Teaching expository writing to Arabic-speaking students with intellectual disability in inclusive classrooms: effect of four-square method and sentence frames

References

• Alber-Morgan, S. R., Hessler, T. and Konrad, M. 2007. Teaching writing for keeps. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 107–128.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, A. M., Higbee, T. S., Kelley, K. N., Sellers, T. P. and Pollard, J. S. 2011. Increasing response variability of mand frames with script training and extinction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 357–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, N. C. 2020. Evaluating the efficacy of using sentence frames for learning new vocabulary in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57, 454–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunn, M. 2002. The four-square strategy. The Reading Teacher, 55, 522–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, Y.N., Schumaker, J.B. and Deshler, D. D. 2006. The effects of a strategic writing program for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive fifth-grade classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 244–260.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella-Malone, H. I., Konrad, M. and Pennington, R. C. 2015. ACCESS! Teaching writing skills to students with intellectual disability. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47, 272–280.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. The effect size: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Dutro, S. and Kinsella, K. 2010. English language development: Issues and implementation at grades six through twelve. In: D. Dolson and L. Burnham-Massey, eds. Improving education for English learners. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Emam, M. M. and Mohamed, A. H. H. 2011. Preschool and primary school teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Egypt: The role of experience and self-efficacy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 976–985.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., Okolo, C. M., Shankland, R. K., Moxley, K. D., Courtad, C. A., Jocks-Meier, B. S., O'Brien, J. C., Martin, N. M. and Chen, H.-Y. 2009. The learning-to-learn strategies of adolescent students with disabilities: Highlighting, note taking, planning, and writing expository texts. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Espin, C., Shin, J., Deno, S. L., Skare, S., Robinson, S. and Benner, B. 2000. Identifying indicators of growth in written expression proficiency for middle school students. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 140–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, N. and Fisher, D. 2011. Structuring the talk: Ensuring academic talk matters. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84, 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoneim, S. 2014. Requirements for inclusion of children with disabilities in public education in Egypt. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4, 192–199.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. and Gould, E. J. 1999. Four square: Writing method for grades 1–3. Lancaster, England: Lorenz Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. and Gould, E. J. 2004. Four square: Writing in the content areas for grades 5-9. Lancaster, England: Lorenz Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J., Gould, E. J. and Burke, M. F. 2010a. Four square: Writing method grades 4-6: A unique approach to teaching basic writing skills. Lancaster, England: Teaching and Learning Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J., Gould, E. J. and Burke, M. F. 2010b. Four square: Writing method grades 7-9: A unique approach to teaching basic writing skills. Lancaster, England: Teaching and Learning Company.
   Google Scholar
• Guzel-Ozmen, R. 2006. The effectiveness of modified cognitive strategy instruction in writing with mildly mentally retarded Turkish students. Exceptional Children, 72, 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallenbeck, M. J. 2002. Taking charge: Adolescents with learning disabilities assume responsibility for their own writing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Mills, S. and Apel, K. 2013. Narrative and expository writing of adolescents with language-learning disabilities: A pilot study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34, 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanein, E., E. A., Adawi, T. R. and Johnson, E., S. 2021. Barriers to including children with disabilities in Egyptian schools. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 24, 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick, W. B., Katims, D. S. and Carr, N. J. 1999. Implementing a multimethod, multilevel literacy program for students with mental retardation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 231–239.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M. and Konrad, M. 2009. Teaching students with intellectual or developmental disabilities to write: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, M., Trela, K. and Test, D. W. 2006. Using IEP goals and objectives to teach paragraph writing to high school students with physical and cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A. D. and Petersen, V. 2017. Written cohesion in children with and without language learning disabilities. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52, 612–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. and Hulstijn, J. 2001. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied linguistics, 22, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malika, L. 1998. Stanford-Binnet test of intelligence:IV. Cairo, Egypt: Victor Kirlis Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, E. and Torgerson, C. J. 2012. Single group, pre-and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 583–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. J. and Mkhize, D. 2013. Teachers’ orientations towards writing. Journal of Writing Research, 5, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• McMackin, M. C. and Witherell, N. L. 2005. Different routes to the same destination: Drawing conclusions with tiered graphic organizers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 242–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mims, P. J., Stanger, C., Pennington, R., White, W., Sears, J. and Strickler, N. 2017. Opinion paragraph writing intervention for students with significant disability. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 11, 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2014. National strategic plan for pre-university education in Egypt (2014–2030) Education Egypt National Project. Retrieved from UNESCO website. <https://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/planipolis/files/ressources/egypt%20efa%20plan.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Nurulita, A. 2014. Improving Students' Writing Skill In Recount Text Using Four Squares Writing Method (A Classroom Action Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Negeri 23 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2014/2015). Surakarta: Universitas Slamet Riyadi.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Hartt, J. and Samols, D. 2005. Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18, 657–686.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, R., Delano, M. and Scott, R. 2014. Improving cover‐letter writing skills of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 204–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, R., Flick, A. and Smith-Wehr, K. 2018. The use of response prompting and frames for teaching sentence writing to students with moderate intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33, 142–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, R. and Koehler, M. 2017. Effects of modeling, story templates, and self-graphing in the use of story elements by students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, L. M., Thompson, J., L., Ganz, J. B., Wattanawongwan, S., Haas, A. N. and Yllades, V. 2021. Coaching parents of children with developmental disabilities to implement a modified dialogic reading intervention using low technology via telepractice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30, 119–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. R., Martin, G. E., Chen, K. and Jones, J. R. 2020. A preliminary study of writing skills in adolescents with autism across persuasive, expository, and narrative genres. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 319–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., Lombardino, L. J. and Altmann, L. J. 2006. Writing through retellings: An exploratory study of language-impaired and dyslexic populations. Reading and Writing, 20, 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purrazzella, K. and Mechling, L. 2013. Evaluation of manual spelling, observational and incidental learning using computer-based instruction with a tablet PC, large screen projection, and a forward chaining procedure. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 218–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, P. 2019. The significance of writing skills in the ELL environment. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, R., Lienemann, T. O. and Hagaman, J. L. 2013. Strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichardt, C. S. 2009. Quasi-experimental design. The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 46, 490–500.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. J. and Noordman, L. G. 2000. The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29, 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C., Poblete, M. and de Blume, A. P. G. 2018. Exploring the meta-comprehension abilities of students with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 33, 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A. 2001. How the special needs brain learns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. 2002. Evaluation of social work practice in the new millennium: Myths and realities. In: D. T. L. Shek, M. C. Lam, C. F. Au, and J. J. Lee, eds. Entering a new millennium: Advances in social welfare service and research. Hong Kong: New Asia College and the Chinese University Press, pp.3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tretter, T., Ardasheva, Y. and Bookstrom, E. 2014. A brick and mortar approach. The Science Teacher, 081, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R., Pearman, C., Hail, C. and Hurst, B. 2007. Writing for comprehension. Reading Horizons, 48, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J., and Osborne, J. 2001. Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Browder, D. M. and Flynn, L. 2015. Teaching students with intellectual disability to use a self-questioning strategy to comprehend social studies text for an inclusive setting. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, J. I. and Miya, T. 1999. Acquisition and transfer of sentence construction in autistic students: Analysis by computer-based teaching. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 355–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar