377
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Teacher-student interaction in a special school for students with developmental disabilities in Chinese context

, , , &
Pages 168-181 | Received 17 Sep 2019, Accepted 04 Feb 2020, Published online: 03 Mar 2020

References

  • Agran, M., Alper, S. and Wehmeyer, M. 2002. Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 37, 123–133.
  • Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B. and Pianta, R. 2013. Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. School Psychology Review, 42, 76–98.
  • Alves, A. J. and Gottlieb, J. 1986. Teacher interactions with mainstreamed handicapped students and their nonhandicapped peers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 77–83.
  • Artiles, A. J., Harris-Murri, N. and Rostenberg, D. 2006. Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory into Practice, 45, 260–268.
  • Avramidis, E. and Norwich, B. 2002. Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 129–147.
  • Barron, B. 2007. Video as a tool to advance understanding of learning and development in peer, family, and other informal learning contexts. In: R. Goldman, R. D. Pea, B. Barron and S. Derry, eds. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.159–87.
  • Birch, S. H. and Ladd, G. W. 1997. The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 61–79.
  • Black, S. 2001. Ask me a question: How teachers use inquiry in a classroom. The American School Board Journal, 188, 43–45.
  • Brophy, J. E. and Good, T. L. 1970. Teachers’ communication of differential expectations for children’s classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365–374.
  • Brophy, J., and Evertson, C. 1976. Learning from teaching: a developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 
  • Brown, H. D. 2014. Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquistion. London: Pearson Education.
  • Buyse, E., Verschueren, K., Doumen, S., Van Damme, J. and Maes, F. 2008. Classroom problem behavior and teacher-child relationships in kindergarten: The moderating role of classroom climate. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 367–391.
  • Cadima, J., Leal, T. and Burchinal, M. 2010. The quality of teacher–student interactions: Associations with first graders’ academic and behavioral outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 457–482.
  • Cameron, D. L. 2014. An examination of teacher–student interactions in inclusive classrooms: Teacher interviews and classroom observations. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 14, 264–273.
  • Campbell, J. R. and Barnes, C. W. 1969. Interaction analysis: A breakthrough? The Phi Delta Kappan, 50, 587–590.
  • Carter, E. W., Owens, L., Trainor, A. A., Sun, Y. and Swedeen, B. 2009. Self-determination skills and opportunities of adolescents with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 179–192.
  • Caspi, A., Elder, G. H. and Bem, D. J. 1987. Moving against the world: Life-course patterns of explosive children. Developmental Psychology, 23, 308–313.
  • Chapman, R. B., Larsen, S. C. and Parker, R. M. 1979. Interactions of first-grade teachers with learning disordered children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 20–25.
  • Chen, J. G. 2019. Basic characteristics and implementing strategies of mathematics vitality classroom in secondary vocational schools. China’s Vocational and Technical Education, 10–14.
  • Chen, Y. 1996. Making special education compulsory and inclusive in China. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 47–58.
  • Cheung, R. H. P. 2012. Teaching for creativity: Examining the beliefs of early childhood teachers and their influence on teaching practices. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37, 43–51.
  • Cheung, R. H. P. 2017. Teacher-directed versus child-centred: The challenge of promoting creativity in Chinese preschool classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25, 73–86.
  • Collier, M. 2001. Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology. In: T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt, eds. The handbook of visual analysis. London: SAGE, pp.35–60.
  • Connor, C. M., Son, S. H., Hindman, A. H. and Morrison, F. J. 2005. Teacher qualifications, classroom practices, family characteristics, and preschool experience: Complex effects on first graders’ vocabulary and early reading outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 343–375.
  • Cook, B. G. 2001. A Comparison of Teachers' Attitudes Toward Their Included Students with Mild and Severe Disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 203–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690103400403.
  • Cook, B. G. and Cameron, D. L. 2010. Inclusive teachers’ concern and rejection toward their students: Investigating the validity of ratings and comparing student groups. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 67–76.
  • Cooper, H. M. 1979. Pygmalion grows up: A model for teacher expectation communication and performance influence. Review of Educational Research, 49, 389–410.
  • Cooper, J. and Irizarry, J. 2014. Classroom teaching skills. 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Dembo, M. H., Yoshida, R., Reilly, T. and Reilly, V. 1978. Teacher student interaction in special education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 49, 212–213.
  • Deng, M. and Poon-McBrayer, K. F. 2004. Inclusive education in China: Conceptualisation and realisation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 24, 143–156.
  • Deng, M. and Zhu, X. 2016. Special education reform towards inclusive education: Blurring or expanding boundaries of special and regular education in China. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16, 994–998.
  • Deng, M., Poon-McBrayer, K. F. and Farnsworth, E. B. 2001. The development of special education in China: A sociocultural review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 288–298.
  • Deutsch, C., Dube, W. and McIlvane, W. 2008. Attention deficits, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and intellectual disabilities. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 14, 285–292.
  • Ding, Y. 2007. Inclusive education: The developmental tendency, meaning, and enlightenment of contemporary education. Studies in Foreign Education, 34, 22–26.
  • Dole, S., Bloom, L. and Kowalske, K. 2016. Transforming pedagogy: Changing perspectives from teacher-centered to learner-centered. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10, 1.
  • Downer, J., Sabol, T. J. and Hamre, B. 2010. Teacher-child interactions in the classroom: Toward a theory of within-and cross-domain links to children’s developmental outcomes. Early Education & Development, 21, 699–723.
  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D. and Schellinger, K. B. 2011. The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
  • Ellsworth, N. J. and Zhang, C. 2007. Progress and challenges in China’s special education development: Observations, reflections, and recommendations. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 58–64.
  • Empson, S. B. 2003. Low-performing students and teaching fractions for understanding: An interactional analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 305–343.
  • Englehart, J. M. 2009. Teacher–student interaction. In: L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin, eds. International handbook of research on teachers and teaching. Boston, MA: Springer, pp.711–722.
  • Erickson, F. 1986. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock, ed. Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan, pp.119–161.
  • Evertson, C. and Emmer, E. 1982. Preventive classroom management. In D. Duke, ed. Helping teachers manage classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, pp.2–31.
  • Fang, H. G., Gao, C. Z. and Chen, J. 2012. Improved flanders interactive analysis system and its application. Chinese Electrification Education, 33, 109–113.
  • Fantuzzo, J. W., Gadsden, V. L. and McDermott, P. A. 2011. An integrated curriculum to improve mathematics, language, and literacy for head start children. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 763–793.
  • Fink, A. H. 1972. Teacher-pupil interaction in classes for the emotionally handicapped. Exceptional Children, 38, 469–474.
  • Flanders, N. A. 1963. Intent, action and feedback: A preparation for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 14, 251–260.
  • Flanders, N. 1970. Analysing teacher behaviour. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Flanders, N. A. and Simon, A. 1969. Teacher effectiveness. Classroom Interaction Newsletter, 5, 18–37.
  • Freiberg, H. J. 1981. Three decades of the Flanders interaction analysis system. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 16, 1–7.
  • Fu, W. Q., Mo, L. L., and Xiao, F. 2016. From “knowledge learning” to “full life” – the change of the value orientation of curriculum reform in special schools for children with developmental disabilities in China. Chinese Journal of special education, 23, 32–37.
  • Gall, M. 1984. Synthesis of research on teachers’ questioning. Educational Leadership, 42, 40–47.
  • Gao, W. 2007. Interactive analysis of speech ACTS between teachers and students in classroom teaching.
  • Gehlbach, H., Brinkworth, M. E., King, A. M., Hsu, L. M., McIntyre, J. and Rogers, T. 2016. Creating birds of similar feathers: Leveraging similarity to improve teacher–student relationships and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 342–352.
  • General Office of the State Council of China. 2014. Plan for upgrading the level of special education (2014–2016). Available at <http://www.gov.cn/xxgk/pub/govpublic/mrlm/201401/t20140118_66612.html>[accessed 20 November 2019] .
  • Gest, S. D. 1997. Behavioral inhibition: Stability and associations with adaptation from childhood to early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 467–475.
  • Good, T. L. 1970. Which pupils do teachers call on? The Elementary School Journal, 70, 190–198.
  • Goronga, P. 2013. The nature and quality of classroom verbal interaction: Implications for primary school teachers in Zimbabwe. Academic Research International, 4, 431–444.
  • Granic, I. and Patterson, G. R. 2006. Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113, 101–131.
  • Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H. and Pianta, R. C. 2015. Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System-Secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 651–680.
  • Hagenauer, G. and Volet, S. E. 2014. Teacher–student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 370–388.
  • Hamre, B. K. and Pianta, R. C. 2005. Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?. Child Development, 76, 949–967.
  • Harris, D. 1982. Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders, 2, 21–37.
  • Harrop, A. and Swinson, J. 2003. Teachers' Questions in the Infant, Junior and Secondary School. Educational Studies, 29, 49–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690303265.
  • He, J. D. 2009. The survival education of mental retarded children: A case study of curriculum development. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 16, 51–56.
  • Hieneman, M., Dunlap, G. and Kincaid, D. 2005. Positive support strategies for students with behavioral disorders in general education settings. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 779–794.
  • Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R. L., Carr, E. G. and Al, E. 1990. Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioral support. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 125–132.
  • Huang, Z. H. 2017. An empirical study on teachers and students’ classroom interactive speech act for Chinese class in deaf schools. Master’s thesis. Available from China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database.
  • Hughes, J. N. and Im, M. H. 2016. Teacher–student relationship and peer disliking and liking across grades 1–4. Child Development, 87, 593–611.
  • Jacobs, J. K., Kawanaka, T. and Stigler, J. W. 1999. Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 717–724.
  • Jarrold, C., Baddeley, A. D. and Phillips, C. 1999. Down syndrome and the phonological loop: The evidence for, and importance of, a specific verbal short-term memory deficit. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 6, 61–75.
  • Jennings, P. A. and Greenberg, M. T. 2009. The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491–525.
  • Jones, R. L. 1972. Labels and stigma in special education. Exceptional Children, 38, 553–564.
  • Jordan, A. and Stanovich, P. 2001. Patterns of teacher-student interaction in inclusive elementary classrooms and correlates with student self-concept. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48, 33–52.
  • Jordan, A., Lindsay, L. and Stanovich, P. J. 1997. Classroom teachers’ instructional interactions with students who are exceptional, at risk, and typically achieving. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 82–93.
  • Jussim, L. and Harber, K. D. 2005. Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 131–155.
  • Kawanaka, T. and Stigler, J. 1999. Teachers’ use of questions in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 255–278.
  • Kemp, C. and Carter, M. 2002. The social skills and social status of mainstreamed students with intellectual disabilities. Educational Psychology, 22, 391–411.
  • Korkmaz, O. and Yesil, R. 2010. A comparison of different teaching applications based on questioning in terms of their effects upon pre-service teachers’ good questioning skills. (Report). College Student Journal, 44, 1006.
  • Kurt, O. and Tekin-Iftar, E. 2008. A comparison of constant time delay and simultaneous prompting within embedded instruction on teaching leisure skills to children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 53–64.
  • Li, P. 2015. A study on high school biology teacher’s classroom teaching behavior which take show and tell in central south area’s teaching seminars in 2013 for instance. Master’s thesis. Available from China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database.
  • Li, S. 2014. A study on teacher-student interaction in classroom of mentally retarded schools which take the Rixin school in Dalian as an example. Master’s thesis. Available from China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database.
  • Li, X. J., Sun, Y. and Jia, K. R. 2010. Reflections on the problems arising in the practice of the package-shift mode in schools for the mentally retarded. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 17, 48–52.
  • Li, X. Q. 2015. Research on the cultivation of interactive relationship between teachers and students in schools for intelligence disability. Basic Education Research, 28, 34–35.
  • Liu, B., Liu, H., Zhang, H. and Qin, X. 2018. A social force evacuation model driven by video data. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 84, 190–203.
  • Loepp, F. L. 1999. Models of curriculum integration. The Journal of Technology Studies, 25, 21–25.
  • Lonning, R. A., DeFranco, T. C. and Weinland, T. P. 1998. Development of theme-based, interdisciplinary, integrated curriculum: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 312–319.
  • Lyon, H. C., Holzer, M., Reincke, M., Brendel, T., Ring, J., Weindl, A., Zottmann, J. M. and Fischer, M. R. 2014. Improvements in teaching behavior at two German medical schools resulting from a modified Flanders interaction analysis feedback intervention process. Medical Teacher, 36, 903–911.
  • Madden, N. A. and Slavin, R. E. 1983. Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53, 519–569.
  • Makdissi, M. and Davis, G. 2016. Using video analysis for concussion surveillance in Australian football. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19, 958–963.
  • Martin, D. and Cuban, L. 2005. Teaching for historical thinking: Teacher conceptions, practices, and constraints. ProQuest dissertations and theses.
  • Matsumura, L. C., Slater, S. C. and Crosson, A. 2008. Classroom climate, rigorous instruction and curriculum, and students’ interactions in urban middle schools. The Elementary School Journal, 108, 293–312.
  • McDuffie, K., Mastropieri, M. and Scruggs, T. 2009. Differential effects of peer tutoring in co-taught and non-co-taught classes: Results for content learning and student-teacher interactions. Exceptional Children, 75, 493–510.
  • McFarland, L., Murray, E. and Phillipson, S. 2016. Student–teacher relationships and student self-concept: Relations with teacher and student gender. Australian Journal of Education, 60, 5–25.
  • McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Haager, D. and Lee, O. 1993. Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249–261.
  • Mcloughlin, C. S., Zhou, Z. and Clark, E. 2005. Reflections on the development and status of contemporary special education services in China. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 273–283.
  • Mejia, T. M. and Hoglund, W. L. 2016. Do children’s adjustment problems contribute to teacher–child relationship quality? Support for a child-driven model. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 34, 13–26.
  • Mesibov, G. B., Browder, D. M. and Kirkland, C. 2002. Using individualized schedules as a component of positive behavioral support for students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 73–79.
  • Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China. 2017. Second plan for upgrading the level of special education (2017–2020). Available at <http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3331/201707/t20170720_309687.html>[accessed 23 November 2019].
  • Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China. 2018. The major statistics of the national education development in 2018. Available at <http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/201807/t20180719_343508.html> [accessed 17 December 2019].
  • Morris, K. R. and Horner, R. H. 2009. Positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 4, 97–105.
  • Nelson, J. and Roberts, M. 2000. Ongoing reciprocal teacher-student interactions involving disruptive behaviors in general education classrooms. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 27–37.
  • Nugent, P. M. and Mosley, J. L. 1987. Mentally retarded and nonretarded individuals’ attention allocation and capacity. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 91, 598–605.
  • Nugent, T. T. 2009. The impact of teacher-student interaction on student motivation and achievement. Doctoral dissertation. University of Central Florida, America. Available at <http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0002884/Nugent_Tisome_T_200912_EdD.pdf>.
  • Nurmasitah, S. 2010. A study of classroom interaction characteristics in a geography class conducted in English: The case at year ten of an immersion class in SMA N 2 Semarang. Master’s thesis. Diponegoro University, Indonesia. Available at <https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11722762.pdf>.
  • Opdenakker, M. C. and Damme, J. V. 2006. Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1–21.
  • Pennings, H. J., Brekelmans, M., Sadler, P., Claessens, L. C., van der Want, A. C. and van Tartwijk, J. 2018. Interpersonal adaptation in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 55, 41–57.
  • Perry, K. E., Donohue, K. M. and Weinstein, R. S. 2007. Teaching practices and the promotion of achievement and adjustment in first grade. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 269–292.
  • Rich, H. L. and Ross, S. M. 1989. Students’ time on learning tasks in special education. Exceptional Children, 55, 508–515.
  • Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Curby, T. W., Grimm, K. J., Nathanson, L. and Brock, L. L. 2009. The contribution of children’s self-regulation and classroom quality to children’s adaptive behaviors in the kindergarten classroom. Developmental Psychology, 45, 958–972.
  • Ruhleder, K. and Jordan, B. 1997. Capturing complex, distributed activities: Video-based interaction analysis as a component of workplace ethnography. In: A. S. Lee, J. Liebeneau and J. I. DeGross, eds., Information systems and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Springer, pp.246–275.
  • Ryan, A. M. and Patrick, H. 2001. The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437–460.
  • Salvia, J., Clark, G. M. and Ysseldyke, J. E. 1973. Teacher retention of stereotypes of exceptionality. Exceptional Children, 39, 651–652.
  • Schulte, A. C., Osborne, S. S. and McKinney, J. D. 1990. Academic outcomes for students with learning disabilities in consultation and resource programs. Exceptional Children, 57, 162–172.
  • Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M. and Schwindt, K. 2011. Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 259–267.
  • Shao, P. 2016. Research on student’s classroom social interaction performance in schools for mentally retarded students. Master’s thesis. Available from China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database.
  • Shogren, K. A., Garnier Villarreal, M., Dowsett, C. and Little, T. D. 2016. Exploring student, family, and school predictors of self-determination using NLTS2 data. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39, 23–33.
  • Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Rifenbark, G. G. and Little, T. D. 2015. Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 256–267.
  • Shores, R. E., Jack, S. L., Gunter, P. L., Ellis, D. N., DeBriere, T. J. and Wehby, J. H. 1993. Classroom interactions of children with behavior disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 27–39.
  • Slavin, R. E., Lake, C. and Groff, C. 2009. Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 839–911.
  • Spooner, F., Knight, V. F., Browder, D. M. and Smith, B. R. 2012. Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 374–387.
  • Stage, S. A. and Quiroz, D. R. 1997. A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.
  • Stanovich, K. E. 1978. Information processing in mentally retarded individuals. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 9, 29–60.
  • Stigler, J. W. and Hiebert, J. 2000. The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 867–874.
  • Stigler, J. W., Gallimore, R. and Hiebert, J. 2000. Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies. Educational Psychologist, 35, 87–100.
  • Sun, Y. 2004. The practices of subject-integrated curriculum in schools for mentally retarded children. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 11, 33–38.
  • Sutherland, K. S. 2000. Promoting positive interactions between teachers and students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 44, 110–115.
  • Sutherland, K. S., Lewis-Palmer, T., Stichter, J. and Morgan, P. L. 2008. Examining the influence of teacher behavior and classroom context on the behavioral and academic outcomes for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 223–233.
  • Thompson, R. H., White, K. R. and Morgan, D. P. 1982. Teacher–student interaction patterns in classrooms with mainstreamed mildly handicapped students. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 220–236.
  • Van Ewijk, R. 2011. Same work, lower grade? Student ethnicity and teachers’ subjective assessments. Economics of Education Review, 30, 1045–1058.
  • Walberg, H. J., and Wang, M. C. 1987. Effective educational practices and provisions for individual differences. In: M.C. Wang, M.C. Reynold, & H.J. Walberg, Eds., Handbook of special education: Research and practice (vol. 1, pp. 113-128). Oxford: Pergamon. 
  • Waldron, N. L. and McLeskey, J. 1998. The effects of an inclusive school program on students with mild and severe learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 395–405.
  • Wallace, M. A., Cox, E. A. and Skinner, C. H. 2003. Increasing independent seatwork: Breaking large assignments into smaller assignments and teaching a student with retardation to recruit reinforcement. School Psychology Review, 32, 132–142.
  • Wang, X. M. 2017. Research on the current situation of speech interaction between teachers and students in primary mathematics classroom—Based on improved Flanders Interactive Analysis System(iFIAS). Master’s thesis. Available from China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database.
  • Wang, Y. and Mu, G. M. 2014. Revisiting the trajectories of special teacher education in China through policy and practice. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61, 346–361.
  • Wehmeyer, M. 1997. Self-determination as an educational outcome: A definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 175–209.
  • Wen, X. and Cui, Y. D. 2016. Research on learning-plan-based classroom interaction: An improvement and application of Flanders Interaction Analysis System. Research in Educational Development, 36, 62–68.
  • Wu, T. Y. 2017. A study on teacher-student interaction in speical education school. Master’s thesis. East China Normal University, Shanghai.
  • Wu, X. P., Zhang, Y. and Peng, N. X. 2016. Research on classroom teaching evaluation based on FIAS and PPE theories. e-Education Research, 37, 93–99.
  • Xiao, F., Liu, Q. L. and Qian, Z. L. 2007. Research on the localization of special education – probing into the academic thoughts of professor Piao Yongxin. Journal of the National Institute of Education Administration, 9, 3–10.
  • Xue, L. 2015. An iFIAS-based study on teacher-students interaction in small classes of English listening and speaking in junior middle schools. Master’s thesis. Available from China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database.
  • Yang, H. and Wang, H. 1994. Special education in China. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 93–105.
  • Yell, M. L. 1995. Least restrictive environment, inclusion, and students with disabilities: A legal analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 389–404.
  • Yu, L. Y. 2016. Practice and reflection of integrated theme teaching in school for intellectual disabilities. Modern Special Education, 25, 49–53.
  • Zhao, C. L. 2010. Investigation on the current situation of teacher-student interaction in primary school classrooms in China—Take the case of F primary school as an example. Contemporary Education Sciences, 25, 48–50.
  • Zhou, Q. M., Zhu, Z. S. and Zhang, X. Y. 2016. Consummating the support system and improving the quality of special education: An analysis of the progress in the work of the national special education reform experimental areas. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 23, 25–30.
  • Zhu, H., Guo, Q., Liu, F., Lei, J. H. and Zhu, N. 2018. A case study of speech act interaction between teachers and students in mathematics classroom of blind school based on an improved Flanders Interactive Analysis System (iFIAS). Chinese Journal of Special Education, 25, 41–47.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.