Navon-induced processing biases fail to affect the recognition of whole faces and isolated facial features

References

• Brand, A. (2004). A Web Experiment Based Enquiry into the Verbal Overshadowing Effect.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. (2012). MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0
   Google Scholar
• DeGutis, J., Wilmer, J., Mercado, R. J., & Cohan, S. (2013). Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability. Cognition, 126(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Estudillo, A. J. (2012). Facial memory: The role of the Pre-existing knowledge in face processing and recognition. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i2.455
   Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105(3), 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482
   Google Scholar
• Filoteo, V. J., Friedrich, F. J., & Stricker, J. L. (2001). Shifting attention to different levels within global-local stimuli: A study of normal participants and a patient with temporal-parietal lobe damage. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(3), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290125839
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., Flevaris, A. V, Robertson, L. C., & Bentin, S. (2011). Priming global and local processing of composite faces: Revisiting the processing-bias effect on face perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(5), 1477–1486. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0109-7
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, I. (2018). Domain-Specific and domain-general individual differences in visual object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417737151
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82(1), https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076157
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2007). Temporal limitation of Navon effect on face recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(2), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.104.2.501-509
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2009). A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1427–1442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015788
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S., Thomas, A. K., & Sommers, S. R. (2019). “They all still look the same to me”: Navon processing and the cross-race effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(8), 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1679156
   Google Scholar
• Hubner, R. (2000). Attention shifting between global and local target levels: The persistence of level-repetition effects. Visual Cognition, 7(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394612
   Google Scholar
• Kar Wye Lee, J., Janssen, S., & Estudillo, A. J. (2022). A featural account for own-face processing? Looking for support from face inversion, composite face, and part-whole tasks. i-Perception, 13, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695221111409
   Google Scholar
• Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.24
   Google Scholar
• Large, M.-E. E., & McMullen, P. A. (2006). Hierarchical attention in discriminating objects at different levels of specificity. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(5), 845–860. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193706
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. (2007). Local and global processing biases fail to influence face, object, and word recognition. Visual Cognition, 15(6), 710–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280601112519
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2004). Part-to-whole effects and configural processing in faces. Psychology Science, 46(4), 531–543.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2005). When context hinders! learn–test compatibility in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000936
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. B., Mills, C., Hills, P. J., & Weston, N. (2009). Navon letters affect face learning and face retrieval. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.258
   Google Scholar
• Luna, D. (1993). Effects of exposure duration and eccentricity of global and local information on processing dominance. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449308520115
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know You? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13(2), 194–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00436
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, D., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4
   Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (2003). What does a compound letter tell the psychologist’s mind? Acta Psychologica, 114(3), 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Paquet, L., & Merikle, P. M. (1984). Global precedence: The effect of exposure duration. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 38(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080783
   Google Scholar
• Perfect, T. J. (2003). Local processing bias impairs lineup performance. Psychological Reports, 93(2), 393–394. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.93.2.393
   Google Scholar
• Rezlescu, C., Susilo, T., Wilmer, J. B., & Caramazza, A. (2017). The inversion, part-whole, and composite effects reflect distinct perceptual mechanisms With varied relationships to face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(12), 1961–1973. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000400
   Google Scholar
• Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1281–1302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037004
   Google Scholar
• Richler, J. J., Gauthier, I., Wenger, M. J., & Palmeri, T. J. (2008). Holistic processing of faces: Perceptual and decisional components., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.328
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, L. C. (1996). Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.125.3.227
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128(2), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2009). Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 132(3), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2013). The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception. Visual Cognition, 21(2), 139–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.772929
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401045
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Simonyi, D. (2016). The “parts and wholes” of face recognition: A review of the literature. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(April), 1876–1889. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780
   Google Scholar
• Ventura, P., Leite, I., Ferreira, M., Farinha-Fernandes, A., Delgado, J., Faustino, B., Guerreiro, J. C., & Raposo, I. (2019). Holistic face processing is penetrable … depending on the composite design. Visual Cognition, 27(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1633002
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., … Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Li, J., Fang, H., Tian, M., & Liu, J. (2012). Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability. Psychological Science, 23(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611420575
   Google Scholar
• Weston, N. J., & Perfect, T. J. (2005). Effects of processing bias on the recognition of composite face halves. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 1038–1042. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206440
   Google Scholar
• Weston, N. J., Perfect, T. J., Schooler, J. W., & Dennis, I. (2008). Navon processing and verbalisation: A holistic/featural distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20:3, 587–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701728557
   Google Scholar
• Wong, H. K., Estudillo, A. J., Stephen, I. D., & Keeble, D. R. T. (2021). The other-race effect and holistic processing across racial groups. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 8507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87933-1
   Google Scholar
• Young, A., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(July), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1068/p160747
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., Li, X., Chow, K., & Liu, J. (2009). The part task of the part-spacing paradigm Is Not a pure measurement of part-based information of faces. PLoS ONE, 4(7), e6239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006239
   Google Scholar