267
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue

The views of service users on the accessibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapy

&

References

  • Beail, N., and Williams, K. 2014. Using qualitative methods in research with people who have intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27, 85–96. doi: 10.1111/jar.12088
  • Booth, T., & Booth, W. 1996. Sounds of Silence: Narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disability and Society, 11, 55–69. doi: 10.1080/09687599650023326
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Braun, V., and Clarke, V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London, UK: Sage.
  • Clarke, C., et al. 2005. Paradoxes, locations and the need for social coherence: A qualitative study of living with a learning difficulty. Disability & Society, 20, 405–419. doi: 10.1080/09687590500086534
  • Department of Health. 2001. Valuing people: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/250877/5086.pdf.
  • Department of Health. 2009. Valuing people now: A new three-year strategy for people with learning disabilities. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_093375.pdf.
  • Hovarth, A. O., et al. 2011. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. In: J. C. Norcross, ed. Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–69.
  • Horvath, A. O., and Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 38, 139. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139
  • James, C. W., and Stacey, J. M. 2014. The effectiveness of psychodynamic interventions for people with learning disabilities: A systematic review. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 19, 17–24. doi: 10.1108/TLDR-10-2012-0009
  • Khan, M. M., and Beail, N. 2013. Service user satisfaction with individual psychotherapy for people with intellectual disabilities. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 7, 277–283. doi: 10.1108/AMHID-06-2013-0046
  • Klein, M. 1950. On the criteria for termination of analysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 31, 78–80. Available at: http://freudians.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Klein-On-the-Criteria-for-the-Termination-of-a-Psycho-Analysis.pdf.
  • Kramer, S. A. 1990. Positive endings in psychotherapy: Bringing meaningful closure to therapeutic relationships. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • MacDonald, J., et al. 2003. An interview study of people with learning disabilities’ experience of, and satisfaction with, group analytic therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 76, 433–453. doi: 10.1348/147608303770584764
  • Macneil, C. A., et al. 2010. Termination of therapy: What can clinicians do to maximise gains? Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 22, 43–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5215.2009.00443.x
  • Malan, D. 1995. Individual psychotherapy and the science of psychodynamics. 2nd ed.. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Martin, D. J., et al. 2000. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta- analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.68.3.438
  • Maxwell, R. 1984. Quality assessment in health. British Medical Journal, 288, 1470–1472. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6428.1470
  • Merriman, C., and Beail, N. 2009. Service user views of long-term individual psychodynamic psychotherapy. Advances in Mental Health and Learning Disabilities, 3, 42–47. doi: 10.1108/17530180200900020
  • Myers, F., et al. 1998. Outside looking in? Studies of the community integration of people with learning disabilities. Disability and Society, 13, 389–413. doi: 10.1080/09687599826704
  • Parry, G. 1992. Improving psychotherapy services: Applications of research, audit and evaluation. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00964.x
  • Parry, G. 1996. Service evaluation and audit methods. In: G. Parry & F. N. Watts, eds. Behavioural and mental health research: A handbook of skills and methods. East Sussex, UK: Erlbaum, pp. 423–449.
  • Quintana, S. M., and Holahan, W. 1992. Termination in short-term counselling: Comparison of successful and unsuccessful cases. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 39, 299–305. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.39.3.299
  • Safran, J. D., et al. 2011. Repairing alliance ruptures. In: J. C. Norcross, ed. Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 224–238.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.001.0001
  • Schlesinger, H. J. 2005. Endings and beginnings: On the technique of terminating psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. New Jersey, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Shepherd, C., and Beail, N. 2017. A systematic review of the effectiveness of psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic and psychodynamic psychotherapy with adults with intellectual disabilities: Progress and challenges. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 31, 94–117.10.1080/02668734.2017.1286610
  • Sinason, V. 1992. Mental handicap and the human condition: New approaches from the Tavistock. London, UK: Free Association Books.
  • Stiles, W. B., et al. 1990. Assimilation of problematic experiences by clients in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 411–420. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.27.3.411
  • Van Audenhove, C. and Vertommen, H. 2000. A negotiation approach to intake and treatment choice. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 10, 287–299. doi: 10.1023/A:1009401129920
  • Wampold, B. E. 2015. How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14, 270–277. doi: 10.1002/wps.20238
  • Watzke, B., et al. (2010). Effectiveness of systematic treatment selection for psychodynamic and cognitive–behavioural therapy: Randomised controlled trial in routine mental healthcare. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 197, 96–105. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.072835

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.