How highly creative product descriptions lead to attitude change: a dual-process model

References

• Aaker, D. A. (1975). Advertising management. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review (Print), 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/108886830934156
   Google Scholar
• Althuizen, N. (2017). Communicating a key benefit claim creatively and effectively through five conveyor properties. Psychology & Marketing, 34(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20970
   Google Scholar
• Ambler, T., & Hollier, E. A. (2004). The waste in advertising is the part that works. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(4), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021849904040413
   Google Scholar
• Ang, S. H., & Low, S. Y. M. (2000). Exploring the dimensions of ad creativity. Psychology and Marketing, 17(10), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17:10<835::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-#
   Google Scholar
• Areni, C. S. (2003). The effects of structural and grammatical variables on persuasion: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 20(4), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10077
   Google Scholar
• Batra, R., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Integrating marketing communications: New findings, new lessons, and new ideas. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0419
   Google Scholar
• Bilby, J., Reid, M., & Brennan, L. (2016). The future of advertising in China: Practitioner insights into the evolution of Chinese advertising creativity. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2016-018
   Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 33–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000003
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis (Ed.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 349–444). Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, J., & Jang, S. (2015). Effective destination advertising: Matching effect between advertising language and destination type. Tourism Management, 50, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0403_02
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., Inman, J. J., Kirmani, A., & Price, L. L. (2020). In times of trouble: A framework for understanding consumers’ responses to threats. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa036
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1086/314309
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Ledgerwood, A. (2011). A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. A. M. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of social psychology: Volume One (pp. 246–166). SAGE Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460
   Google Scholar
• Chan, E., & Sengupta, J. (2013). Observing flattery: A social comparison perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 740–758. https://doi.org/10.1086/672357
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. T., & Yen, C. T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.749090
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic–systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-Process Theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, L. (1990). The language of advertising. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90068-O
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., Rosengren, S., & Karsberg, J. (2018). The effects of signaling monetary and creative effort in ads: Advertising effort can go a long way influencing B2B clients, employees, and investors. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(4), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2018-013
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., Rosengren, S., & Törn, F. (2008). Advertising creativity matters. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.2501/S002184990808046X
   Google Scholar
• Darke, P. R., & Ritchie, R. J. B. (2007). The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.1.114
   Google Scholar
• Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
   Google Scholar
• DeSimone, J. A., & Harms, P. D. (2018). Dirty data: The effects of screening respondents who provide low-quality data in survey research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(5), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9514-9
   Google Scholar
• Deyoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
   Google Scholar
• Ducoffe, R. H. (1995). How consumers assess the value of advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising (CTC Press), 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.1995.10505022
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1086/209380
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J.-R., Lu, I.-W., Chen, J. H. F., & Farn, C.-K. (2020). Investigating consumers’ online social shopping intention: An information processing perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102189
   Google Scholar
• Geoffrey, V., Erjavec, G., & Charles, T. (2020). Processing visual metaphors in advertising: An exploratory study of cognitive abilities. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(8), 816–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2020.1817038
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J., Wang, X., & Wu, Y. (2020). Positive emotion bias: Role of emotional content from online customer reviews in purchase decisions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101891
   Google Scholar
• Hales, J., Kuang, X., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Who believes the hype? An experimental examination of how language affects investor judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(1), 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00394.x
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, R. A., & Scott, C. A. (1976). Comments on “attribution theory and advertiser credibility”. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(2), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150858
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, R. R., & Coney, K. A. (1982). The persuasive effects of source credibility in buy and lease situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(2), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151625
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. J., Tebbe, M. R., Leka, G. E., Garcia, R. C., & Erramouspe, R. (1999). Monolingual and bilingual memory for English and Spanish metaphors and similes. Metaphor & Symbol, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1401_1
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Helen, S. D., Ke, X., He, W., Chu, S. K. W., & Wagner, C. (2019). Achieving mobile social media popularity to enhance customer acquisition: Cases from P2P lending firms. Internet Research, 29(6), 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2018-0014
   Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, K. C., Finkel, E. J., Allan, D., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2012). On the dangers of pulling a fast one: Advertisement disclaimer speed, brand trust, and purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1086/660854
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., Swaminathan, V., & Brooks, G. (2019). Driving brand engagement through online social influencers: An empirical investigation of sponsored blogging campaigns. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919854374
   Google Scholar
• Insko, C. A., Kirchner, J. L., Pinter, B., Efaw, J., & Wildschut, T. (2005). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a function of trust and categorization: The paradox of expected cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.365
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, M. S., & Grayson, K. (2017). Beyond skepticism: Can accessing persuasion knowledge bolster credibility? Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 895–912. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw063
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J. W., & Namkung, Y. (2019). The information quality and source credibility matter in customers’ evaluation toward food O2O commerce. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.10.011
   Google Scholar
• Kiat, J. E., & Belli, R. F. (2018). The role of individual differences in visual/verbal information processing preferences in visual/verbal source monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(7), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2018.1509865
   Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A. (1990). The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1086/208546
   Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.2.66.18000
   Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., & Wright, P. (1989). Money talks: Perceived advertising expense and expected product quality. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1086/209220
   Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., & Zhu, R. (Juliet) (2007). Vigilant against manipulation: The effect of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.4.688
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.71
   Google Scholar
• Kronrod, A., & Danziger, S. (2013). “Wii will rock you!” the use and effect of figurative language in consumer reviews of hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 726–739. https://doi.org/10.1086/671998
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, C. M. C., Dai, X., & Wyer Jr, R. S. (2017). Contextual influences on message persuasion: The effect of empty space. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx051
   Google Scholar
• Laczniak, R. N., Kempf, D. S., & Muehling, D. D. (1999). Advertising message involvement: The role of enduring and situational factors. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.1999.10505088
   Google Scholar
• Lount, R. B. (2010). The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017344
   Google Scholar
• Madrigal, R., & King, J. (2017). Creative analogy as a means of articulating incongruent sponsorships. Journal of Advertising, 46(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1396513
   Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Main, K. J., Dahl, D. W., & Darke, P. R. (2007). Deliberative and automatic bases of suspicion: Empirical evidence of the sinister attribution error. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_9
   Google Scholar
• Mcguire, W. J. (2000). Standing on the shoulders of ancients: Consumer research, persuasion, and figurative language. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1086/314312
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., & Glen, M. D. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1086/209459
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/209549
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (2003). Visual and verbal rhetorical figures under directed processing versus incidental exposure to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 579–587. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.342340
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2005). Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639188
   Google Scholar
• Modig, E., Dahlén, M., & Colliander, J. (2014). Consumer-perceived signals of “creative” versus “efficient” advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-33-1-137-154
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. L., Douglas, H., & Kanchana, T. (1986). Time compression, response opportunity, and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/209049
   Google Scholar
• Morales, A. C. (2005). Giving firms an “E” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1086/426615
   Google Scholar
• Mothersbaugh, D. L., Huhmann, B. A., & Franke, G. R. (2002). Combinatory and separative effects of rhetorical figures on consumers’ effort and focus in ad processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1086/338211
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729–754. https://doi.org/10.1086/260231
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, D. L. F. (1976). Teaching English through the language of advertising. English Journal, 65(2), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/814808
   Google Scholar
• Packard, G., & Berger, J. (2017). How language shapes word of mouth's impact. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0248
   Google Scholar
• Packard, G., Gershoff, A. D., & Wooten, D. B. (2016). When boastful word of mouth helps versus hurts social perceptions and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw009
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2009). Impact of advertising metaphor on consumer belief: Delineating the contribution of comparison versus deviation factors. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367380104
   Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Google Scholar
• Praxmarer, S. (2011). Message strength and persuasion when consumers imagine product usage. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(4), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.331
   Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Source attributions and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295216010
   Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2003). The influence of spokesperson trustworthiness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_08
   Google Scholar
• Richard, V. (2000). How advertising works: A planning model. Putting it all together. Advertising & Society Review, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1353/asr.2000.0015
   Google Scholar
• Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, D. E., & Bailey, S. (2000). Customer/brand loyalty in an interactive marketplace. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(3), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-40-3-41-52
   Google Scholar
• Scott, L. M. (1994). The bridge from text to mind: Adapting reader-response theory to consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1086/209411
   Google Scholar
• Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x
   Google Scholar
• Stern, B. B. (1988). How does an ad mean? Language in services advertising. Journal of Advertising, 17(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1988.10673108
   Google Scholar
• Suher, J., & Hoyer, W. D. (2020). The moderating effect of buying impulsivity on the dynamics of unplanned purchasing motivations. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(3), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720912284
   Google Scholar
• Tülin, E., & Joffre, S. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/383434
   Google Scholar
• van Ewijk, B. J., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Gijsbrechts, E. (2020). The rise of online grocery shopping in China: Which brands will benefit? Journal of International Marketing, 28(2), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X20914265
   Google Scholar
• Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238
   Google Scholar
• West, D., Koslow, S., & Kilgour, M. (2019). Future directions for advertising creativity research. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1585307
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894421
   Google Scholar
• Wu, P. C. S., & Wang, Y. C. (2011). The influences of electronic word-of-mouth message appeal and message source credibility on brand attitude. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Logs, 23(4), 448–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851111165020
   Google Scholar
• Wyckham, R. G. (1984). The language of advertising—copy writers versus pop Grammarians. International Journal of Advertising, 3(November), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.1984.11105029
   Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., & Gruenfeld, D.H. (1995). Information processing in Interpersonal communication. In D. E. Hewes (Ed.), The cognitive Bases of Interpersonal communication (pp. 7–47). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, K. Z. K., Zhao, S. J., Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2014). Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers’ decision-making: A heuristic-systematic model. Decision Support Systems, 67, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.08.005
   Google Scholar