Assessment of adaptive behaviour in children with intellectual disability in Oman: an examination of ABAS-3 factor structure and validation in the Arab context

References

• Acquadro, C., Jambon, B., Ellis, D. and Marquis, P. 1996. Language and translation issues. In: B. Spilker, ed. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, pp. 575–586.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Balushi, T., Al-Badi, A. H. and Ali, S. 2011. Prevalence of disability in Oman: statistics and challenges. Canadian Journal of Applied Sciences, 1(3), 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2002. Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, B., Verdugo, M. Á., Navas, P. and Gómez, L. E. 2013. Factor structure of the construct of adaptive behaviour in children with and without intellectual disability. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13(2), 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aricak, O. T. and Oakland, T. 2009. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis for the teacher form, ages 5–21, of the Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System-II. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aricak, O. T. and Oakland, T. 2010. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis for the teacher form, ages 5 to 21, of the Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System-II. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(6), 578–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruininks, R., Woodcock, R., Weatherman, R. and Hill, B. 1996. Scales of independent behaviour-revised. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. 2007. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W. and Rensvold, R. B. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. structural equation modeling. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. G., Shands, E. I., Alfonso, V. C., Phillips, J. F., Autry, B. K., Mosteller, J. A., … and Irby, S. 2015. A systematic review and psychometric evaluation of adaptive behaviour scales and recommendations for practice. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(1), 83–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D. and Mallery, M. 2010. SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. 10th. ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K. 2005. Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In: R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda and C. D. Spielberger, eds., Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. and Oakland, T. 2003. Adaptive behaviour assessment system-(ABAS-II). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. and Oakland, T. 2015. Adaptive behaviour assessment system. 3rd ed. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. 2005, Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, N., Nihira, K. and Leland, H. 1993. Adaptive Behaviour Scale—School, 2nd ed. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntinx, W. H., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M. P., Reeve, A. , Schalock, R. L., Snell, M. E., Spitalnik, D. M., Spreat, S. and Tasse, M. J. 2002. Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntinx, W. H., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M. P., Reeve, A., Schalock, R. L., Snell, M. E., Spitalnik, D. M., Spreat, S. and Tasse, M. J. 1992. Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. and Bruininks, R. H. 1989. The factor structure of adaptive behaviour. School Psychology Review, 18, 64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicholas, P. J., Floyd, R. G., Woods, I. L., Jr., Singh, L. J., Manguno, M. S. and Maki, K. E. 2018. State special education criteria for identifying intellectual disability: A review following revised diagnostic criteria and Rosa's Law. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed Emam, M. 2016. Management of inclusive education in Oman: A framework for Action. Support for Learning, 31(4), 296–312.
   Google Scholar
• Noland, R. M. and McCallum, R. S. 2000. A comparison of parent and teacher ratings of adaptive behaviour using a universal measure. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18(1), 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakland, T. and Algina, J. 2011. Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System-II parent/primary caregiver form: Ages 0–5: Its factor structure and other implications for practice. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27(2), 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland, T. and Daley, M. 2013. Adaptive behaviour: Its history, concepts, assessment, and applications. In: K. F. Geisinger, ed., APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 3: Testing and assessment in school psychology and education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 183–212.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland, T. and Harrison, P. 2008. Some historical background for adaptive behaviour and its use. In: T. Oakland and P. Harrison, eds., Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System–II: Clinical uses and interpretations. New York: Elsevier, pp. 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland, T., Iliescu, D., Chen, H. Y. and Chen, J. H. 2013. Cross-national assessment of adaptive behaviour in three countries. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(5), 435–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J., Morris, Z. and Costello, S. 2018. The application of adaptive behaviour models: a systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 8(11), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Reckase, M. D. 1997. A linear logistic multidimensional model for dichotomous item response data. In: W. J. van der Linden and R. K. Hambleton, eds., Handbook of modern item response theory.New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 271–286.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, G. E., Hocken, K. and Auty, J. M. 2018. The reliability and validity of the Adaptive Functioning Assessment Tool in UK custodial settings. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalock, R. L. 1999. Adaptive behaviour and its measurement: Implications for the field of mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• Schalock, R. L., Buntinx, W. H. E., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V., Craig, E. M., Coulter, D. L., … Yeager, M. H. 2010. Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and system of supports, 11th ed. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. and Müller, H. 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schoua-Glusberg, A. S. 1992. Report on the translation of the questionnaire for the National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. and King, J. 2006. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V. and Balla, D. A. 2005. Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales, Second edition: survey forms manual. Circles Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Tassé, M. J. and Craig, E. M. 1999. Critical issues in the cross-cultural assessment of adaptive behaviour. In: R. L. Schalock, ed., Adaptive behaviour and its measurement: Implications for the field of mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation, pp. 161–184.
   Google Scholar
• Tassé, M. J., Schalock, R. L., Balboni, G., Bersani, H. Jr, Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Spreat, S., Thissen, D., Widaman, K. F. and Zhang, D. 2012. The construct of adaptive behaviour: Its conceptualization, measurement, and use in the field of intellectual disability. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental disabilities, 117(4), 291–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The British Psychological Society (BPS). 2001. Learning disability: Definitions and contexts. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Vijver, F. J. R. and Hambleton, R. K. 1996. Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Vijver, F. J. R. and Leung, K. 1997. Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In: J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga and J. Pandey, eds., Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 257–300.
   Google Scholar
• VandenBos, G. R. 2006. APA dictionary of psychology. New York, NY: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y., Oakland, T. and Algina, J. 2008. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis for the parent form, ages 5–21, of the Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System-II. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 178–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar