Identifying obstacles to transfer of critical thinking skills

References

• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2014). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084
   Google Scholar
• Aczel, B., Bago, B., Szollosi, A., Foldes, A., & Lukacs, B. (2015a). Is it time for studying real-life debiasing? Evaluation of the effectiveness of an analogical intervention technique. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01120
   Google Scholar
• Aczel, B., Bago, B., Szollosi, A., Foldes, A., & Lukacs, B. (2015b). Measuring individual differences in decision biases: Methodological considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01770
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barreiros, J., Figueiredo, T., & Godinho, M. (2007). The contextual interference effect in applied settings. European Physical Education Review, 13(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X07076876
   Google Scholar
• Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(1), 153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.1.153
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Zhang, D., Abrami, P. C., Sicoly, F., Borokhovski, E., & Surkes, M. A. (2008). Exploring the structure of the watson–glaser critical thinking appraisal: One scale or many subscales? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2007.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, K. N., Koenigseder, L. A., Ishee, J. H., & Williams, B. G. (2001). Psychometric properties of the California critical thinking tests. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 9(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.9.3.309
   Google Scholar
• Bray, C. W. (1928). Transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(6), 443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071273
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Black-Maier, A. C., Raley, N. D., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Retrieving and applying knowledge to different examples promotes transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(4), 433–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000142
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 290–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031026
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 279–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412452728
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. A., Linn, R. L., & Walster, G. W. (1970). Effect of reliability and validity on power of statistical tests. Sociological Methodology, 2, 130–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031026
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd. ed., reprint). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, S. M., & Hagman, J. D. (2014). Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.697878
   Google Scholar
• De Chantal, P. L., Newman, I. R., Thompson, V., & Markovits, H. (2019). Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus. Memory & Cognition, 48, 655–671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00998-2
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D C Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L., Baggetta, P., Doyle, S., & Loughlin, S. M. (2014). The role of initial learning, problem features, prior knowledge, and pattern recognition on transfer success. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.835299
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, D., & Bjork, R. A. (1994). Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17, 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 978–996. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.978
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196976
   Google Scholar
• Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of Educational assessment and instruction. The California Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-
   Google Scholar
• Flores, K. L., Matkin, G. S., Burbach, M. E., Quinn, C. E., & Harding, H. (2012). Deficient critical thinking skills among college graduates: Implications for leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(2), 212–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00672.x
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanism of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863
   Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
   Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Hug, K. (1992). Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change. Cognition, 43(2), 127–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90060-U
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. (2014). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought & knowledge. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., & Butler, H. A. (2019). Teaching critical thinking as if our future depends on it, because it does. In J. Dunlosky, & K. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 51–66). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heijltjes, A., Van Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving critical thinking: Effects of dispositions and instructions on economics students’ reasoning skills. Learning and Instruction, 29, 31–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Heijltjes, A., Van Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F. (2015). Unraveling the effects of critical thinking instructions, practice, and self-explanation on students’ reasoning performance. Instructional Science, 43(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3025
   Google Scholar
• Heijltjes, A., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving students’ critical thinking: Empirical support for explicit instructions combined with practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 518–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3025
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1989). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Cordray, D. S. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 88–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539325
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, E. M., Mainhard, T., Buisman, R. S. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Van Peppen, L. M., & Van Gog, T. (2019). Training higher education teachers’ critical thinking and attitudes towards teaching It. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 310–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, T., & Beaulac, G. (2014). Critical thinking education and debiasing. Informal Logic, 34(4), 341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v34i4.4203
   Google Scholar
• Ku, K. Y. L. (2009). Assessing students’ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports, 6(1), 40–41.
   Google Scholar
• LeBel, E. P., & Paunonen, S. V. (2011). Sexy but often unreliable: The impact of unreliability on the replicability of experimental findings with implicit measures. Personality and Social Psycholy Bulletin, 37(4), 570–583. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211400619
   Google Scholar
• Leppa, C. J. (1997). Standardized measures of critical thinking: Experience with the California critical thinking tests. Nurse Educator, 22(5), 29–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-199709000-00012
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next-generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12009
   Google Scholar
• Loo, R., & Thorpe, K. (1999). A psychometric investigation of scores on the Watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal new forms. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(6), 995–1003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921970305
   Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., & Nantel, G. (1989). The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions. Memory & Cognition, 17(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199552
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. C. Berlinert, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47–62). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A. (2007). Transfer: Rediscovering a central concept. In H. L. Roediger, Y. Dudai, & S. M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Science of memory: Concepts (pp. 267–270). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., & Fyfe, E. R. (2012). “Concreteness fading” promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 440–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Moxley, S. E. (1979). Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1979.10735173
   Google Scholar
• Newstead, S. E., Pollard, P., Evans, J. S. B. T., & Allen, J. L. (1992). The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 45(3), 257–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90019-E
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Transferable knowledge and skills for the 21st century. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postelwhite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of educational (Vol. 11, 2nd ed., pp. 6452–6457). Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. K. (1987). A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.124
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A., & Eitel, A. (2019). Self-explaining: Learning about principles and their application. In J. Dunlosky, & K. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 528–549). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3102_3
   Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. N. (2005). Learning to think: The challenges of teaching thinking. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 775–802). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, W. T., & Hopkins, K. D. (1988). Power estimates in the presence of a covariate and measurement error. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(3), 647–656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164488483008
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanism of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2402_1
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2016). The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3604_2
   Google Scholar
• Tiruneh, D. T., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2014). Effectiveness of critical thinking instruction in higher education: A systematic review of intervention studies. Higher Education Studies, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n1p1
   Google Scholar
• Tiruneh, D. T., Weldeslassie, A. G., Kassa, A., Tefera, Z., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain-specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 481–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9417-2
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   Google Scholar
• Van Eersel, G. G., Verkoeijen, P. P., Povilenaite, M., & Rikers, R. (2016). The testing effect and far transfer: The role of exposure to key information. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01977
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, T. V. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.41-48
   Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Jelsma, O., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training for reflective expertise: A four component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(2), 23–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0229704
   Google Scholar
• Van Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L, Heijltjes, A., Janssen, E., & van Gog, T. (2021b). Repeated Retrieval Practice to Foster Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.28881
   Google Scholar
• Van Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Janssen, E. M., Koopmans, D., & van Gog, T. (2018). Effects of self-explaining on learning and transfer of critical thinking skills. Frontiers in Education, 3, 275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00100
   Google Scholar
• Van Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Janssen, E. M., & van Gog, T. (2021a). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills: Is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial?Instructional Science, 78, 1102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09559-0
   Google Scholar
• Van Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Kolenbrander, S. V., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Janssen, E. M., & van Gog, T. (2021c). Learning to avoid biased reasoning: Effects of interleaved practice and worked examples. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(3), 304–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2021.1890092
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012842
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, M. C. (2010). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433554
   Google Scholar