References
- Alvarez, G. A. (2011). Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003
- Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00327
- Brady, T. F., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011). Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: Ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items. Psychological Science, 22(3), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610397956
- Carragher, D. J. (2018). Social perception in group scenes: Social context modulates perceptions of facial attractiveness [Doctoral dissertation]. Flinders University, Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20048.56326
- Carragher, D. J., Lawrence, B. J., Thomas, N. A., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2018). Visuospatial asymmetries do not modulate the cheerleader effect. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 2548. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20784-5
- Carragher, D. J., Thomas, N. A., Gwinn, O. S., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2019). Limited evidence of hierarchical encoding in the cheerleader effect. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9329. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45789-6
- Crouzet, S. M., Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2010). Fast saccades toward faces: Face detection in just 100 ms. Journal of Vision, 10(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.4.16
- de Fockert, J., & Wolfenstein, C. (2009). Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets of faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(9), 1716–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902811249
- Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
- Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but … : A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Gerger, G., Forster, M., & Leder, H. (2017). It felt fluent but I did not like it: Fluency effects in faces versus patterns. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1145705
- Gilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. G. (1986). Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00217.x
- Griffiths, S., Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Palermo, R., & Neumann, M. F. (2018). The average facial expression of a crowd influences impressions of individual expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(2), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000446
- Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2007). Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces. Current Biology, 17(17), R751–R753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.039
- Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2009). Seeing the mean: Ensemble coding for sets of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 718–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013899
- JASP Team. (2019). JASP (Version 0.11.1)[Computer software].
- Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
- Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x
- Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge university press.
- Lew, T. F., & Vul, E. (2015). Ensemble clustering in visual working memory biases location memories and reduces the Weber noise of relative positions. Journal of Vision, 15(4), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.4.10
- Li, H., Ji, L., Tong, K., Ren, N., Chen, W., Liu, C. H., & Fu, X. (2016). Processing of individual items during ensemble coding of facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01332
- McDowell, J., & Starratt, V. G. (2019). Experimental examination and extension of the cheerleader effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.004
- Neumann, M. F., Ng, R., Rhodes, G., & Palermo, R. (2017). Ensemble coding of face identity is not independent of the coding of individual identity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(6), 1357–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1318409
- Neumann, M. F., Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2013). Viewers extract mean and individual identity from sets of famous faces. Cognition, 128(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.006
- Rashidi, M., Pazhoohi, F., & Hosseinchari, M. (2012). Effect of facial stimuli exposure time on evaluation of facial attractiveness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00050.x
- Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
- Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
- Rodeheffer, C. D., Proffitt Leyva, R. P., & Hill, S. E. (2016). Attractive female romantic partners provide a proxy for unobservable male qualities: The when and why behind human female mate choice copying. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2), 1474704916652144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916652144
- Saegusa, C., & Watanabe, K. (2016). Judgments of facial attractiveness as a combination of facial parts information over time: Social and aesthetic factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000149
- Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime (version 2.0). Computer software and manual]. Psychology Software Tools Inc.
- Stockemer, D., & Praino, R. (2015). Blinded by beauty? Physical attractiveness and candidate selection in the US house of representatives. Social Science Quarterly, 96(2), 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12155
- van Osch, Y., Blanken, I., Meijs, M. H., & van Wolferen, J. (2015). A group’s physical attractiveness is greater than the average attractiveness of its members: The group attractiveness effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215572799
- Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Epskamp, S. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
- Walker, D., & Vul, E. (2014). Hierarchical encoding makes individuals in a group seem more attractive. Psychological Science, 25(1), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613497969
- Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A., & Geiselman, R. E. (1987). A formal analysis of ratings of physical attractiveness: Successive contrast and simultaneous assimilation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23(3), 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(87)90034-5
- Whitney, D., & Yamanashi Leib, A. (2018). Ensemble perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044232
- Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
- Ying, H., Burns, E., Lin, X., & Xu, H. (2019). Ensemble statistics shape face adaptation and the cheerleader effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(3), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000564