The flexibility of the intermediate vs. wholistic/analytic styles – an eye tracking study

References

• Bendall, R. C., Lambert, S., Galpin, A., Marrow, L. P., & Cassidy, S. (2019). Psychophysiological indices of cognitive style: A triangulated study incorporating neuroimaging, eye-tracking, psychometric and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendall, R. C. A., & Thompson, C. (2015). Emotion has no impact on attention in a change detection flicker task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1592), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01592
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braem, S., & Egner, T. (2018). Getting a grip on cognitive flexibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418787475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. G., Tenbrink, A. P., & LaMarre, G. (2019). Performance while distracted: The effect of cognitive styles and working memory. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañas, J., Quesada, J., Antolí, A., & Fajardo, I. (2003). Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 46(5), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000061640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2004). Cognitive modeling of student learning in web-based instructional programs. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(3), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1703_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. Computer, (9), 17-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1987.1663693
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2009). A detailed analysis of the wholist-analytic style ratio: A methodology for developing a reliable and valid measure of style [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Glamorgan/Prifysgol Morgannwg.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2006). Wholist-analytic cognitive style: A matter of reflection. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(6), 989–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2006). Towards inclusive teacher education: Sensitising individuals to how they learn. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 26(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342484
   Google Scholar
• Graff, M. (2000). The intermediate style position. In R. J. Riding, & S. G. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences (pp. 65–78). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Graff, M. (2003). Assessing learning from hypertext: An individual differences perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(4), 425–438.
   Google Scholar
• Graff, M. (2006). Constructing and maintaining an effective hypertext-based learning environment: Web-based learning and cognitive style. Education + Training, 48(2/3), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910610651773
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Liu, M., Wang, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020). Wholist-analytic cognitive styles modulate object-based attentional selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(10), 1596–1604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820921345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., & Spiro, R. J. (2021). Design for now, but with the future in mind: A “cognitive flexibility theory” perspective on online learning through the lens of MOOCs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09920-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izmalkova, A., & Rzheshevskaya, A. (2021). Graphological and semantic foregrounding as affecting gaze and speech of impulsive and reflective readers. ARPHA Preprints, 1(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e78874
   Google Scholar
• Koć-Januchta, M., Hoffler, T., Thoma, G. B., Prechtl, H., & Leutner, D. (2017). Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – An eye-tracking study. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(2017), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028
   Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., Evans, C., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2014). Cognitive style as environmentally sensitive individual differences in cognition: A modern synthesis and applications in education, business, and management. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614525555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacko, D., Prošek, T., Čeněk, J., Helísková, M., Ugwitz, P., Svoboda, V., Počaji, P., Vais, M., Halířová, H., Sasinka, C., & Juřík, V. (2021). A Preregistered Validation Study of Methods Measuring Analytic and Holistic Cognitive Styles: What do We Actually Measure and How Well?. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p6hr7.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, M. L., Tsai, M. J., Yang, F. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Liu, T. C., Lee, S. W. Y., Lee, M. H., Chiou, G. L., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1996). Bridging cognition and personality in education: The role of style in performance and development. European Journal of Personality, 10(5), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5<353::AID-PER268>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miellet, S., Vizioli, L., He, L., Zhou, X., & Caldara, R. (2013). Mapping face recognition information use across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., Nuerk, H. C., & Willmes, K. (2009). Sequential or parallel decomposed processing of two-digit numbers? Evidence from eye-tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210801946740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisiforou, E., & Laghos, A. (2016). Field dependence–independence and eye movement patterns: Investigating users’ differences through an eye tracking study. Interacting with Computers, 28(4), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisiforou, E. A., Michailidou, E., & Laghos, A. (2014). Using eye tracking to understand the impact of cognitive abilities on search tasks. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 46–57). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Nitzan-Tamar, O., Kramarski, B., & Vakil, E. (2016). Eye movement patterns characteristic of cognitive style: Wholistic versus analytic. Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R. (2005). Verbal imagery cognitive styles test & extended cognitive style analysis-wholistic analytic test. Administration guide. University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., & Austin, E. J. (2003). The reliability of Riding’s cognitive styles analysis test. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 881–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00116-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. R., & Meissel, K. (2015). The effect of cognitive style analysis (CSA) test on achievement: A meta-analytic review. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in Reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in Reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, A. R., & Katz, L. (2004). Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the cognitive styles analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1317–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00219-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R. (1998). Cognitive styles analysis—research applications. Learning and Training Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., & Caine, T. (1993). Cognitive style and GCSE performance in mathematics, English language and French. Educational Psychology, 13(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341930130107
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110301
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2019). Domain-specific interpretation of eye tracking data: Towards a refined use of the eye-mind hypothesis for the field of geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-9878-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1227–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, G., & Kim, C. (2015). Neural correlates of cognitive style and flexible cognitive control. Neuroimage, 113, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Gaunt, A., Hu, Y., Klautke, H., Cheng, C., Clemente, I., Leahy, S., & Ward, P. (2019). Cognitive Flexibility Theory and the accelerated development of adaptive readiness and adaptive response to novelty. In P. Ward, J. Schraagen, J. Gore, & E. Roth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of expertise (pp. 951–976). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, C., & Bavelier, D. (2012). The role of selective attention on academic foundations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil, E., Lifshitz, H., Tzuriel, D., Weiss, I., & Arzuoan, Y. (2011). Analogies solving by individuals with and without intellectual disability: Different cognitive patterns as indicated by eye movements. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 846–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkin, H. A., Oilman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures tests. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar