References
- Ahn, W., & Bailenson, J. (1996). Causal attribution as a search for underlying mechanism: An explanation of the conjunction fallacy and the discounting principle. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 82–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0013
- Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54(3), 299–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00640-7
- Bloom, P. (2006). My brain made me do it. Journal of Culture and Cognition, 6(1–2), 209–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156853706776931303
- Cartwright, N. (2004). Causation: One word, many things. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 805–820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/426771
- Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104(2), 367–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.367
- Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 545–567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.545
- Dale, P. S., Loftus, E. F., & Rathbun, L. (1978). The influence of the form of the question on the eyewitness testimony of preschool children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7(4), 269–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068110
- Ducasse, C. J. (1969). Causation and types of necessity. Dover.
- Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Harper, C. (2001). Necessity, possibility and belief: A study of syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 935–958. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/713755983
- Fine, K. (2002). The Varieties of necessity. In T. Gendler, & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Conceivability and possibility (pp. 253–282). Oxford University Press. Press, pp. 235–260.
- Frosch, C. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2011). Is everyday causation deterministic or probabilistic? Acta Psychologica, 137, 280–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.015
- Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naïve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 287–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00128-1
- Glennan, S. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, 3(S3), S342–S353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/341857
- Goldvarg, E., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Naive causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 565–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00046-5
- Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51(4), 334–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.004
- Hall, N. (2004). Two concepts of causation. In L. A. Paul, E. J. Hall, & J. Collins (Eds.), Causation and counterfactuals (pp. 225–276). MIT Press.
- Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
- Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific explanation. The Free Press.
- Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Khemlani, S. (2017). Mental models and causation. In M. Waldmann (Ed.), Oxford handbook of causal reasoning (pp. 1–42). Elsevier, Inc.: Academic Press.
- Johnson, S. G. B., & Ahn, W. (2017). Causal mechanisms. In M. Waldmann (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning (pp. 127–146). Oxford University Press.
- Johnson, S. G. B., & Keil, F. C. (2017). Statistical and mechanistic information in evaluating causal claims. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. J. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science society (pp. 618–623). Cognitive Science Society.
- Johnson, S. G. B., Valenti, J. J., & Keil, F. C. (2017). Opponent uses of simplicity and complexity in causal explanation. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 606–611). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Johnson, S. G. B., Valenti, J. J., & Keil, F. C. (2019). Simplicity and complexity preferences in causal explanation: An opponent heuristic account. Cognitive Psychology, 113, 101222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.05.004
- Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld, & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234–254). Cambridge University Press.
- Khemlani, S. S., Barbey, A. K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2014). Causal reasoning with mental models. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 849. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00849
- Kim, J. (2005). Laws, causation, and explanation in the special sciences. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 27(3/4), 325–338. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23333894
- Kitcher, P. (1985). Two approaches to explanation. Journal of Philosophy, 82(11), 632–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2026419
- Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In P. Kitcher, & W. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific Explanation, volume 13 of Minnesota studies in the Philosophy of science (pp. 410–505). University of Minnesota Press.
- Kment, B. (2017). Varieties of modality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 edition).
- Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press.
- Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
- Loftus, E. G., & Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336715
- Lombrozo, T. (2010). Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions. Cognitive Psychology, 61(4), 303–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.002
- Lu, H., Yuille, A. L., Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2008). Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. Psychological Review, 115(4), 955–984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013256
- Luhmann, C. C., & Ahn, W. (2005). The meaning and computation of causal power: Comment on Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004). Psychological Review, 112(3), 685–692. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.685
- Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Clarendon Press.
- Menzies, P. (1999). Intrinsic versus extrinsic conceptions of causation. In H. Sankey (Ed.), Causation and laws of nature (pp. 313–329). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Novick, L. R., & Cheng, P. W. (2004). Assessing interactive causal influence. Psychological Review, 111(2), 455–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.455
- Psillos, S. (2009). Causal pluralism. In R. Vanderbeeken, & B. D’Hooghe (Eds.), Worldviews, science and Us (pp. 131–151). World Scientific Publishers.
- Rose, D., Sievers, E., & Nichols, S. (forthcoming). Cause and burn. Cognition. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2020.104517
- Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press.
- Strickland, B., Silver, I., & Keil, F. C. (2017). The texture of causal construals: Domain specific biases shape causal inferences from discourse. Memory & Cognition, 45(3), 442–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0668-x
- Vaidya, A. (2007). The epistemology of modality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato. stanford.edu/entries/modality-epistemology.
- Waldmann, M. R., & Mayrhofer, R. (2016). Hybrid causal representations. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65) (pp. 85–127). Academic Press.
- Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 82–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.82
- Wolff, P. (2014). Causal pluralism and force dynamics. In B. Copley, F. Martin, & N. Duffield (Eds.), Forces in grammatical structures: Causation between linguistics and philosophy (pp. 100–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yeung, S., & Griffiths, T. L. (2015). Identifying expectations about the strength of causal relationships. Cognitive Psychology, 76, 1–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.11.001