Thinking about meaning: level-of-processing modulates semantic auditory distraction

References

• Banbury, S. P., Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775992462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P. (2004). The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: What role for working memory capacity?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(5), 1106–1118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P. (2005). Auditory distraction from low-intensity noise: A review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(8), 1041–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P., Hanczakowski, M., Hodgetts, H. M., Marsh, J. E., & Jones, D. M. (2013). Memory as discrimination: What distraction reveals. Memory & Cognition, 41(8), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0327-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1997). Role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing-state hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(2), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 51(3), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Mund, I. (2008). Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects. Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C., McDermott, K. B., Watson, J. M., & Gallo, D. A. (2005). The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coane, J. H., McBride, D. M., Termonen, M. L., & Cutting, J. C. (2016). Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations. Memory & Cognition, 44(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0543-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046671
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dodhia, R. M., & Metcalfe, J. (1999). False memories and source monitoring. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16(3-5), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432999380898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, D. A. (2010). False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion. Memory & Cognition, 38(7), 833–848. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.7.833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, D. A., Meadow, N. G., Johnson, E. L., & Foster, K. T. (2008). Deep levels of processing elicit a distinctiveness heuristic: Evidence from the criterial recollection task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 1095–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, D. A., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2001). Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanczakowski, M., Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (2016). Negative priming in free recall reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(5), 686–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanczakowski, M., Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (2017). When distraction benefits memory through semantic similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanczakowski, M., & Mazzoni, G. (2012). Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied. Memory (Hove, England), 19(3), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.558514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, M. K., Gunn, J. B., Fazio, L. K., & Polyn, S. M. (2024). The modulation and elimination of temporal organization in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2024-39440-001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R., & Jones, D. M. (2001). The intrusiveness of sound: Laboratory findings and their implications for noise abatement. Noise and Health, 4(13), 51–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(4), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R., & Smith, R. E. (1996). Accessing the particular from the general: The power of distinctiveness in the context of organization. Memory & Cognition, 24(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R., Smith, R. E., & Dunlap, K. R. (2011). How does distinctive processing reduce false recall? Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, L., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 577–581. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Nicholls, A. P. (2004). The phonological store of working memory: Is it phonological and is it a store? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(3), 656–674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44(4), 645–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linklater, R. D., Judge, J., Sörqvist, P., & Marsh, J. E. (2024). Auditory distraction of vocal-motor behaviour by different components of song: testing an interference-by-process account. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 101–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2284404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1976). Depth of processing, recognition, and recall: Some aspects of a general memory system. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 75–102). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MacDermid, A. E., Duggan, V. A., Miller, B. L., Neath, I., & Surprenant, A. M. (2023). Irrelevant speech, changing state, and order information. Memory & Cognition, 51(8), 1836–1848. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-023-01437-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Beaman, C. P., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2012). Inhibitory control in memory: Evidence for negative priming in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2008). Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A process-based approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2009). Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., Sörqvist, P., Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (2015). Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1728–1740. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Perham, N., Sörqvist, P., & Jones, D. M. (2014). Boundaries of semantic distraction: Dominance and lexicality act at retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 42(8), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0438-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Sörqvist, P., Hodgetts, H. M., Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (2015). Distraction control processes in free recall: Benefits and costs to performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Sörqvist, P., & Hughes, R. W. (2015). Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1462–1474. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Wogalter, M. S., & Forlano, J. G. (1988). Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90063-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (1998). Attempting to avoid illusory memories: Robust false recognition of associates persists under conditions of explicit warnings and immediate testing. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, V. A., Lutfi-Proctor, D. A., & Elliott, E. M. (2021). The role of joint influence on the cross-modal stroop effect: Investigating time course and asymmetry. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 4(3-4), 186–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2022.2034394
   Google Scholar
• Meng, Z., Lan, Z., Yan, G., Marsh, J. E., & Liversedge, S. P. (2020). Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(10), 1892–1905. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Z., Yan, G., Marsh, J. E., & Liversedge, S. P. (2024a). Effects of irrelevant speech on semantic and phonological judgments of Chinese characters. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2024.2330726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Z., Yan, G., Marsh, J. E., & Liversedge, S. P. (2024b). Primary task demands modulate background speech disruption during reading of Chinese tongue twisters. Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
   Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S., Rielger, G. L., & Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(4), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, C. B., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Memory & Cognition, 27(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2000). The effects of a levels-of-processing manipulation on false recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(1), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. J., & Roediger, H. L., III. (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition. Psychological Science, 8(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Körner, U., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2017). Attentional capture by taboo words: A functional view of auditory distraction. Emotion, 17(4), 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L., & Wiseman, A. L. (2006). Reducing memory errors: The distinctiveness heuristic. In R. R. Hunt, & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 89–107). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169669.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 710–715. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Marsh, J. E., & Jahncke, H. (2010). Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction. Brain and Cognition, 74(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapar, A., & McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 424–432. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toglia, M. P. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less. Memory (Hove, England), 7(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/741944069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., Nicholls, A. P., Alford, D., & Jones, D. M. (2000). The irrelevant sound effect: Does speech play a special role? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1750–1754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(3), 289–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootan, S. S., & Leding, J. K. (2015). Need for cognition and false memory: Can one’s natural processing style be manipulated by external factors? The American Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.4.0459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar