.
- McKone, E., & Robbins, R. (2011). Are faces special? In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 149–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- McKone, E., & Yovel, G. (2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 778–797. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.16.5.778
- Meyer, K., Schmitz, F., Wilhelm, O., & Hildebrandt, A. (2019). Perceiving faces: Too much, too fast? Face specificity in response caution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(1), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000582.
- Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(5), 555–604. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555
- Naumann, J., & Goldhammer, F. (2017). Time-on-task effects in digital reading are non-linear and moderated by persons’ skills and tasks’ demands. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.002
- Nowparast Rostami, H., Sommer, W., Zhou, C., Wilhelm, O., & Hildebrandt, A. (2017). Structural encoding processes contribute to individual differences in face and object cognition: Inferences from psychometric test performance and event-related brain potentials. Cortex, 95, 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.017
- Piepers, D. W., & Robbins, R. A. (2012). A review and clarification of the terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the face perception literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00559
- Powell, M. J. (2009). The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives [Cambridge NA Report NA2009/06]. University of Cambridge, pp. 26–46.
- R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
- Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1281–1302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037004
- Richler, J. J., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2012). Meanings, mechanisms, and measures of holistic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 553–553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00553
- Robbins, R., & McKone, E. (2007). No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition, 103(1), 34–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.008
- Roskam, E. E. (1997). Models for speed and time-limit tests. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 187–208). Springer New York.
- Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128(2), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
- Rossion, B. (2013). The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception. Visual Cognition, 21(2), 139–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.772929
- Scherer, R., Greiff, S., & Hautamäki, J. (2015). Exploring the relation between time on task and ability in complex problem solving. Intelligence, 48, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.10.003
- Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03209391
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
- Sunday, M., Dodd, M. D., Tomarken, A. J., & Gauthier, I. (2018). How faces (and cars) may become special. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.12.007
- Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A Human Experimental Psychology, 46(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401045
- Tanaka, J. W., & Simonyi, D. (2016). The “parts and wholes” of face recognition: A review of the literature. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(10), 1876–1889. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780
- Trafimow, D. (2016). The attenuation of correlation coefficients: A statistical literacy issue. Teaching Statistics, 38(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12087
- Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466219922031329
- Voss, A., Nagler, M., & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology: A practical introduction. Experimental Psychology, 60(6), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000218
- Wickham, H. (2016). tidyr: Easily tidy data with `spread()` and `gather()` functions. R package version 0.4.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr.
- Wickham, H., & Francois, R. (2015). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.4.3. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
- Wilhelm, O., Herzmann, G., Kunina, O., Danthiir, V., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2010). Individual differences in perceiving and recognizing faces-one element of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019972
- Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027474
- Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1068/p160747