Ship acceleration motion under the action of a propulsion system: a combined empirical method for simulation and optimisation

References

• Altosole M, Benvenuto G, Campora U, Silvestro F, Terlizzi G. 2018. Efficiency improvement of a natural gas marine engine using a hybrid turbocharger. Energies. 11(8):1924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altosole M, Benvenuto G, Figari M, Coampora U. 2008. Real-time simulation of a COGAG naval ship propulsion system. In Proceedings of Maritime Industry, Ocean Engineering and Coastal Resources – Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean, IMAM 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Altosole M, Benvenuto G, Zaccone R, Campora U. 2020. Comparison of saturated and superheated steam plants for waste-heat recovery of dual-fuel marine engines. J Mar Sci Eng. 7(5):138.
   Google Scholar
• Altosole M, Campora U, Figari M, Laviola M, Martelli M. 2019. A diesel engine modelling approach for ship propulsion real-time simulators. J Mar Sci Eng. 7(5):138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altosole M, Figari M. 2011. Effective simple methods for numerical modelling of marine engines in ship propulsion control systems design. J Naval Archit Mar Eng. 8(2):129–147.
   Google Scholar
• Altosole M, Figari M, Bagnasco A, Maffioleti L. 2007. Design and test of the propulsion control of the Aircraft Carrier ‘cavour’ using real-time hardware in the loop simulation, In Proceedings of the SISO European Simulation Interoperability Workshop 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dagan G. 1972. Small Froude number paradoxes and wave resistance at low speeds. Tech. Rep. 7103-4, Hydronautics Inc., Laurel, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dashtimanesh A, Tavakoli S, Kohansal A, Khosravani R, Ghassemzadeh A. 2020. Numerical study on a heeled one-stepped boat moving forward in planing regime. Appl Ocean Res. 96:102057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfandiari A, Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A. 2019. Comparison between the dynamic behavior of the non-stepped and double-stepped planing hulls in rough water: a numerical study. J Ship Prod Des. 36(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando M, Scamardella A, Bose N, Liu P, Veitch B. 2002. Performance of a family of surface piercing propellers. Trans R. Inst Naval Architects Part A: Int J Maritime Eng. 144:63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Figari M, Altosole M. 2007. Dynamic behaviour and stability of marine propulsion systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M: J Eng Maritime Environ. 221:187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Froude RE. 1881. On the leading phenomena of the wave-making resistance of ships. Trans Inst Naval Architects. 22:220–245.
   Google Scholar
• Froude RE. 1888. On the ‘constant’ system of notation of results of experiments on models used at the admiralty experiments works. Trans Inst Naval Architects. 29:304–318.
   Google Scholar
• Geertsma RD, Negenborn RR, Visser K, Hopman JJ. 2016. Torque control for diesel mechanical and hybrid propulsion for naval vessels. Proceedings of the 13th INEC, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Geertsma RD, Negenborn RR, Visser K, Hopman JJ. 2017. Pitch control for ships with diesel mechanical and hybrid propulsion: modelling, validation and performance quantification. Appl Energy. 226:1609–1631.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A, Pirooz A. 2014. Developing a computer program for detailed study of planing hull’s spray based on Morabito’s approach. J Mar Sci Appl. 13:402–415.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A, Zamanian R. 2017. Steady performance prediction of a heeled planning craft in calm water using asymmetric 2D+T model. P I Mech Eng M-J Eng. 231(1):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvald SA. 1983. Resistance and propulsion of ships, Volume 12 of Ocean engineering, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmining. 1962. Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Holtrop J. 1984a. A statistical re-analysis of resistance and propulsion data. Int Shipbuilding Prog. 31:272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Holtrop J. 1984b. A statistical resistance prediction method with a speed dependent form factor. In Scientific and Methodological Seminar on Ship Hydrodynamics (SMSSH ‘84), Varna, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Holtrop J, Mennen G. 1978. A statistical power prediction method. Int Shipbuilding Prog. 25:253–256.
   Google Scholar
• Holtrop J, Mennen G. 1982. An approximate power prediction method. Int Shipbuilding Prog. 29:166–170.
   Google Scholar
• Huang L, Li M, Romu T, Dolatshah A, Thomas G. 2020. Simulation of a ship operating in an open-water ice channel, ships and offshore structures. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2020.1729595
   Google Scholar
• Huang L, Ren K, Li M, Tukovic Z, Cardiff P, Thomas G. 2019. Fluid-structure interaction of a large ice sheet in waves. Ocean Eng. 181:102–111.
   Google Scholar
• Huang L, Thomas G. 2019. Simulation of wave interaction with a circular ice floe. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 141(4):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes G. 1954. Friction and form resistance in turbulent flow, and a proposed formulation for use in model and ship correlation. Trans Inst Naval Architects. 96:314–376.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2015. Third IMO greenhouse gas study 2014, exec, summary and final report, Technical Report, IMO, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 1957. 8th International Towing Tank Conference, Madrid Spain. ITTC. Available at www.ittc.info.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 1978. Proceedings of the 15th ITTC, The Hague, The Netherlands. Netherlands Ship Model Basin.
   Google Scholar
• Javanmardi N, Ghadimi P, Tavakoli S. 2018. Probing into the effects of cavitation on hydrodynamic characteristics of surface piercing propellers through numerical modeling of oblique water entry of a thin wedge. Brodogradnja: Teorija i praksa brodogradnje i pomorske tehnike. 69(1):151–168.
   Google Scholar
• Keller J. 1966. Enige Aspecten Bij Het Antwerpen Van Scheepsschroeven. Schpen Werf 24.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson L, Raven HC. 2010. Ship resistance and flow: The Principles of Naval Architecture Series, SNAME, Jersey City, NJ, US.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson L, Stern F, Bertram V. 2003. Benchmarking of computational fluid dynamics for ship flows: The Gothenburg 2000 workshop. Journal of Ship Research. 47(1):63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niazmand Bilandi R, Dashtimanesh A, Tavakoli S. 2020. Hydrodynamic study of heeled double-stepped planing hulls using CFD and 2D+ T method. Ocean Eng. 196:106813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odetti M, Altosole M, Bruzzone G, Caccia M, Viviani M. 2019. Design and construction of a modular pump-jet thruster for autonomous surface vehicle operations in extremely shallow water. J Mar Sci Eng. 7(7):222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie TF. 1968. Wave resistance: The low-speed limit. Report No. 002. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Michigan, Dept. Nav. Arch. Mar. Eng. (MARIN): Wageningen, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Olivieri A, Pistani F, Avanzini A, Stern F, Penna R. 2001. Towing tank experiments of resistance, sinkage and trim, boundary layer, wake, and free surface flow around a naval combatant insean 2340 model, IIHR Technical Report No. 421.
   Google Scholar
• Olivieri A, Pistani F, De Mascio A. 2003. Breaking wave at the bow of a fast displacement ship model. J Mar Sci Technol. 8(2):68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterveld MWC. 1970. Wake adapted ducted propellers, NSMB Wageningen Publication No. 345.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterveld MWC. 1973. Ducted propeller characteristics. RINA Symposium on Ducted Propellers.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterveld MWC, Ossannen PV. 1975. Further computer-analyzed data of Wageningen B-screw series. ISP, 22(251):3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds O. 1883. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and the law of resistance in parallel channels. Philos Trans R. Soc. 174:935–998.
   Google Scholar
• Roskilly AP, Palacin R, Yan J. 2015. Novel technologies and strategies for clean transport systems. Appl Energy. 157:533–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotte GM. 2015. Analysis of a hybrid RaNS-BEM method for predicting ship power, M.Sc thesis, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A. 2019. A six-DOF theoretical model for steady turning maneuver of a planing hull. Ocean Eng. 189:106328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli S, Najafi S, Amini E, Dashtimanesh A. 2018. Performance of high-speed planing hulls accelerating from rest under the action of a surface piercing propeller and an outboard engine. Appl Ocean Res. 77:45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toxopeus S. 1996. A time domain simulation program for maneuvering of planing ships. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• van Oortmerssen G. 1971. Power prediction method and its application to small ships, Netherlands Ship Model Basin. Wageningen, Netherland: Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Zaccone M, Ottaviani E, Figari M, Altosole M. 2018. Ship voyage optimization for safe and energy-efficient navigation: a dynamic programming approach. Ocean Eng. 153:215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar