Integrated model for understanding Indian physicians’ internet usage pattern: An empirical approach

References

• McKinsey & Company. India pharma 2015 unlocking the potential of the Indian pharmaceuticals market. Mumbai, India: Gautam Kumra, Palash Mitra, Chandrika Pasricha; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• IMS Health Incorporated. 2010, Market prognosis.
   Google Scholar
• Confederation of Indian Industry. Pharma Summit Report. 2010. India Pharma Inc.: Capitalising on India's growth potential. New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Bhangale V. Pharma marketing in India: opportunities, challenges and the way forward. J Med Mark: Device Diagn Pharm Mark 2008;8(3):205–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Bhatnagar D. Linking emotional dissonance and organizational identification to turnover intention and emotional well-being: A study of medical representatives in India. Hum Res Manage 2010;49(3):401–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Dash S. Effectiveness of e-detailing as an innovative pharmaceutical marketing tool in emerging economies: views of health care professionals of India. J Med Mark: Device Diagn Pharm Mark 2011;11(3):204–14.
   Google Scholar
• Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India. OPPI code of pharmaceutical marketing practices 2010. Mumbai, India; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India. OPPI code of pharmaceutical practices 2012. Mumbai, India; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi M, Joshi A. Use of the internet among health care professionals in a rural medical college in India. J Electronic Res Med Libraries 2009;6(1):33–39.
   Google Scholar
• CEGEDIM Strategic Data, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Masters K. For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2008;77(1):4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chew F, Grant W, Tote R. Doctors on-line: using diffusion of innovations theory to understand internet use. Med Inf 2004;36(9):645–50.
   Google Scholar
• Markus LM, Robey D. Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research, Manage Sci 1988;34(5):583–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwardhan AA, Pandey N, Dhume SM. Analysis of physicians’ technology acceptance literature in changing Indian pharmaceutical marketing context: a Markus and Robey's causal structure approach. Int J Market Bus Commun 2014a;3(2):33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 1989;35(8):982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson AR, Massey PD, Cronan TP. On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quart 1993;17(2):227–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chismar WG, Wiley-Patton S. Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2002;155–9.
   Google Scholar
• Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quart 1992;16(2):227–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu P, Chau P, Liu Sheng O, Tam K. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology, J Manag Inform Syst 1999;16(2):91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris M, Gordon D, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 2003;27(3):425–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Shih H, Sher PJ. Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: the TRAM model. Psychol Market 2007;24(7):641–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dishaw MT, Strong DM. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Inform Manag 1999;36(1): 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Zhang P. Applying Markus and Robey's causal structure to examine user technology acceptance research: a new approach. J Inform Technol Theory Appl (JITTA), 2006;8(2):21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Moon J, Kim Y. Extending the TAM for a world wide web context. Inform Manag 2001;38(4):217–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians- a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev 2007;64(6):650–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manag 2003;40(3):191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 1st ed., Glencoe: Free Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon DR, Stewart M. Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: survey instrument valuation. American Medical Informatics Association AMIA Proceedings; 2000. pp. 185–9.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A. Technology readiness index (Tri): a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies, J Serv Res 2000;2(4):307–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mick DG, Fournier S. Paradoxes of technology: consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. J Con Res 1998;25(2):123–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen K. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Ann Rev Psychol 2002;53:605–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen K, Davis W. Causal indicator models: identification, estimation, and testing. Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association Convention, Miami, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Riefler P, Roth K. Advancing formative measurement models. J Bus Res 2008;61:1203–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwardhan AA, Pandey N, Dhume SM. Understanding physicians’ internet adoption pattern: a hybrid approach for pharmaceutical marketing. Int J Market Bus Commun 2015;4(2):53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. On becoming a pragmatic researcher: the importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. Int J Soc Res Method 2005;8(5):375–87.
   Google Scholar
• Patwardhan AA, Pandey N, Dhume SM. Leveraging technology adoption model for examining internet usage among physicians’ in changing Indian pharmaceutical marketing context: a structural equation modeling approach. J Med Market 2014b;14(4):201–11.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill GA, Jr. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Market Res 1979;16(1):64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF. Scale development-theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE. Hedonic shopping motivations. J Retailing 2003;79(2):77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberseder M, Schlegelmilch BB, Murphy PE, Gruber V. Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility: scale development and validation. J Bus Ethics 2013. ISSN 1573-0697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes SN, Richard D, Kubany ES. Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess 1995;7(3):238–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res 2003;27(2):94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau PYK, Hu P. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Dec Sci 2001;32(4):699–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau PYK, Hu P. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. J Manag Inform Syst 2002a;18(4):191–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau PYK, Hu P. Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inform Manag 2002b;39(4):297–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusilier M, Durlabhji S. An exploration of student internet use in India: the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behaviour. Campus-Wide Inform Syst 2005;22(4):233–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kim BG, Park SC, Lee KJ. A structural equation modeling of the Internet acceptance in Korea. Electron Commer Res Appl 2007;6(4):425–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripanont N. Examining a technology acceptance model of internet usage by academics within Thai Business Schools. Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University Melbourne: School of Information Systems Faculty of Business and Law; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks VM, Blanken P. Snowball sampling: theoretical and practical considerations. In: Hendricks VM, Blanken P., Adriaans N. (eds.) Snowball sampling: a pilot study on cocaine use. Rotterdam: IVO; 1992. p. 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Spreen M. Rare populations, hidden populations, and link-tracing designs: what and why? Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 1992;36(1):34–58.
   Google Scholar
• Faugier J, Sargeant M. Sampling hard to reach populations. J Adv Nurs 1997;26(4):790–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson R, Flint J. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Soc Res Update 2001:33(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wille GW. A stepwise procedure for the empirical assessment of latent variable models. Unpublished master's thesis. Port Elizabeth: University of Port Elizabeth; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JCB. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Raubenheimer J. An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. SA J Ind Psychol 2004;30(4):59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gaur AS, Gaur SS. Statistical methods for practice and research: a guide to data analysis using SPSS. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Sage Publication Pvt. Ltd.; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis practical assessment. Res Evaluat 2005;10(7): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Jae-on, Mueller CW. Introduction to factor analysis: what it is and how to do it. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Jr., Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sengars AH, Grover V. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quart, 1993;17(4):517–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF. The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1996;1(1): 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhas PS, Manrai AK, Manrai LA, Ramjit. Role of structural equation modeling in theory testing and development. Quantitative modelling in marketing and management. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J, Black B, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham, R. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Walczuch R, Lemnik J, Streukens S. The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. J Inform Manag 2007;44(2):206–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogmus N, Esen M. An investigation of the effects of technology readiness on technology acceptance in e-HRM. roc 7th Int Strat Manag Conf, 2011;24:487–95.
   Google Scholar
• Godoe P, Johansen T. Understanding adoption of new technologies: technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. J Eur Psychol Student. 2012;3(1):38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lee YH, Hsieh YC, Hsu CN. Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: supporting employees’ intentions to use E-learning systems. Educ Technol Soc 2011;14(4):124–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Guo X, Chen G. IDT-TAM integrated model for IT adoption. Tsinghua Sci Technol 2008;13(3):306–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz BW, Mory L, Ullrich S. eHealth in the public sector: an empirical analysis of the acceptance of Germany's electronic health card. Publ Admin 2012;90(3):642–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chismar W, Wiley-Patton S. Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians? Proc 36th Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci. 2003;160–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tulu B, Burkhard RJ, Horan TA. Continuing use of medical information systems by medical professionals: empirical evaluation of a work system model. Commun Assoc Inform Syst 2006;18(1): 641–56.
   Google Scholar
• Han S, Pekka M, Matti S, Markku K. Physicians’ acceptance of mobile communication technology: an exploratory study. Int J Mobile Commun 2006;4(2):210–30.
   Google Scholar
• Yi M, Jackson JD, Park, JS, Probst JC. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Inform Manag 2006;43(3):350–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park Y, Chen JV. Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Ind Manag Data Syst 2007;107(9):1349–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter E. Marketing “smart” medical innovation: physicians’ attitudes and intentions. Int J Pharm Health Market 2008;2(4):307–20.
   Google Scholar
• Walter Z, Lopez MS. Physician acceptance of information technologies: role of perceived threat to professional autonomy. Decis Support Syst 2008;46(1):206–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Rodríguez T, Monge-Lozano P, Romero-Alonso M. Acceptance of E-prescriptions and automated medication-management systems in hospitals: an extension of the technology acceptance model. J Inf Syst 2012;26(1):77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos G, Rizomyliotis I, Konstantoulaki K. Antecedents of online professional services’ perceived usefulness: an empirical research. Int J Manag Cases 2012;14(4):73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A, Colby CL. Techno-ready marketing: how and why your customers adopt technology. New York: Free Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lerer L. Pharmaceutical marketing segmentation in the age of the Internet. Int J Med Market 2002;2(2):159–66.
   Google Scholar
• Karyani D. Cluster analysis of physician's values, prescribing behaviour and attitudes towards firms’ marketing communications. Int J Customer Relat Market Manag 2010:1(4):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Walczuch R, Lemnik J, Streukens S. The effect of service employees' technology readiness on technology acceptance. J Inform Manag 2007;44(2):206–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Wang S. What drives mobile commerce? an empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance mode. Inform Syst 2005;42(5):719–29.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inform Sys Res 1995;6(4):144–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000;46(2):186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Gillenson M, Sherrell D. Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Inform Manage 2002;39(8):705–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy S, Everard A, Jones B. An examination of the technology acceptance model in Uruguay and the US: a focus on culture. J Global Inform Technol Manage 2005;8(1):27–45.
   Google Scholar