References
- Alexander, G. M., & Evardone, M. (2008). Blocks and bodies: Sex differences in a novel version of the Mental Rotations test. Hormones and Behavior, 53(1), 177–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.014
- Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(5-6), 327–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287729
- Bleidorn, W., Arslan, R. C., Denissen, J. J., Rentfrow, P. J., Gebauer, J. E., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Age and gender differences in self-esteem—A cross-cultural window. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 396–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000078
- Cooke-Simpson, A., & Voyer, D. (2007). Confidence and gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 181–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.009
- Courvoisier, D. S., Renaud, O., Geiser, C., Paschke, K., Gaudy, K., & Jordan, K. (2013). Sex hormones and mental rotation: An intensive longitudinal investigation. Hormones and Behavior, 63(2), 345–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.12.007
- Doyle, R. A., & Voyer, D. (2016). Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 103–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.018
- Doyle, R. A., & Voyer, D. (2018). Photographs of real human figures: Item types and persistent sex differences in mental rotation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(11), 2411–2420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817742079
- Estes, Z., & Felker, S. (2012). Confidence mediates the sex difference in mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(3), 557–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9875-5
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Halpern, D. F., Straight, C. A., & Stephenson, C. L. (2011). Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size. Sex Roles, 64(5), 336–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9891-2
- Hogan, H. W. (1978). IQself-estimates of males and females. The Journal of Social Psychology, 106(1), 137–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1978.9924160
- Hyde, J. S. (2016). Sex and cognition: Gender and cognitive functions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 38, 53–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.02.007
- Jäncke, L. (2018). Sex/gender differences in cognition, neurophysiology, and neuroanatomy. F1000Research, 7, 805. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13917.1
- Jansen, P., & Lehmann, J. (2013). Mental rotation performance in soccer players and gymnasts in an object-based mental rotation task. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0135-8
- Jansen, P., & Pietsch, S. (2020). Sports and mathematical abilities in primary school-aged children: How important are spatial abilities? An explorative study. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01190-5
- Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007). Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 64(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.03.002
- Kalichman, S. C. (1988). Individual differences in water-level task performance: A component-skills analysis. Developmental Review, 8(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(88)90007-X
- Leiner, D. J. (2019). SoSci survey (Version 3.1.06) [Computer software]. https://www.soscisurvey.de.
- Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 1479–1498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467.
- Mengelkamp, C., & Jager, R. S. (2007). Self-estimates of attention performance. Psychology Science, 49(3), 223–237.
- Moè, A., Jansen, P., & Pietsch, S. (2018). Childhood preference for spatial toys. Gender differences and relationships with mental rotation in STEM and non-STEM students. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 108–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.003
- Moè, A., Meneghetti, C., & Cadinu, M. (2009). Women and mental rotation: Incremental theory and spatial strategy use enhance performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 187–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.030
- Quaiser-Pohl, C., Lehmann, W., & Eid, M. (2004). The relationship between spatial abilities and representations of large-scale space in children—a structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00071-0
- Rahe, M., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2020). Cubes or pellets in mental-rotation tests: Effects on gender differences and on the performance in a subsequent math test. Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010012
- Rahe, M., Ruthsatz, V., Jansen, P., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2018). Influence of sex-stereotyped stimuli on the mental-rotation performance of elderly persons. Experimental Aging Research, 44(4), 284–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2018.1475156
- Rahe, M., Ruthsatz, V., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2020). Influence of the stimulus material on gender differences in a mental-rotation test. Psychological Research, 85, 2892–2899. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01450-w
- Ruthsatz, V., Neuburger, S., Jansen, P., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2014, September). Pellet figures, the feminine answer to cube figures? Influence of stimulus features and rotational axis on the mental-rotation performance of fourth-grade boys and girls. In International conference on spatial cognition (pp. 370–382). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_26.
- Ruthsatz, V., Neuburger, S., Jansen, P., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2015). Cars or dolls? Influence of the stereotyped nature of the items on children’s mental-rotation performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 75–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.016
- Ruthsatz, V., Neuburger, S., Rahe, M., Jansen, P., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2017). The gender effect in 3D-mental-rotation performance with familiar and gender-stereotyped objects – a study with elementary school children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(6), 717–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1312689
- Ruthsatz, V., Rahe, M., Schürmann, L., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2019). Girls’ stuff, boys’ stuff and mental rotation: Fourth graders rotate faster with gender-congruent stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1567518
- Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440
- Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701
- Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1978). Sex differences in the correlations among field dependence, spatial ability, sex role orientation, and performance on Piaget’s water-level task. Developmental Psychology, 14(6), 689–690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.14.6.689
- Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
- Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
- Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
- Vasta, R., Knott, J. A., & Gaze, C. E. (1996). Can spatial training erase the gender differences on the water-level task? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(4), 549–567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00321.x
- Vasta, R., & Liben, L. S. (1996). The water-level task. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(6), 171–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512379
- Voyer, D. (2011). Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0042-0
- Voyer, D., & Jansen, P. (2017). Motor expertise and performance in spatial tasks: A meta-analysis. Human Movement Science, 54, 110–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.004
- Voyer, D., Nolan, C., & Voyer, S. (2000). The relation between experience and spatial performance in men and women. Sex Roles, 43(11), 891–915. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011041006679
- Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
- Weckbacher, L. M., & Okamoto, Y. (2014). Mental rotation ability in relation to self-perceptions of high school geometry. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 58–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.007