References
- Alexander, P. A., Dumas, D., Grossnickle, E. M., List, A., & Firetto, C. (2015). Measuring relational reasoning. Journal of Experimental Education, 84(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.963216
- Alexander, P. A., Singer, L. M., Jablansky, S., & Hattan, C. (2016). Relational reasoning in word and in figure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1140–1152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000110
- Alexander, P. A., & The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722511
- Altshuller, G. (1996). And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Technical Innovation Center, Inc.
- Augustinova, M. (2008). Falsification cueing in collective reasoning: Example of Wason selection task. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 770–785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.532
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2011). Investigating and theorizing discourse during analogy writing in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 771–792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20428
- Beziau, J. Y., & Basti, G. (2016). The square of opposition: a cornerstore of thought. Birkhäuse.
- Beziau, J. Y., & Jacquette, D. (2012). Around and beyond the square of opposition. Birkhäuse.
- Beziau, J. Y., & Payette, G. (2012). The square of opposition: A general framework for cognition. Peter Lang.
- Bianchi, I., Bertamini, M., Burro, R., & Savardi, U. (2017). Opposition and identicalness: Two basic components of adults’ perception and mental representation of symmetry. Symmetry, 9(8), 128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/sym90801282-s2.0-85027360371
- Bianchi, I., Branchini, E., Burro, R., Capitani, E., & Savardi, U. (2020). Overtly prompting people to “think in opposites” supports insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 31–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1553738
- Bianchi, I., Branchini, E., Torquati, S., Fermani, A., Capitani, E., Barnaba, V., Savardi, U., & Burro, R. (2021). Non experts’ understanding of terms frequently used by experts to describe the sensory properties of wine: An investigation based on opposites. Food Quality and Preference, 92, 104215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104215
- Bianchi, I., Burro, R., Pezzola, R., & Savardi, U. (2017). Matching visual and acoustic mirror forms. Symmetry, 9(3), 39–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9030039
- Bianchi, I., Burro, R., Torquati, S., & Savardi, U. (2013). The middle of the road. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.005
- Bianchi, I., Paradis, C., Burro, R., van de Weijer, J., Nyström, M., & Savardi, U. (2017). Identification of opposites and intermediates by eye and by hand. Acta Psychologica, 180, 175–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.011
- Bianchi, I., & Savardi, U. (2008). The perception and cognition of contraries. Aracne ed.
- Bianchi, I., & Savardi, U. (2018). Spatial contraries and mirrors. In T. Hubbard (Ed.), Spatial biases in perception and cognition (pp. 209–221). Cambridge University Press.
- Bianchi, I., Savardi, U., & Burro, R. (2011). Perceptual ratings of opposite spatial properties: Do they lie on the same dimension? Acta Psychologica, 138(3), 405–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.003
- Bianchi, I., Savardi, U., Burro, R., & Martelli, M. F. (2014). Doing the opposite to what another person is doing. Acta Psychologica, 151, 117–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.003
- Bianchi, I., Savardi, U., & Kubovy, M. (2011). Dimensions and their Poles: A metric and topological theory of opposites. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(8), 1232–1265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.520943
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- Bozzi, P. (2019). Phenomenological analysis of pendular harmonic motion and the conditions for “natural” motion along inclined planes. In I. Bianchi, & R. Davis (Eds.), Paolo Bozzi’s experimental phenomenology (pp. 213–245). Routledge.
- Branchini, E., Bianchi, I., Burro, R., Capitani, E., & Savardi, U. (2016). Can contraries prompt intuition in insight problem solving? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1962. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01962
- Branchini, E., Burro, R., Bianchi, I., & Savardi, U. (2015). Contraries as an effective strategy in geometrical problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(4), 397–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014
- Branchini, E., Capitani, E., Burro, R., Savardi, U., & Bianchi, I. (2021). Opposites in reasoning processes: Do we use them more than we think, but less than we could? Frontiers in Psychology - Cognitive Science, 12, 3696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715696
- Burro, R., Savardi, U., Annunziata, M. A., De Paoli, P., & Bianchi, I. (2018). The effects of presenting oncologic information in terms of opposites in a medical context. Patient Preference and Adherence, 12, 443–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S147091;2-s2.0-85044569264
- Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. MIT Press.
- Byrne, R. M. J. (2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249
- Byrne, R. M. J. (2018). Counterfactual reasoning and imagination. In L. J. Ball, & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 71–87). Routledge.
- Calmus, A., & Caillies, S. (2014). Verbal irony processing: How do contrast and humour. Correlate? International Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12003
- Canestrari, C., & Bianchi, I. (2018). Perceptual opposites and contrast modulation in irony. Review of Cognitive Linguistics (Special Issue: Issues in Humour Cognition), 16(1), 48–71. 2-s2.0-85048004312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00003.can
- Capitani, E., Branchini, E., Burro, R., Savardi, U., & Bianchi, I. (2020). The opposite of a transformation process. An exploration based on diagrams. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(7), 698–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2020.18143072-s2.0-85090305131
- Casasola, M. (2008). The development of infants’ spatial categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00541.x
- Casasola, M., Cohen, L. B., & Chiarello, E. (2003). Six-month-old infants’ categorization of containment spatial relations. Child Development, 74(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00562
- Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for scienceinstruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
- Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1–33). Erlbaum.
- Colston, H. L. (2002). Contrast and assimilation in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(2), 111–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80008-X
- Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., Baker, L. M., Jablansky, S., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Relational reasoning in medical education: Patterns in discourse and diagnosis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1021–1035. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a003677
- Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., & Grossnickle, E. M. (2013). Relational reasoning and its manifestations in the educational context: A systematic review of theliterature. Educational Psychology Review, 25(3), 391–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9224-4
- Dumas, D., & Schmidt, L. (2015). Relational reasoning as predictor for engineering ideation success using TRIZ. Journal of Engineering Design, 26(1–3), 74–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1020287
- Dumas, D., Schmidt, L. C., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 50–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.002
- Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013a). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
- Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013b). Theory and metatheory in the study of dual processing: Reply to comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613483774
- Forabosco, G. (2008). ) Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5
- Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2018). Visualizing fit and lack of fit in complex regression models with predictor effect plots and partial residuals. Journal of Statistical Software, 87(9), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v087.i09
- Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2003). Facilitated rule discovery inWason’s 2–4–6 task: The role negative triples. In R. Alterman, & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 438–443). Cognitive Science Society.
- Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Dual-goal facilitation in Wason’s 2-4-6 task: What mediates successful rule discovery? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 873–885. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000051
- Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2009). Exploring the determinants of dual goal facilitation in a rule discovery task. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(3), 294–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903040666
- Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2012). Contrast class cues and performance facilitation in a hypothesis testing task: Evidence for an iterative counterfactual model. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 408–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0159-z
- Giaquinto, M. (2007). Visual thinking in mathematics. Oxford University Press.
- Halekoh, U., & Höjsgaard, S. (2014). A kenward-roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models – The R package pbkr test. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(9), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i09
- Hespos, S. J., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Conceptual precursors to language. Nature, 430(6998), 453–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02634
- Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234–260). Oxford University Press.
- Jones, S. (2002). Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. Routledge.
- Jones, S. (2007). “Opposites” in discourse: A comparison of antonym use across four domains. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1105–1119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.019
- Jones, S., Murphy, M. L., Paradis, C., & Willners, C. (2012). Antonyms in English: Construals, constructions and canonicity. Cambridge University Press.
- Kavakli, M., Scrivener, S. A. R., & Ball, L. J. (1998). Structure in idea sketching behaviour. Design Studies, 19(4), 485–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00012-X
- Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrøm, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. The MIT Press.
- Kostić, N. (2015). Antonymy in language use: From core members to ad hoc couplings. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 51(1), 133–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2015-0005
- Lehrer, A. (2009). Wine and conversation (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
- Length, R. (2019). emmeans. Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means: The R Package version 1.4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
- McCloskey, M. (1983). Naïve theories of motion. In D. Gentner, & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299–324). Erlbaum.
- McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naïve beliefs about the motion of objects. Science, 210(4474), 1139–1141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.210.4474.1139
- McCloskey, M., Washburn, A., & Felch, L. (1983). Intuitive physics: The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 636–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.636
- Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy, and other paradigms. Cambridge University Press.
- Murphy, M. L., & Jones, S. (2008). Antonyms in children’s and child-directed speech. First Language, 28(4), 403–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723708091047
- Paradis, C. (2015). Conceptual spaces at work in sensory cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In F. Zenker, & P. Gärdenfors (Eds.), Applications of conceptual spaces. Synthese library (studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science), volume 359 (pp. 33–55). Springer.
- Phillips, C. I., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). When Do children understand “opposite”? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(4), 1233–1244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0222
- Press, C., Ray, E., & Heyes, C. (2009). Imitation of lateralised body movements: Doing it the hard way. Laterality, 14(5), 515–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500802607990
- Proffitt, D. R., & Gilden, D. L. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 384–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.384
- Quinn, P. C., Cummins, M., Kase, J., Martin, E., & Weisman, S. (1996). Development of categorical representations for above and below spatial relations in 3- to 7-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 942–950. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.942
- R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
- Smith, L. B., Cooney, N. J., & McCord, C. (1986). What is ‘high’? The development of reference points for ‘high’ and ‘low’. Child Development, 57(3), 583–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1130338
- Tribushinina, E., van den Bergh, H., Kilani-Schoch, M., Aksu-Koç, A., Dabašinskienė, I., Hrzica, G., Korecky-Kröll, K., Noccetti, S., & Dressler, W. (2013). The role of explicit contrast in adjective acquisition: A cross-linguistic longitudinal study of adjective production in spontaneous child speech and parental input. First Language, 33(6), 594–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723713503146
- Truong, H., Burro, R., & Bianchi, I. (2021). The sensorial experience of wine for non-experts: How the terms frequently used in Italian guidebooks are understood by standard consumers in Vietnam. Journal of Sensory Studies, 36(4), e12656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12656
- Tseng, W. S. W., & Ball, L. J. (2011). How uncertainty helps sketch interpretation in a design task. In T. Taura & Y. Nagai (Eds.), Design creativity 2010 (pp. 257–264). London: Springer.
- Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Payton, T. (2008). Graphical representation fosters discovery in the 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 625–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701268039
- Vallee-Tourangeau, F., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2014). Diagrams, jars, and matchsticks. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.02val
- van der Helm, P. A. (2015). Symmetry perception. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), Oxford handbook of perceptual organization (pp. 108–128). Oxford University Press.
- World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
- Ye, Z. (2014). Opposites in language and thought: A Chinese perspective. In G. Rundblad, A. Tytus, O. Knapton, & C. Tang (Eds.), Selected papers from the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics conference (pp. 284–302). UK Cognitive Linguistics Association.