An innovative ship salvage concept and its effect on the hull structural response

References

• Alexander DE. 2012. The ‘Titanic Syndrome’: risk and crisis management on the Costa Concordia. Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 9(1): article no. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander KE, Myers JR, Blaser B. 1986. High-pressure impingement mixing method for foam-in-salvage. January 1; Houston (TX): Offshore Technology Conference.
   Google Scholar
• American Bureau of Shipping. 2010. Guide for rapid response damage assessment. Houston, TX: American Bureau of Shipping (ABS).
   Google Scholar
• Anastasia V. 2014. Different methods of refloating a ship. Adv Mat Res. 837:792–797.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM A131 / A131M-14, Standard Specification for Structural Steel for Ships. 2014. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew CA, Marsh B, Hooper R. 1992. U.S. Navy Salvage Engineer’s Handbook: Salvage engineering. Washington (DC): Direction of Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant JT. 1970. Study of gas generators for ship salvage buoyancy systems. China Lake (CA): Naval Weapons Center. AD-879173.
   Google Scholar
• Burgherr P. 2007. In-depth analysis of accidental oil spills from tankers in the context of global spill trends from all sources. J Hazard Mater. 140(1):245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carithers L, Tibbert E. 1981. Buoyant Lift Systems for the Salvage Navy. San Diego (CA): Naval Ocean Systems Center. AD A10A 062.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu CS, Liu CP, Chang KY, Tseng WJ, Chen YW. 2017. Cost of salvage – a comparative form approach. J. Mar Sci Technol. 25(6):742–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ćorak M, Parunov J, Guedes Soares C. 2017. Structural reliability assessment of an oil tanker accidentally grounded in the Adriatic Sea. Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering – OMAE; June 25–30; Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanak MR, Xiros NI. 2016. Springer handbook of ocean engineering. London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fang C, Das PK. 2005. Survivability and reliability of damaged ships after collision and grounding. Ocean Eng. 32(3):293–307. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer N. 2013. LCC Results: Calculation of life cycle costs based on design experiences and pilot implementation. In: Reinhard A (editor). Surface System for ship recovery (SuSy). Bremen: BALance Technology Consulting GmbH, p. 4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gerigk M. 2012. Assessment of safety of ships after the collision and during the ship salvage using the matrix type risk model and uncertainties. Sustainable maritime transportation and exploitation of sea resources – Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean; Genova, Italy: IMAM; (2): p. 715–719.
   Google Scholar
• Gordo JM, Guedes Soares C. 1996. Approximate method to evaluate the hull girder collapse strength. Mar Struct. 9:449–470. doi: 10.1016/0951-8339(95)00030-5
   Google Scholar
• Grey CJ. 1999. The cost of oil spills from tankers: an analysis of IOPC fund incidents. International Oil Spill Conference, American Petroleum Institute, p. 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• IACS. 2010. Common structural rules for double hull tankers. London: International Association of Classification Societies.
   Google Scholar
• ITOPF. 2016. Oil tanker spill statistics 2015. London: The international tanker owners pollution federation limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen H. 1999. Design for safety with an integrated design and operational tool design-NAPA and onboard-NAPA. WEGEMT Design for Safety Conference; October; Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DK, Pedersen PT, Paik JK, Kim HB, Zhang X, Kim MS. 2013. Safety guidelines of ultimate hull girder strength for grounded container ships [article]. Saf Sci. 59:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimrey CM, Cocanour A. 2011. SS princess Kathleen and Ex-USS Chehalis-guideposts to wreck oil removal. Int Oil Spill Conf Proc. 2011(1):abs288.
   Google Scholar
• Luís RM, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C. 2009. Longitudinal strength reliability of a tanker hull accidentally grounded [article]. Struct Saf. 31(3):224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer L. 2017. Vessel salvage with environmental concerns: spirit of sacramento salvaged with eye on pollution prevention [article]. Sea Technol. 58(7):28–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navy US. 2000. U.S. navy Salvor’s handbook. Washington, DC: Naval Sea Systems Command and JMS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Navy US. 2013. U.S. navy salvage manual Vol. 1, strandings, harbor clearance and afloat salvage. Washington, DC: Naval Sea Systems Command and JMS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen T-H, Garrè L, Amdahl J, Leira BJ. 2011. Monitoring of ship damage condition during stranding. Mar Struct. 24(3):261–274. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Kim DK, Park DH, Kim HB, Kim MS. 2012. A new method for assessing the safety of ships damaged by grounding. Trans R Inst Nav Archit Part A Int J Marit Eng. 154(PART A1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Thayamballi AK, Yang SH. 1998. Residual strength assessment of ships after collision and grounding. Mar Technol. 35(1):38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Pan DW, Lin CX, Sun DP, Zhou CY, Xu P. 2014. Hydrostatics analysis on the uprighting process of a capsized ship. Appl Mech Mater. 529:303–307. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.529.303
   Google Scholar
• Pollalis C, Samuelides MS. 2013. Ultimate strength of damaged hulls. 6th international conference on collision and grounding of ships and offshore structures, ICCGS 2013; June 17–19; Trondheim, Norway. p. 297–304.
   Google Scholar
• Velayudhan AKD, Srinil N, Barltrop N. 2012. A new ship recovery concept and design using adaptively controlled buoyancy systems. Proceedings of 11th international marine design conference; June 11–14; Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ventikos NP, Koimtzoglou A, Louzis K. 2014. Shipwreck: a crisis with challenging solutions. J Risk Anal Crisis Response. 4(3):160–174. doi: 10.2991/jrarc.2014.4.3.5
   Google Scholar
• Wade N. 1975. Deep-sea salvage: did CIA use Mohole techniques to raise sub? Science. 188(4189):710–713. doi: 10.1126/science.188.4189.710
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang G, Chen Y, Zhang H, Peng H. 2002. Longitudinal strength of ships with accidental damages [article]. Mar Struct. 15(2):119–138. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8339(01)00018-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins J. 2004. US navy salvage report USS Mississinewa oil removal operations. Washington, DC: Naval Sea Systems Command.
   Google Scholar
• Winner A, Searle WF. 1970. Plastic foams for marine salvage. Nav Eng J. 82(4):97–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1970.tb03527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada Y. 2009. The cost of oil spills from tankers in relation to weight of spilled oil. Mar Technol. 46(4):219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Youssef SAM, Faisal M, Seo JK, Kim BJ, Ha YC, Kim DK, Paik JK, Cheng F, Kim MS. 2016. Assessing the risk of ship hull collapse due to collision. Ships Offshore Struct. 11(4):335–350. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2014.993110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Dai L, Gan J, Li J, Gao X. 2016. Safety analysis of shipwreck salvage operations based on AQWA. J Wuhan Univ Technol (Transp Sci Eng). 40(3):466–471.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao M. 1989. Discussion on uprighting big-angle tilted sunken ships underwater in salvage operation. China Ocean Eng. 3(2):217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Zilakos I, Toulios M. 2018. On modelling and simulation of innovative ship rescue system. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. doi:10.1115/1.4040303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilakos IK, Karatzas VA, Chatzidouros EV, Papazoglou VJ. 2011. Simulation of external application of SuSy devices on an Aframax tanker that has been structurally compromised. International conference on design and operation of tankers; June 8–9; Athens, Greece, p. 121–130.
   Google Scholar