1,917
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Review of assistive technology in the training of children with autism spectrum disorders

&
Pages 73-85 | Received 24 Sep 2019, Accepted 11 Dec 2019, Published online: 20 Jan 2020

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Amran, N.A.B., Gunasekaran, S.S. and Mahmoud, M.A. 2018. Investigating the factors that influence the efficiency of using robots as social skills therapy for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10, 1779–1792. doi:https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v10i6s.142
  • Anzalone, S.M., et al., 2014. How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4dimensional (spatial 3D + time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 814–826.
  • Bekele, E., et al., 2014. Pilot clinical application of an adaptive robotic system for young children with autism. Autism, 18, 598–608.
  • Bekele, E.T., et al., 2013. A step towards developing adaptive robot-mediated intervention architecture (ARIA) for children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 21, 289–299.
  • Bugnariu, N., et al., 2013. Human-robot interaction as a tool to evaluate and quantify motor imitation behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, ICVR 2013, 57–62.
  • Cabibihan, J.J., Javed, H., Ang, M. and Aljunied, S.M. 2013. Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 593–618.
  • Cho, S.J. and Ahn, D.H. 2016. Socially assistive robotics in autism spectrum disorder. Hanyang Medical Reviews, 36, 17.
  • Coeckelbergh, M., et al., 2016. A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: Ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 47–65.
  • Conti, D., et al., 2015. Use of robotics to stimulate imitation in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a pilot study in a clinical setting. 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).
  • Costa, S., et al., 2015. Using a humanoid robot to elicit body awareness and appropriate physical interaction in children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 265–278.
  • Costa, S., et al., 2013. “Where is your nose?” - Developing body awareness skills among children with autism using a humanoid robot. ACHI 2013, The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, (January 2016), 117–122. Available from: www.researchgate.net/publication/235350482.
  • CSESA Technology Group. 2013. Definition of technology for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Chapel Hill, NC: Center on Secondary Education for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
  • David, D.O., et al., 2018. Developing joint attention for children with autism in robot-enhanced therapy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10, 595–605.
  • Feil-Seifer, D. and Mataric, M. 2011. Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features, 323.
  • Feil-Seifer, D. and Matariae, M. 2009. Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Experimental Robotics - Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 54, 201–210–210.
  • Francis, K. 2005. Autism interventions: a critical update. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 493–499.
  • Grossard, C., et al., 2018. ICT and autism care: state of the art. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 31, 474–483.
  • Hanafiah, F.A., et al., 2012. Initial response in HRI-a case study on evaluation of child with autism spectrum disorders interacting with a humanoid robot NAO. Procedia Engineering, 41, 1448–1455.
  • Huskens, B., et al., 2013. Promoting question-asking in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders: effectiveness of a robot intervention compared to a human-trainer intervention. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 16, 345–356.
  • Ismail, L. I., Verhoeven, T., Dambre, J. and Wyffels, F. 2019. Leveraging robotics research for children with autism: a review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11, 389–410.
  • Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J. and Antes, G. 2003. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 118–121.
  • Kim, E.S., et al., 2013. Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1038–1049.
  • Kim, E., Paul, R., Shic, F. and Scassellati, B. 2012. Bridging the research gap: making HRI useful to individuals with autism. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1, 26–54.
  • Kitchenham, B. 2004. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. UK and National ICT Australia: Keele University, 33, 28. doi:10.1.1.122.3308.
  • Landauer, T. K. 1986. Psychology as a mother of invention. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 17, 333–335.
  • Mazzei, D., et al., 2010. The FACE of autism. Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 791–796.
  • Mataric, M. 2014. Socially assistive robotics: human-robot interaction methods for creating robots that care. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’14, 333–333.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D. G. 2010. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8, 336–341.
  • Moro, C., Lin, S., Nejat, G. and Mihailidis, A. 2018. Social robots and seniors: a comparative study on the influence of dynamic social features on human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11, 5–24.
  • Ouss, L., et al., 2014. Infant's engagement and emotion as predictors of autism or intellectual disability in West syndrome. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 23, 143–149.
  • Pennisi, P., et al., 2016. Autism and social robotics: a systematic review. Autism Research, 9, 165–183.
  • Pop, C.A., Pintea, S., Vanderborght, B. and David, D.O. 2014. Enhancing play skills, engagement and social skills in a play task in ASD children by using robot-based interventions. A pilot study. Interaction Studies Interaction Studies, 15, 292–320.
  • Quill, A.K. 1995. Teaching children with autism: strategies to enhance communication and socialization. USA: Delmar Publishers Inc.
  • Ricks, D.J. and Colton, M.B. 2010. Trends and considerations in robot-assisted autism therapy. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) International Conference, 4354–4359.
  • Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R. and Billard, A. 2005. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 105–120.
  • Salvador, M.J., Silver, S. and Mahoor, M.H. 2015. An emotion recognition comparative study of autistic and typically-developing children using the zeno robot. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2015 June, 6128–6133.
  • Scassellati, B., et al., 2018. Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Science Robotics, 3, eaat7544.
  • Scassellati, B., Admoni, H. and Mataric, M. 2012. Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 275–294.
  • Scassellati, B. 2007. How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and understand autism. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics Robotics Research, 28, 552–563.
  • Scassellati, B. 2005. Quantitative metrics of social response for autism diagnosis. IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), 585–590.
  • Senju, A. 2013. Atypical development of spontaneous social cognition in autism spectrum disorders. Brain and Development, 35, 96–101.
  • Severson, R.L., et al., 2008. Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism, 271.
  • Simut, R.E., et al., 2016. Children with autism spectrum disorders make a fruit salad with probo, the social robot: an interaction study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 113–126.
  • So, W.-C., et al., 2018. Robot-based intervention may reduce delay in the production of intransitive gestures in Chinese-speaking preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Molecular Autism, 9, 1–16.
  • Tapus, A., et al., 2012. Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: A series of single case experiments. Interaction Studies, 13, 315–347.
  • Wainer, J., Robins, B., Amirabdollahian, F. and Dautenhahn, K. 2014. Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 6, 183–199.
  • Wainer, J., Ferrari, E., Dautenhahn, K. and Robins, B. 2010. The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 445–455.
  • Warren, Z.E., et al., 2013. Can robotic interaction improve joint attention skills? Journal of Autism Development Disorder, 45(11), 3726-3734.
  • WHO. 2001. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Wilson, J. and Rosenberg, D. 1988. Rapid prototyping for user interface design. In: M. Helander ed. Handbook of human-computer interaction. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 859–875.
  • Yun, S.S., et al., 2017. Social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder using a robotic behavioral intervention system. Autism Research, 10, 1306–1323.
  • Yussof, H., et al., 2013. Study on social interaction between children with autism and humanoid robot NAO. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 393, 573–578. www.scientific.net/amm.393.573.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.