Developing and sustaining readers with intellectual and multiple disabilities: A systematic review of literature

References

• Alnahdi, G. H. 2015. Teaching reading for students with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. International Education Studies, 8, 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Allor, J. H, et al. 2010a. Methods of increasing the intensity of reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities. Education & Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 500–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allor, J. H, et al. 2010b. Comprehensive reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Findings from the first three years of a longitudinal study. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 445–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberto, P. A, et al. 2010. Teaching the reading of connected text through sight-word instruction to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1467–1474.[https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(10)00106-X] doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M, et al. 2011. Using shared stories and individual modes to promote comprehension and engagement in literacy for students with multiple, severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M, et al. 2006. Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M. and Xin, Y. P. 1998. A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate to severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 130–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W, et al. 2010. Summer employment and community experiences of transition-age youth with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76, 194–212. Retrieved from http://libproxy.library.wmich.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/201197548?acountid=15099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. T, et al. 2008. Using a three-step decoding strategy with constant time delay to teach word reading to students with mild and moderate mental retardation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dilveko, J. 2007. Guest editorial: Reading literature and literature reviews. Library and Information Science Research, 29, 451–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellery, V. 2009. Creating strategic reader: Techniques for developing competency in phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. 2nd ed. Newark, DL: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ellery, V. and Rosenboom, J. 2011. Sustaining strategic reader: Techniques for supporting content literacy in grades 6–12. Newark, DL: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fenlon, A., et al. 2010. “So much potential in reading!”: Developing meaningful literacy routines for students with multiple disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43, 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrick, L., et al. 2013. From Initial to functional phonics: teaching word-analysis-skills to students with moderate intellectual disability, Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., et al. 2005. Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D. 2016. Phonics based reading interventions for students with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5, 205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., et al. 2005. The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, M. E. and Browder, D. M. 2014. Improving listening comprehension responses for students with moderate intellectual disability during literacy class. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. and Seery, M. 2004. Where is the phonics? A review of the literature on the use of phonetic analysis with students with mental retardation. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 55–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katims, S. 2000. Literacy instruction for people with mental retardation: Historical highlights and contemporary analysis. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kliewer, C. and Biklen, D. 2001. “School’s not really a place for reading”: A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. W. and Johns, B. H. 2015. Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities. 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. 2014. The effects of read-aloud accommodations for students with and without disabilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 33, 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I. and Reichenberg, M., 2013. Developing reading comprehension among students with mild intellectual disabilities: An intervention study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57, 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mims, P., et al. 2012. Using read-alouds of grade-level biographies and systematic prompting to promote comprehension for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, S. 2009. From isolation to combination: a multi-step, multi-component approach to developing literacy skills of students with cognitive impairments. Reading Improvement, 46, 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, S. and Barkley, E. 2009. Read and reach the whole child: using adapted/created/enhanced (ACE) stories for content representation. Reading Improvement, 46, 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ratz, C. and Lenhard, W. 2013. Reading skills among students with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1740–1748.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruwe, K., et al. 2011. The multiple effects of direct instruction flashcards on sight word acquisition, passage reading, and errors for three middle school students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23, 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnorr, R. F. 2011. Intensive reading instruction for learners with developmental disabilities. The Reading Teacher, 65, 35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamseer, L., et al. 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647. Retrieved from http://www.prismastatement.org/Extensions/Protocols.aspx
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shurr, J. and Taber-Doughty, T. 2012. Increasing comprehension of middle school students with moderate intellectual disability on age-appropriate texts. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 359–372. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23879971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas G. E. 1996. Teaching students with mental retardation: A life goal curriculum planning approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Bijl C, et al. 2006. A comparison of two strategies of sight word instruction in children with mental disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, R. E, et al. 2009. Using simultaneous prompting to teach sounds and blending skills to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1435–1447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar