Two unresolved issues in community engagement for field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes

References

• Macer D. Ethical, Legal, and social issues in genetically modified disease vectors. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Guidance framework for testing of genetically modified mosquitoes. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Gene drives on the horizon: advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kolopack PA, Lavery JV. Informed consent in field trials of gene-drive mosquitoes. Gates Open Res. 2017 Dec 11;1:14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik DB. Ethical issues in field trials of genetically modified disease-resistant mosquitoes. Dev World Bioeth. 2014;14(1):37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik DB. Ethics of community engagement in field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes. Dev World Bioeth. 2018;18(2):135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhaus CP. Community engagement and field trials of genetically modified insects and animals. Hastings Cent Rep. 2018;48(1):25–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins JP. Gene drives in our future: challenges of and opportunities for using a self-sustaining technology in pest and vector management. BMC Proc. 2018;12(Suppl 8):9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stirling A, Hayes KR, Delborne J. Towards inclusive social appraisal: risk, participation and democracy in governance of synthetic biology. BMC Proc. 2018;12(Suppl 8):15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudenko L, Palmer MJ, Oye K. Considerations for the governance of gene drive organisms. Pathog Glob Health. 2018;112(4):162–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofler N, Collins JP, Kuzma J, et al. Editing nature: local roots of global governance. Science. 2018;362(6414):527–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaebnick GE, Heitman E, Collins JP, et al. Precaution and governance of emerging technologies. Science. 2016;354(6313):710–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meghani Z, Kuzma J. Regulating animals with gene drive systems: lessons from the regulatory assessment of a genetically engineered mosquito. J Respon Innov. 2018;5(sup1):S203–S222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meghani Z, Boëte C. Genetically engineered mosquitoes, Zika and other arboviruses, community engagement, costs, and patents: ethical issues. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(7):e0006501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond AM, Galizi R. Gene drives to fight malaria: current state and future directions. Pathog Glob Health. 2017;111(8):412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Malaria. [ cited 2019 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.who.int/malaria/en/
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. 2019. Dengue, epidemiology. [ cited Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/dengue/epidemiology/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho DO, McKemey AR, Garziera L, et al. Suppression of a field population of Aedes aegypti in Brazil by sustained release of transgenic male mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(7):e0003864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxitec. Press release, 14 July 2016: dengue fever cases drop 91% in Neighborhood of Piracicaba, Brazil, where Oxitec’s Friendly™ Aedes were released.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. 2016. Environmental assessment for investigational use of Aedes aegypti OX513A. [cited 2019 Jul 5]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/99722/download
   Google Scholar
• Mathis S 2018 Feb 20. Oxitec is courting the keys again. Keys Weekly. [cited 2019 Jul 5]. Available from: https://keysweekly.com/42/mosquito-oxitec-is-courting-the-keys-again/
   Google Scholar
• Oxitec. 2018. Application for proposed experimental program. [cited 2019 Jul 5]. Available from: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0756-0002
   Google Scholar
• Carballar-Lejarazú R, James AA. Population modification of Anopheline species to control malaria transmission. Pathog Glob Health. 2017;111(8):424–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz VM, Jasinskiene N, Tatarenkova O, et al. Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E6736–E6743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann A, Thompson D. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin JS. When the people speak: deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek JS, Bächtiger A, Chambers S, et al. The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Science. 2019;363(6432):1144–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrader-Frechette KS. Environmental justice: creating equity, reclaiming democracy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik DB, MacDougall DR, Smith EM. Ethical dilemmas in protecting susceptible subpopulations from environmental health risks: liberty, utility, fairness, and accountability for reasonableness. Am J Bioethics. 2018;18(3):29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindana PO, Singh JA, Tracy CS, et al. Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2007;4(9):e273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery JV, Tinadana PO, Scott TW, et al. Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research. Trends Parasitol. 2010;26(6):279–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolopack PA, Parsons JA, Lavery JV. What makes community engagement effective?: lessons from the eliminate dengue program in Queensland Australia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(4):e0003713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James S, Collins FH, Welkhoff PA, et al. Pathway to deployment of gene drive mosquitoes as a potential biocontrol tool for elimination of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: recommendations of a scientific working group. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(6_Suppl):1–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik DB. Environmental health ethics. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer J. How to connect bioethics and environmental ethics: health, sustainability, and justice. Bioethics. 2009;23(9):497–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental justice. [ cited 2019 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice
   Google Scholar
• Gostin LO. General justifications for public health regulation. Pub Health. 2007;121(11):829–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass NE. An ethics framework for public health. Am J Pub Health. 2001;91(11):1776–1782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faden R 2015. Public health ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [cited 2019 Jul 7]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/publichealth-ethics/#Pat
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix KS, Sturm LA, Zimet GD, et al. Ethics and childhood vaccination policy in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(2):273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11. 1905.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1971.
   Google Scholar