A smartphone-regulated system for facilitating access to music and telephone calls and providing timely activity instructions to people with intellectual and multiple disabilities

References

• Ashley, D., Fossey, E. and Bigby, C. 2019. The home environments and occupational engagement of people with intellectual disabilities in supported living. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82, 698–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, K. M., Mechling, L. and Sansosti, F. J. 2013. The use of mobile technologies to assist with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders: Considerations for the future of school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balboni, G., Belacchi, C., Bonichini, S. and Coscarelli, A. 2016. Vineland II. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. 2nd ed. Firenze: Standardizzazione Italiana, OS.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. and Hersen, M. 2009. Single-case experimental designs. 3rd ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Boot, F. H., Owuor, J., Dinsmore, J. and MacLachlan, M. 2018. Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research : Jidr, 62, 900–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, J. 2019. Commentary on selection of assistive technology in a context with limited resources. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 14, 753–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella-Malone, H. I., Chan, J. M. and Jimenez, E. D. 2017. Comparing self-directed video prompting to least-to-most prompting in post-secondary students with moderate intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. Y. and Huang, S. W. 2022. Factors influencing the reputation of assistive technology resources center: An example from Yunlin County, Taiwan. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 10, 243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Channon, A. 2014. Intellectual disability and activity engagement: Exploring the literature from an occupational perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 21, 443–458.
   Google Scholar
• Chokron, S., Kovarski, K., Zalla, T. and Dutton, G. N. 2020. The inter-relationships between cerebral visual impairment, autism and intellectual disability. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 114, 201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuturi, L. F., Aggius-Vella, E., Campus, C., Parmiggiani, A. and Gori, M. 2016. From science to technology: Orientation and mobility in blind children and adults. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 240–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, L., Steel, E., Gupta, S., Delgado Ramos, V. and Roentgen, U. 2018. Assistive technology provision: Towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 13, 467–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desideri, L., Lancioni, G., Malavasi, M., Gherardini, A. and Cesario, L. 2021. Step instruction technology to help people with intellectual and other disabilities perform multistep tasks: A literature review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 33, 857–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, D., Layton, N., Bentley, J., Boot, F. H., Borg, J., Dhungana, B. M., Gallagher, P., Gitlow, L., Gowran, R. J., Groce, N., Mavrou, K., Mackeogh, T., McDonald, R., Pettersson, C. and Scherer, M. J. 2018. Assistive technology and people: A position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 13, 437–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkhuizen, A., Hilgenkamp, T. I., Krijnen, W. P., van der Schans, C. P. and Waninge, A. 2016. The impact of visual impairment on the ability to perform activities of daily living for persons with severe/profound intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 48, 35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenhuis, H. M., Sjoukes, L., Koot, H. M. and Kooijman, A. C. 2009. Does visual impairment lead to additional disability in adults with intellectual disabilities? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research : Jidr, 53, 19–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federici, S. and Scherer, M. J. (Eds). 2017. Assistive technology assessment handbook. 2nd ed. London, UK: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, T., Kriner, R., Sima, A., McDonough, J. and Wehman, P. 2015. Reducing the need for personal supports among workers with autism using an iPod Touch as an assistive technology: Delayed randomized control trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 669–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golisz, K., Waldman-Levi, A., Swierat, R. P. and Toglia, J. 2018. Adults with intellectual disabilities: Case studies using everyday technology to support daily living skills. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81, 514–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goo, M., Maurer, A. L. and Wehmeyer, M. L. 2019. Systematic review of using portable smart devices to teach functional skills to students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54, 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, A. E., Cannella-Malone, H. I. and Andzik, N. R. 2019. Effects of self-directed video prompting on vocational task acquisition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42, 87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarjoura, W. 2019. Disorientation and loss of wayfinding in individuals with congenital blindness and other affecting comorbidities. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 37, 240–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. 2011. Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. 2012. Behavior modification in applied settings. 7th ed. New York: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, E., Brangan, J., McCarron, M., McCallion, P., Bavussantakath, F. R. and O'Donovan, M.-A. 2022. Predictors of productivity and leisure for people aging with intellectual disability. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Revue Canadienne D'ergotherapie, 89, 135–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Tenerelli, G., Ricci, C., Marschik, P. B. and Desideri, L. 2021. Tying the delivery of activity step instructions to step performance: Evaluating a basic technology system with people with special needs. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 5, 488–497.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J. and Alberti, G. 2019. Recent technology-aided programs to support adaptive responses, functional activities, and leisure and communication in people with significant disabilities. Frontiers in Neurology, 10, 643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Campodonico, F. and Desideri, L. 2022a. A smartphone-based program enabling people with intellectual and other disabilities to access leisure, communication, and functional activities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22, 581–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., Zimbaro, C., Chiariello, V. and Campodonico, F. 2018. Supporting leisure and functional activity engagement in people with multiple disabilities via a technology-aided program. Technology and Disability, 29, 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Boccasini, A., Perilli, V. and Spagnuolo, C. 2017. Persons with multiple disabilities manage positive leisure and communication engagement through a technology-aided program. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Grillo, G., Desideri, L., Alberti, G. and Campodonico, F. 2020b. A new tablet-based program to support leisure and video calls in people with intellectual and motor disabilities. Technology and Disability, 32, 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Chiariello, V. and Carrella, L. 2020a. Everyday technology to support leisure and daily activities in people with intellectual and other disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 23, 431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Chiariello, V., Desideri, L. and Buono, S. 2023. Low-cost technology-aided programs for supporting people with motor, visual, and intellectual disabilities in functional forms of occupation and communication: Proof-of-concept study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 10, e44239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G. and Fiore, A. 2022b. People with intellectual and multiple disabilities access leisure, communication, and daily activities via a new technology-aided program. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 994416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M. L., Chiang, M. S., Shih, C. H. and Li, M. F. 2018. Improving the occupational skills of students with intellectual disability by applying video prompting combined with dance pads. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities : Jarid, 31, 114–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Locey, M. L. 2020. The evolution of behavior analysis: Toward a replication crisis? Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43, 655–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, W. J., Roberts, E., Bryze, K. and Parker Kent, J. A. 2016. Occupational engagement and adults with intellectual disabilities. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 7001350030p1–7001350030p6. doi:10.5014/ajot.2016.016576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihailidis, A., Melonis, M., Keyfitz, R., Lanning, M., Van Vuuren, S. and Bodine, C. 2016. A nonlinear contextually aware prompting system (N-CAPS) to assist workers with intellectual and developmental disabilities to perform factory assembly tasks: System overview and pilot testing. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 11, 604–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, M. T., Sans, J. C. and Colomina Fosch, M. T. 2021. Behavioral and cognitive interventions with digital devices in subjects with intellectual disability: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 647399. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.647399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, V., Olmschenk, G., Seiple, W. H. and Zhu, Z. 2022. ASSIST: Evaluating the usability and performance of an indoor navigation assistant for blind and visually impaired people. Assistive Technology, 34, 289–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OʼNeill, B., Best, C., Oʼneill, L., Ramos, S. D. S. and Gillespie, A. 2018. Efficacy of a micro-prompting technology in reducing support needed by people with severe acquired brain injury in activities of daily living: A randomized control trial. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 33, E33–E41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J. and Davis, J. L. 2011. Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, W. D. and Cheney, C. D. 2017. Behavior analysis and learning. 6th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plackett, R., Thomas, S. and Thomas, S. 2017. Professionals’ views on the use of smartphone technology to support children and adolescents with memory impairment due to acquired brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 12, 236–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, K. N., Johnson, F., Adams, S. E., Kiss, C. W. and Ryan, J. B. 2020. Use of a iPhone task analysis application to increase employment-related chores for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35, 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanetti, L. M. H. and Collier-Meek, M. A. 2014. Increasing the rigor of procedural fidelity assessment: An empirical comparison of direct observation and permanent product review methods. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 60–88.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. N. and Taber-Doughty, T. 2017. Self-operated auditory prompting systems for individuals with intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of single-subject research. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 42, 249–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., O’Brien, A., Yu, C., Abramson, J., Allen, A. A., Flynn, S. and Shane, H. C. 2017. Repurposing everyday technologies to provide just-in-time visual supports to children with intellectual disability and autism: A pilot feasibility study with Apple Watch. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 221–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H. C., Allen, A. A., Abramson, J., Laubscher, E. and Dimery, K. 2016. Just-in-Time supports in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepley, S. B., Ayres, K. M., Cagliani, R. and Whiteside, E. 2018b. Effects of self-mediated video modeling compared to video selfprompting for adolescents with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53, 264–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepley, S. B., Spriggs, A. D., Samudre, M. and Elliot, M. 2018a. Increasing daily living independence using video activity schedules in middle school students with intellectual disability. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33, 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. and Castellan, N. J. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Macgraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V. and Balla, D. A. 2005. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. 2nd ed. Vineland II, Minneapolis: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, J. C., Cook, B. G., Therrien, W. J. and Coyne, M. D. 2016. Replication research and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachaja, A., Agarwal, P., Zink, M., Adame, M. R., Möller, K. and Burgard, W. 2017. Navigating blind people with walking impairments using a smart walker. Autonomous Robots, 41, 555–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthen, D. and Luiselli, J. K. 2019. Comparative effects and social validation of support strategies to promote mindfulness practices among high school students. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 41, 221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar