Jurors’ emotional state, attentional focus, and judicial judgment in a criminal court

References

• Bandes, S. A. (2009). Victims, closure, and the sociology of emotion. Law & Contemporary Problems, 72, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bandes, S. A., & Salerno, J. M. (2014). Emotion, proof and prejudice: The cognitive science of gruesome photos and victim impact statements. Arizona State Law Journal, 46, 1003.
   Google Scholar
• Bless, H. (2000). The interplay of affect and cognition: The mediating role of general knowledge structures. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Studies in emotion and social interaction, second series. Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 201–222). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bless, H., Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., Golisano, V., Rabe, C., & Wölk, M. (1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.665
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240104
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Google Scholar
• Bush, L. K., Barr, C. L., McHugo, G. J., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1989). The effects of facial control and facial mimicry on subjective reactions to comedy routines. Motivation and Emotion, 13(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995543
   Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes; applications (pp. 323–417). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dalle, N., & Niedenthal, P. (2003). La réorganisation de l’espace conceptuel au cours des états émotionnels. L’Année Psychologique, 103(4), 585–616. https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2003.29653
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(3), 622–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, R., & Esnard, C. (2019). Confirmatory information processing in legal decision: Effect of intimate conviction. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(3), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-9316-2
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., & Dougherty, A. (2016). Appraisals and reappraisals in the courtroom. Emotion Review, 8(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915601227
   Google Scholar
• Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(6), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7
   Google Scholar
• Esnard, C., & Dumas, R. (2019a). Jurors’ judgment under intimate conviction: The influence of magistrate’s opinion on confirmatory information processing. Cogent Psychology: Social Psychology, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1600633
   Google Scholar
• Esnard, C., & Dumas, R. (2019b). L’intime conviction: entre cadres légaux, représentations et pratiques chez les magistrats et jurés en cour d’assises. Bulletin de Psychologie, 72(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.559.0053
   Google Scholar
• Esnard, C., Dumas, R., & Bordel, S. (2013). Effects of the “intimate conviction” instruction on the processing of judicial information. European Review of Applied Psychology, 63(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Estrada-Reynolds, V., Schweitzer, K. A., & Nuñez, N. (2016). Emotions in the courtroom: How sadness, fear, anger, and disgust affect juror’s decisions. Wyo. L. Rev., 16, 343.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson, N. (2010). Emotional influences on judgments of legal blame: How they happen, whether they should, and what to do about it. In B. Bornstein & R. Wiener (Eds.), Emotion and the law: Psychological perspectives (pp. 45–96). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson, N. (2016). Jurors’ emotions and judgments of legal responsibility and blame: What does the experimental research tell us? Emotion Review, 8(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915601223
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson, N., & Park, J. (2006). Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: A research review. Law and Human Behavior, 30(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9026-z
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., & Bless, H. (2000). The formation of beliefs at the interface of affective and cognitive processes. In N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, & S. Bem (Eds.), Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts (pp. 144–170). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (2010). Affect and global versus local processing: The processing benefits of negative affect for memory, judgments, and behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 21(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.499298
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, K. (2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition and Emotion, 18(3), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000068
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00406
   Google Scholar
• Gissinger-Bosse, C. (2018). L’importance du fragile et du flou dans l’intime conviction en cour d’assises – Prendre le risque de faire un choix. Rencontres, 325 (5), 291–309.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, E., Chopra, S. R., Kovera, M. B., Penrod, S. D., Rose, V. G., Schuller, R., & Studebaker, C. A. (2002). Jurors and juries: A review of the field. In J. R. P. Ogloff (Ed.), Taking psychology and law into the twenty-first century (pp. 225–284). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., Schmid, P., & Krummenacher, J. (2013). Happy with a difference, unhappy with an identity: Observers’ mood determines processing depth in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0385-x
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., Bensman, L., Thornton, P. D., & Rapson, R. L. (2014). New perspectives on emotional contagion: A review of classic and recent research on facial mimicry and contagion. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 8(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.162
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., Falk, R., Minut, S., Dyer, F. C., & Mahadevan, S. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition by humans and machines. In T. F. Shipley & P. J. Kellman (Eds.), Advances in psychology, 130. From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp. 463–481). Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Weeks Jr., P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.210
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2011). Rapid communication: The own-age face recognition bias in children and adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.537926
   Google Scholar
• Huntsinger, J. R. (2012). Does positive affect broaden and negative affect narrow attentional scope? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027709
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1206–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1206
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., & Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition, 2(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1983.2.1.18
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E., Dougherty, F. E., Bloxom, B. M., & Kotsch, W. E. (1974). The differential emotions scale: A method of measuring the subjective experience of discrete emotions [Unpublished manuscript]. Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Ekman, P., Gonzaga, G. C., Beer, J., Scherer, K. R., Johnstone, T., & Juslin, P. (2003). Part IV: Expression of emotion. In: RH Davidson, H. Goldsmith, KR Scherer (eds). Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 411–559), Oxford University Press London.
   Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 740–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.740
   Google Scholar
• Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2000). Affect and stereotypic thinking: A test of the mood-and-general-knowledge model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1587–1597. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002612012
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.515
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., B. M., Hood, A. B., Milne, A. C., Rowe, & M. F., Mason. (2020). Are you looking at me? Eye gaze and person perception. Psychological Science, 13(5), 460–464.
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., & Shepherd, J. W. (1989). Do criminal stereotypes mediate juridic judgements? British Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00860.x
   Google Scholar
• Maroney, T. A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). The ideal of the dispassionate judge: An emotion regulation perspective. Emotion Review, 6(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913491989
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.102
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, S., & Buttle, H. (2015). The effect of observers’ mood on the local processing of emotional faces: Evidence from short-lived and prolonged mood States. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 11(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0167-5
   Google Scholar
• Myers, B., Nuñez, N., Wilkowski, B., Kehn, A., & Dunn, K. (2018). The heterogeneity of victim impact statements: A content analysis of capital trial sentencing penalty phase transcripts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(4), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000185
   Google Scholar
• Myers, B., Weidemann, E., & Pearce, G. (2006). Psychology weighs in on the debate surrounding victim impact statements and capital sentencing: Are emotional jurors really irrational? Federal Sentencing Reporter, 19(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2006.19.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Niedenthal, P. M., Brauer, M., Halberstadt, J. B., & Innes-Ker, Å. H. (2001). When did her smile drop? Facial mimicry and the influences of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression. Cognition & Emotion, 15(6), 853–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000194
   Google Scholar
• Nietzel, M. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Kern, M. J. (1999). Juries. In: Roesch R, Hart S. D., Ogloff J. R. P. (eds). Psychology and law. Perspectives in Law & Psychology (vol 10, pp. 23–52). Springer, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Nunez, N., Estrada-Reynolds, V., Schweitzer, K., & Myers, B. (2016). The impact of emotions on juror judgments and decision-making. In B. Bornstein & M. Miller (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 2, pp. 55–93). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez, N., Myers, B., Wilkowski, B. M., & Schweitzer, K. (2017). The impact of angry versus sad victim impact statements on mock jurors’ sentencing decisions in a capital trial. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(6), 862–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816689809
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez, N., Schweitzer, K., Chai, C. A., & Myers, B. (2015). Negative emotions felt during trial: The effect of fear, anger, and sadness on juror decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3094
   Google Scholar
• Ortony, A., Clore, G., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Bridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1005–1023. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1005
   Google Scholar
• Rainis, N., Alain, M., & Denève, C. (2004). Variables légales, variables extra-légales et décisions desjurés d’assises: Statut et fonctions des différentes expertises psycho-juridiques. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57(4), 351–362.
   Google Scholar
• Rokke, P. D., & Lystad, C. M. (2015). Mood-specific effects in the allocation of attention across time. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.893865
   Google Scholar
• Salerno, J. M., & Peter-Hagene, L. C. (2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2069–2078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486988
   Google Scholar
• Sandys, M., & Dillehay, C. (1995). First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499324
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, A., Nils, F., Sanchez, X., & Philippot, P. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion researchers. Cognition and Emotion, 24(7), 1153–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903274322
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semmler, C., & Brewer, N. (2002). Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.502
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., Visser, P. S., Singh, R., Polifroni, M., Scott, A., Elson, S. B., & Mazzocco, P., Rescober, P. (2007). People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social-control goals on attributions of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.009
   Google Scholar
• Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
   Google Scholar
• Wegbreit, E., Franconeri, S., & Beeman, M. (2015). Anxious mood narrows attention in feature space. Cognition and Emotion, 29(4), 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.922933
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 5–15. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, R. L., D. A., Krauss, & J. D., Lieberman. (2011). Mock jury research: Where do we go from here?. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 29(3), 467–479.
   Google Scholar