Developing standard operating procedures for gene drive research in disease vector mosquitoes

References

• Champer J, Buchman A, Akbari OS. Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(3):146.10.1038/nrg.2015.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Gene drives on the horizon: advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Heitman E, Sawyer K, Collins JP. Gene drives on the horizon: issues for biosafety. Appl Biosaf. 2016;21(4):4.
   Google Scholar
• Webber BL, Raghu S, Edwards OR. Opinion: is CRISPR-based gene drive a biocontrol silver bullet or global conservation threat? Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2015;112(34):10565–10567.10.1073/pnas.1514258112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan AL, Parent B, Shen M, et al. No time to waste – the ethical challenges created by CRISPR. EMBO Rep. 2015;16(11):1421–1426.10.15252/embr.201541337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esvelt K. Precaution: open gene drive research. Science. 2017;355(6325):589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCarlo JE, Chavez A, Dietz SL, et al. Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in yeast. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(12):1250–1255.10.1038/nbt.3412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz VM, Bier E. The mutagenic chain reaction: a method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations. Science. 2015;348(6233):442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz VM, Jasinskiene N, Tatarenkova O, et al. Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(49):E6736.10.1073/pnas.1521077112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond A, Galizi R, Kyrou K, et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(1):78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esvelt KM, Smidler AL, Catteruccia F, et al. Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations. eLife. 2014;3:e03401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble C, Min J, Olejarz J, et al. Daisy-chain gene drives for the alteration of local populations. bioRxiv. 2016:057307.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall JM, Akbari OS. Gene drive strategies for population replacement. In: Adelman ZN, editor. Genetic control of malaria and dengue. Elsevier; 2015. 9, p. 169–200.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis C. Possible use of translocations to fix desirable genes in insect pest populations. Nature. 1968;218(5139):368–369.10.1038/218368a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis S, Bax N, Grewe P. Engineered underdominance allows efficient and economical introgression of traits into pest populations. J Theor Biol. 2001;212(1):83–98.10.1006/jtbi.2001.2357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari OS, Matzen KD, Marshall JM, et al. A synthetic gene drive system for local, reversible modification and suppression of insect populations. Curr Biol. 2013;23(8):671–677.10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Huang H, Ward C, et al. A synthetic maternal-effect selfish genetic element drives population replacement in Drosophila. Science. 2007;316(5824):597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galizi R, Doyle LA, Menichelli M, et al. A synthetic sex ratio distortion system for the control of the human malaria mosquito. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galizi R, Hammond A, Kyrou K, et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 sex-ratio distortion system for genetic control. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelman ZN, Tu Z. Control of mosquito-borne infectious diseases: sex and gene drive. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32(3):219.10.1016/j.pt.2015.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari OS, Bellen HJ, Bier E, et al. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory. Science. 2015;349(6251):927–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict M, Tabachnick W, Higgs S, et al. Arthropod containment guidelines-(Version 3.1)-A project of the American Committee of Medical Entomology-American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2003;3(2):75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict M, D’Abbs P, Dobson S, et al. Guidance for contained field trials of vector mosquitoes engineered to contain a gene drive system: recommendations of a scientific working group. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8(2):127.10.1089/vbz.2007.0273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict M, Bier E, Burt A, et al. Recommendations for laboratory containment and management of gene drive systems in arthropods. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017; Oct 17. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2017.2121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. 5th ed. Washington (DC): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health Human Services; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules. Bethesda (MD): US Department of Health Human Services; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Isaman V, Thelin R. Standard operating procedures (SOPs): reason for, types of, adequacy, approval, and deviations from and revisions to. Qual Assur. 1995;4(3):167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baber N. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use (ICH). Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;37(5):401.10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb05705.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton BL. International conference on harmonization-good clinical practices update. Drug Inf J. 1998;32(4):1143–1147.10.1177/009286159803200434
   Google Scholar
• Lillrank P, Liukko M. Standard, routine and non-routine processes in health care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2004;17(1):39–46.10.1108/09526860410515927
   Google Scholar
• Bains S, Bhandari M, Hanson B. Standard operating procedures: the devil is in the details. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2009;19(3):195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chemical Laboratory Safety and Security. A guide to Prudent chemical management. Washington (DC): National Research Council of the National Academies of Science; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Oukem-Boyer OO, Munung NS, Tangwa GB. Small is beautiful: demystifying and simplifying standard operating procedures: a model from the ethics review and consultancy committee of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17(1):27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oye K, Esvelt K, Appleton E, et al. Biotechnology. Regulating gene drives. Science. 2014;345(6197):626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbe B, Verdonck K, Mukendi D, et al. The art of writing and implementing standard operating procedures (SOPs) for laboratories in low-resource settings: review of guidelines and best practices. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(11):e0005053.10.1371/journal.pntd.0005053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Biosecurity challenges of the global expansion of high-containment biological laboratories: summary of a workshop. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar