References
- Blask, K., Frings, C., & Walther, E. (2016). Doing is for feeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1263–1268. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000211
- Blask, K., Walther, E., Halbeisen, G., & Weil, R. (2012). At the crossroads: Attention, contingency awareness, and evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 43(3), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2012.03.004/j.lmot.2012.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.03.004
- De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853–869. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853
- Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action–effect associations: Automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action–effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1701–1712. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000022
- Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229
- Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68(2-3), 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Frings, C., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Merkmalsintegration und Abruf als wichtige Prozesse der Handlungssteuerung – eine Paradigmen-übergreifende Perspektive [Feature integrationandretrievalascoreprocesses in actioncontrol - a cross-paradigmperspective]. Psychologische Rundschau, 71(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000423
- Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be … included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus–response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37(5), 1209–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023915
- Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2017). How perception guides action: Figure-ground segmentation modulates integration of context features into S-R episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1720–1729. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000403
- Gast, A., Langer, S., & Sengewald, M.-A. (2016). Evaluative conditioning increases with temporal contiguity. The influence of stimulus order and stimulus interval on evaluative conditioning. Acta Psychologica, 170, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.07.002
- Greville, W. J., & Buehner, M. J. (2010). Temporal predictability facilitates causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020976
- Henson, R., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. (2014). Stimulus–response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
- Herwig, A., Prinz, W., & Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(11), 1540–1554. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601119134
- Hommel, B., Alonso, D., & Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Acquisition and generalization of action effects. Visual Cognition, 10(8), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280344000176
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Hughes, S., De Houwer, J., & Perugini, M. (2016). Expanding the boundaries of evaluative learning research: How intersecting regularities shape our likes and dislikes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(6), 731–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000100
- James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000
- Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291091 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
- Kim, J. C., Sweldens, S., & Hütter, M. (2016). The symmetric nature of evaluative memory associations: Equal effectiveness of forward versus backward evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615599237
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Long term response-stimulus associations can influence distractor-response bindings. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 10(2), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0158-1
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2017). Dissociation of binding and learning processes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 2590–2605. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1393-7
- Moeller, B., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Frings, C. (2016). A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 1074–1086. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1
- Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford University Press.
- Pfister, R., Weller, L., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2017). What or when? The impact of anticipated social action effects is driven by action-effect compatibility, not delay. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7), 2132–2142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1371-0
- Postzich, C., Blask, K., Frings, C., & Walther, E. (2016). Timeless: A large sample study on the temporal robustness of affective responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. Article 841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00841
- Rydell, R. J., & Jones, C. R. (2009). Competition between unconditioned stimuli in attitude formation: Negative asymmetry versus spatio-temporal contiguity. Social Cognition, 27(6), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.905
- Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Psychology Software Tools Inc.
- Shanks, D. R., Pearson, S. M., & Dickinson, A. (1989). Temporal contiguity and the judgment of causality by human subjects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 139–159.
- Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. - J., van Doorn, J., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., … Morey, R. D. (2017). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
- Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2017). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical adavtanges and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
- Walther, E., Blask, K., Halbeisen, G., & Frings, C. (2019). An action control perspective of evaluative conditioning. European Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 271–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2019.1699743
- Wessa, M., Kanske, P., Neumeister, P., Bode, K., Heissler, J., & Schönfelder, S. (2010). EmoPics: Subjektive und psychophysiologische Evaluationen neuen Bildmaterials für die klinisch-bio-psychologische Forschung. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Supplementum, 1/11, 77. Retrievedfrom https://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/Emotional-Picture-System-EmoPicS.125575.0.html