References
- Albrengues, C., Lavigne, F., Aguilar, C., Castet, E., & Vitu, F. (2019). Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against word-based eye-movement control during reading. PLOS ONE, 14(7), 1–47. . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219666
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2019). Lme4: Linear mixed effects models using Eigen and S4. R package v. 1.1-21. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Becker, W., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19(9), 967–983. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(79)90222-0
- Bicknell, K., Levy, R., & Rayner, K. (2020). Ongoing cognitive processing influences precise eye-movement targets in reading. Psychological Science, 31(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620901766
- Briihl, D., & Inhoff, A. W. (1995). Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.55
- Brothers, T., Hoversten, L. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2017). Looking back on reading ahead: No evidence for lexical parafoveal-on-foveal effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 96, 9–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.001
- Choi, W., & Gordon, P. C. (2014). Word skipping during sentence reading: Effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0494-1
- Cutter, M. G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2017). Reading sentences of uniform word length: Evidence for the adaptation of the preferred saccade length during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(11), 1895–1911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000416
- Cutter, M. G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2018). Reading sentences of uniform word length–II: Very rapid adaptation of the preferred saccade length. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(4), 1435–1440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1473-2
- Drieghe, D. (2008). Foveal processing and word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 856–860. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.856
- Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777–813. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
- Eskenazi, M. A., & Folk, J. R. (2015). Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 537–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0682-6
- Faber, N. M., & Rajko, R. (2007). How to avoid over-fitting in multivariate calibration—The conventional validation approach and an alternative. Analytica Chimica Acta, 595(1–2), 98–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.05.030
- Fox, J., Friendly, G. G., Graves, S., Heiberger, R., Monette, G., Nilsson, H., … Suggests, M. A. S. S. (2007). The car package. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., Richlan, F., Schuster, S., & Hutzler, F. (2014). Parafoveal preprocessing in reading revisited: Evidence from a novel preview manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 588–595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034408
- Glaholt, M. G., Rayner, K., & Reingold, E. M. (2014). A rapid effect of stimulus quality on the durations of individual fixations during reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 377–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.891542
- Gordon, P. C., Plummer, P., & Choi, W. (2013). See before you jump: Full recognition of parafoveal words precedes skips during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 633–641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028881
- Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (2009). Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.002
- Hartigan, P. M. (1985). Computation of the dip statistic to test for unimodality. Applied Statistics, 34(3), 320–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2347485
- Hautala, J., Hyönä, J., & Aro, M. (2011). Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers’ eye movement patterns. Vision Research, 51(15), 1719–1727. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.015
- Hautala, J., & Loberg, O. (2015). Breaking down the word length effect on readers’ eye-movements. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(8), 993–1007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1049187
- Hermena, E. W., Liversedge, S. P., & Drieghe, D. (2017). The influence of a word’s number of letters, spatial extent, and initial bigram characteristics on eye movement control during reading: Evidence from Arabic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(3), 451–471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000319
- Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 166–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033670
- Huovilainen, T. M. (2018). Psycholinguistic descriptives. The Language Bank of Finland. http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:lb-2018081601
- Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2011). Optimal viewing position effects in reading Finnish. Vision Research, 51(11), 1279–1287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.004
- Hyönä, J., Yan, M., & Vainio, S. (2018). Morphological structure influences the initial landing position in words during reading Finnish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 122–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1267233
- Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 979–995. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.979
- Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (2014). Parafoveal preview benefits during silent and oral reading: Testing the parafoveal information extraction hypothesis. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 354–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.879630
- Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Eiter, B. M., & Juhasz, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(5), 803–827. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000639
- Jacobs, A. M. (1987). On localization and saccade programming. Vision Research, 27(11), 1953–1966. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(87)90060-5
- Khan, A., Loberg, O., & Hautala, J. (2017). On the eye movement control of changing reading direction for a single word: The case of reading numerals in Urdu. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(5), 1273–1283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9491-1
- Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2005). Fixation durations before word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 132–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196358
- Laurinavichyute, A. K., Sekerina, I. A., Alexeeva, S., Bagdasaryan, K., & Kliegl, R. (2019). Russian sentence corpus: Benchmark measures of eye movements in reading in Russian. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1051-6
- Lenth, R, Singmann, H, Love, J, Buerkner, P, & Herve, M. (2018). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Li, H. H., Barbot, A., & Carrasco, M. (2016). Saccade preparation reshapes sensory tuning. Current Biology, 26(12), 1564–1570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.028
- Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000248
- Liu, Y., Guo, S., Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D. (2018). Word predictability affects saccade length in Chinese reading: An evaluation of the dynamic-adjustment model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1891–1899. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1357-x
- Liu, Y., Huang, R., Gao, D., & Reichle, E. D. (2017). Further tests of a dynamic-adjustment account of saccade targeting during the reading of Chinese. Cognitive Science, 41, 1264–1287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12487
- Liu, Y., Huang, R., Li, Y., & Gao, D. (2017). The word frequency effect on saccade targeting during Chinese reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of saccade length. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(116), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00116
- Liu, Y., Yu, L., Fu, L., Li, W., Duan, Z., & Reichle, E. D. (2019). The effects of parafoveal word frequency and segmentation on saccade targeting during Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1367–1376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01577-x
- Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Li, X., Yan, G., Bai, X., & Hyönä, J. (2016). Universality in eye-movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition, 147, 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.013
- Ludden, T. M., Beal, S. L., & Sheiner, L. B. (1994). Comparison of the Akaike information criterion, the schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 22(5), 431–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353864
- Mächler, M. (2013). Package ‘diptest’. R package version 0.75–5. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2018). Visual letter similarity effects during sentence reading: Evidence from the boundary technique. Acta Psychologica, 190, 142–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.007
- McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye-movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28(10), 1107–1118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(88)90137-X
- McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye-movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208086
- McConkie, G. W., & Yang, S. N. (2003). How cognition affects eye-movements during reading. In J. Hyönä, H. Deubel, & R. Radach (Eds.), The mind’s eye (pp. 413–427). North-Holland.
- McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1984). Eye movement control during reading: The effect of word units. In W. Prinz, & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 63–74). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69382-3_5
- McDonald, S. A. (2006). Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal. Vision Research, 46(26), 4416–4424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.027
- McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2005). The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading. Vision Research, 45(6), 801–820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.002
- McGowan, V. A., & Reichle, E. D. (2018). The “risky” reading strategy revisited: New simulations using E-Z reader. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 179–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1307424
- McSorley, E., Gilchrist, I. D., & McCloy, R. (2019). The programming of sequences of saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 237(4), 1009–1018. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05481-7
- Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45(17), 2201–2217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.014
- Plummer, P., & Rayner, K. (2012). Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 950–963. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0286-z
- Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.001
- Radach, R., Inhoff, A., & Heller, D. (2004). Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 27–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000222
- Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90037-8
- Rayner, K., Raney, G. E., & Sereno, S. C. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of Two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(5), 1188–1200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1188
- Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N. (2010). Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 834–839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.834
- Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye-movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 514–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020990
- R Core Team and Contributors Worldwide. (2002). The R stats package. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. http://www.R-project.org.
- Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Blythe, H. I., Joseph, H. S., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2013). Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill. Developmental Review, 33(2), 110–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.03.001
- Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39(26), 4403–4411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00152-2
- Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Eye-movements in reading versus nonreading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity. Visual Cognition, 20(4-5), 360–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2012.667006
- Reichle, E. D., & Sheridan, H. (2015). E-Z reader: An overview of the model and two recent applications. In A. Pollatsek, & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 277–292). Oxford University Press.
- Reilly, R. G., & O’Regan, J. K. (1998). Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Research, 38(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(97)87710-3
- Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.006
- Reingold, E. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Psychological Science, 17(9), 742–746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01775.x
- Reingold, E. M., Sheridan, H., Meadmore, K. L., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(12), 2003–2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000291
- Rice, M. L., Leske, D. A., Smestad, C. E., & Holmes, J. M. (2008). Results of ocular dominance testing depend on assessment method. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 12(4), 365–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.01.017
- Risse, S., Hohenstein, S., Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2014). A theoretical analysis of the perceptual span based on SWIFT simulations of the n+ 2 boundary paradigm. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 283–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.881444
- Rolfs, M., & Carrasco, M. (2012). Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(40), 13744–13752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2676-12.2012
- Schilling, H. E., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201199
- Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
- Schotter, E. R., Leinenger, M., & von der Malsburg, T. (2018). When your mind skips what your eyes fixate: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1884–1890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1356-y
- Schotter, E. R., von der Malsburg, T., & Leinenger, M. (2019). Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(4), 677–688. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000617
- Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., Højsgaard, S., Fox, J., … Christensen, R. H. B. (2018). Analysis of factorial experiments. R package. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex.
- Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018). OB1-reader: a model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125(6), 969–984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000119
- The Finnish N-gram Corpus, version 1 (FNC1). 2014. Distributed by the University of Helsinki on behalf of the FIN-CLARIN Consortium. http://www.helsinki.fi/finclarin/fnc1.
- Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2014). Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(4), 703–727. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.826258
- Veldre, A., Reichle, E. D., Wong, R., & Andrews, S. (2020). The effect of contextual plausibility on word skipping during reading. Cognition, 197, 104184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104184
- Vitu, F. (2003). The basic assumptions of E-Z Reader are not well-founded. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 506–507. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0351010X
- Warrington, K. L., McGowan, V. A., Paterson, K. B., & White, S. J. (2018). Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(11), 1714–1729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000543
- Wei, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2013). Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading. Vision Research, 80, 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.11.015
- White, S. J. (2007). Foveal load and parafoveal processing: The case of word skipping. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye-movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 409–424). Elsevier.
- White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Foveal processing difficulty does not modulate non-foveal orthographic influences on fixation positions. Vision Research, 46(3), 426–437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.006
- White, S. J., & Staub, A. (2012). The distribution of fixation durations during reading: Effects of stimulus quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 603–617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025338
- Wotschack, C., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 548–562. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.625094
- Yang, S. N., & Vitu, F. (2007). Dynamic coding of saccade length in reading. In R. P. G. Van Gompel, M. F. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements (pp. 293–317). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50015-X.
- Yao-N’Dré, M., Castet, E., & Vitu, F. (2014). Inter-word eye behaviour during reading is not invariant to character size: Evidence against systematic saccadic range error in reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3-4), 415–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.886652
- Yu, L., Liu, Y., & Reichle, E. D. (2020). A corpus-based vs. Experimental examination of word- and character-frequency effects in Chinese reading: Theoretical implications for models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication.