Teachers’ use of assistive technology in Saudi special education schools: A mixed-methods enquiry

References

• Ajuwon, P. M. and Chitiyo, G. 2016. Survey of the use of assistive technology in schools in Nigeria. The Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 16, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Alfaraj, A. and Kuyini, A. 2014. The use of technology to support the learning of children with Down syndrome in Saudi Arabia. World Journal of Education, 4, 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Alharbi, S. A. 2018. Special education teachers' knowledge and use of assistive technology for inclusive classrooms in Saudi Arabia. PhD. Saint Louis University.
   Google Scholar
• Alkahtani, K. D. 2013. Teachers’ knowledge and use of assistive technology for students with special educational needs. Journal of Studies in Education, 3, 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Almalki, N. and Al-Harthi, B.M. 2020. The importance of using assistive technology with students with intellectual disabilities in inclusive education schools. International Journal for Research in Education, 44, 265–298.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Moghyrah, H. 2017. Assistive technology use for students with Down syndrome at mainstream schools in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Education and Practice, 8, 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Alsolmi, A. 2017. Teachers of students with visual disability: Their perceptions and knowledge of assistive technology in Saudi Arabia. PhD. Saint Louis University.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D., Jones, P., McGhie-Richmond, D., Riley, M., May-Poole, S., Orlando, A. M., Simsek, O. and Wilcox, C. 2018. An exploration of teacher's use of iPads for students with learning support needs. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 18, 73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check, J. and Schutt, R. K. 2011. Research methods in education. 55 City Road, London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chukwuemeka, E. J. and Dominic, S. 2020. Teachers' perception and factors limiting the use of high-tech assistive technology in special education schools in north-west Nigeria. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11, 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, V. L. P. and Creswell, J. W. 2008. The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinescu, C. 2015. Assistive technology use among secondary special education teachers in private schools for students with specific learning disabilities: Types, level of use and reported barriers. PhD. University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2015. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, S., Bouck, E. C. and Richardson, J. 2013. Middle school special education teachers' perceptions and use of assistive technology in literacy instruction. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of Resna, 25, 24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Business Machines (IBM). 1991. Technology and persons with disabilities. Atlanta, GA: IBM Corporate Support Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W. and Stick, S. L. 2006. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18, 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D. L. 2012. Assistive technology for students with disabilities: Resources and challenges encountered by teachers. PhD. University of Northern Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Churilla, I., Demes, A., Sadlo, R., Sweeney, M. and Pastore, H. 2015. Finding Ferdy: A collaborative inquiry about a student with complex disabilities. The Canadian Journal for Teacher Research, 3
   Google Scholar
• Jones, V. L. and Hinesmon-Matthews, L. J. 2014. Effective assistive technology consideration and implications for diverse students. Computers in the Schools, 31, 220–232.
   Google Scholar
• Khanlou, N., Khan, A., Vazquez, L. M. and Zangeneh, M. 2020. Digital literacy, access to technology and inclusion for young adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09738-w
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G.E. 2017. Assistive technology for people with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 187–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G.E. and Singh, N.N. eds. 2014. Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G.E., Singh, N.N., O’Reilly, M.F., Sigafoos, J., Boccasini, A., Perilli, V. and Spagnuolo, C. 2017. Persons with multiple disabilities manage positive leisure and communication engagement through a technology-aided program. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D'Amico, F., Vincenti, A., Buonocunto, F., Susco, V., Lanzilotti, C. and Navarro, J. 2019. Basic smartphone-aided communication and leisure for people with extensive neuro-motor impairment and absence of speech. NeuroRehabilitation, 45, 311–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G., Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M. F. and Singh, N. N. 2012. Assistive technology: Interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nordström, T., Nilsson, S., Gustafson, S. and Svensson, I. 2019. Assistive technology applications for students with reading difficulties: Special education teachers' experiences and perceptions. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 14, 798–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative evaluation and research methods: Integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, C., Miglino, O., Alberti, G., Perilli, V. and Lancioni, G.E. 2017. Speech generating technology to support request responses of persons with intellectual and multiple disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 238–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasolla, F., Caffò, A.O., Damiani, R., Perilli, V., Di Leone, A. and Albano, V. 2015. Assistive technology-based programs to promote communication and leisure activities by three children emerged from a minimal conscious state. Cognitive Processing, 16, 69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasolla, F., Caffò, A.O., Perilli, V., Boccasini, A., Damiani, R. and D'Amico, F. 2019. Assistive technology for promoting adaptive skills of children with cerebral palsy: Ten cases evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 14, 489–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syriopoulou-Delli, C. K. and Gkiolnta, E. 2020. Review of assistive technology in the training of children with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 66, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2017. Global priority research agenda for improving access to high-quality affordable assistive technology. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala, J. 1995. The SETT Framework: Critical areas to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions. [online] <http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED381962&site=eds-live.> [Accessed: 14 April 2019].
   Google Scholar