References
- Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2013). Working memory across the lifespan: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.748027
- Almor, A., Arunachalam, S., & Strickland, B. (2007). When the creampuff beat the boxer: Working memory, cost, and function in reading metaphoric reference. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701235478
- Bateman, A. J. (2014). Text and image. Routledge.
- Bolognesi, M., & Strik Lievers, F. (2018). How language and image construct synaesthetic metaphors in print advertising. Visual Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218782001
- Bolognesi, M., Van den Heerik, R., & Van den Berg, E. (2018). Vismet 1.0 An online corpus of visual metaphors. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor structure and process (pp. 88–113). John Benjamins Publishing Compagny. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.04bol
- Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
- Bruffaerts, R., Tyler, K. L., Shafto, M., Tsvetanov, A., & Clark, A. (2019). Perceptual and conceptual processing of visual objects across the adult lifespan. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 13771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50254-5
- Bulmer, S., & Buchanan-Oliver, M. (2004). Meaningless or meaningful? Interpretation and intentionality in post-modern communication. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1352726042000207171
- Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., Steen, G. J., & Iepsma, M. A. (2015). Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: The effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.996200
- Cao, S., Wang, H., & Zou, X. (2018). The effect of visual structure of pictorial metaphors on advertisement attitudes. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(4), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v10n4p60
- Chang, C. T., & Yen, C. T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.749090
- Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34(2), 891B. (University Microfilms No. AAI05–77717).
- Daneman, M., & Merikle, M. P. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546
- Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11(6), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00290
- Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2013). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons.
- Forceville, C. (1998). Pictorial metaphor in advertising (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Forceville, C. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00007-8
- Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge University Press.
- Forceville, C. (2017). Visual and Multimodal metaphor in advertising: Cultural perspectives. Styles of Communication, 9(2), 26–41.
- Forceville, C. J. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Gardner, R., & Luchtenberg, S. (2000). Reference, image, text in German and Australian advertising posters. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1807–1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00117-4
- Huang, Y. (2018). Validating a modified typology of visual metaphor: Evidence from artful deviation, imagistic elaboration and ad attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1533489
- Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
- Koller, V. (2009). Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In C. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 45–71). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
- Lang, A., & Basil, M. D. (1998). Attention, resource allocation, and communication research: What do secondary task reaction times measure, anyway? Annals of the International Communication Association, 21(1), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1998.11678957
- Lee, S. Y., Jung, S., Jung, H. Y., Choi, S. T., & Oh, S. (2019). Imagination matters: Do consumers’ imagery processing and self-regulatory goals affect the persuasiveness of metaphor in advertising? International Journal of Advertising, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1596445
- Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(4), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210951
- Luck, J. S., & Vogel, K. E. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006
- Margariti, K., Boutsouki, C., Hatzithomas, L., & Zotos, Y. (2019). Visual metaphors in food advertising: A cross-cultural study. Food Research International, 115, 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.030
- Mashal, N. (2013). The role of working memory in the comprehension of unfamiliar and familiar metaphors. Language and Cognition, 5(4), 409–436. https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0024
- McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2005). Indirect persuasion in advertising. How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639188
- Nedeljković, U., Puškarević, I., Novaković, D., & Pinćjer, I. (2013). The effectiveness of sex appeal in print ads in relation to a visual register of the message: Articulating a new framework. Marketing, 44(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.5937/markt1303247N
- Ongchoco, J. D. K., & Scholl, B. J. (2019). Did that just happen? Event segmentation influences enumeration and working memory for simple overlapping visual events. Cognition, 187, 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.002
- Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., & Gyselinck, V. (2010). Working memory components in survey and route spatial text processing. Cognitive Processing, 11(4), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0353-0
- Peterson, M. O. (2019). Aspects of visual metaphor: An operational typology of visual rhetoric for research in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1447760
- Peterson, M., Wise, K., Ren, Y., Wang, Z., & Yao, J. (2017). Memorable metaphor: How different elements of visual rhetoric affect resource allocation and memory for advertisements. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 38(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2016.1233155
- Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1-2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044089
- Pierce, R. S., MacLaren, R., & Chiappe, D. L. (2010). The role of working memory in the metaphor interference effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.3.400
- Radvansky, A. G., & Copeland, E. D. (2004). Working memory span and situation model processing. American Journal of Psychology, 117(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149022
- Schilperoord, J. (2018). Ways with pictures: Visual incongruities and metaphor. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor structure and process (pp. 11–46). John Benjamins Publishing Compagny. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.02sch
- Šorm, E., & Steen, G. J. (2013). Processing visual metaphor: A study in thinking out loud. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.1.01sor
- Stampoulidis, G., Bolognesi, M., & Zlatev, J. (2019). A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-20192008
- Tasić, M., & Stamenković, D. (2015). The interplay of words and images in expressing multimodal metaphors in comics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 212, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.308
- Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 95–117). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Van den Heerik, R., Šorm, E., & Steen, G. (2018). Behavioral evidence for VISMIP. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphors structure and process (pp. 117–145). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.05van
- Van Hooft, A., Van Mulken, M., & Nedertigt, U. (2013). Cultural differences? Visual metaphor in advertising: comprehension and tolerance of ambiguity in four European countries. In S. Rosengren, M. Dahlén, & S. Okazaki (Eds.), Advances in advertising research (Vol. IV, pp. 351–364). EAA Series. Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02365-2_27
- Van Mulken, M., Le Pair, R., & Forceville, C. (2010). The impact of perceived complexity, deviation and comprehension on the appreciation of visual metaphor in advertising across three European countries. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3418–3430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.030
- Van Mulken, M., Van Hooft, A., & Nederstigt, U. (2014). Finding the Tipping point: Visual metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.920283
- Wingfield, A. (2016). Evolution of Models of working memory and cognitive resources. Ear and Hearing, 37, 35S–43S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000310