Target income and its determinants for general physicians: An instrumental variables approach

References

• Folland S, Goodman AC, Stano M. The economics of health and health care. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Preker AS., et al. Public ends, private means: strategic purchasing of health services. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mohapatra S. Better healthcare at reduced cost through electronic integration of patient care data. Int J Electron Healthc. 2009;5(1):87–98. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2009.026274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohapatra S. Using integrated information system for patient benefits: a case study in India. Int J Healthc Manag. 2015;8(4):262–271. doi: 10.1179/2047971915Y.0000000007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra S, Murarka S. Improving patient care in hospital in India by monitoring influential parameters. Int J Healthc Manag. 2016;9(2):83–101. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2015.1101938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abiodun AJ, Osibanjo OA, Adeniji AA, et al. Modelling the relationship between job demands, work attitudes and performance among nurses in a transition economy. Int J Healthc Manag. 2014;7(4):257–264. doi: 10.1179/2047971914Y.0000000073
   Google Scholar
• Ireri S, Walshe K, Benson L, et al. A qualitative and quantitative study of medical leadership and management: experiences, competencies, and development needs of doctor managers in the United Kingdom. J Manag Mark Healthc. 2011;4(1):16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Alameddine M, Bauer JM, Richter M, et al. The paradox of falling job satisfaction with rising job stickiness in the German nursing workforce between 1990 and 2013. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0228-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuburović NB, Dedić V, Đuričić S, et al. Determinants of job satisfaction of healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Belgrade, Serbia-cross-sectional analysis. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2016;144(3–4):165–173. doi: 10.2298/SARH1604165K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parveen M, Maimani K, Kassim NM., et al. A comparative study on job satisfaction between registered nurses and other qualified healthcare professionals. Int J Healthc Manag. 2016;10:238–242. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2016.1265781
   Google Scholar
• Gabrani A, Hoxha A, Gabrani J, et al. Perceived organizational commitment and job satisfaction among nurses in Albanian public hospitals: A cross-sectional study. Int J Healthc Manag. 2016;9(2):110–118. doi: 10.1179/2047971915Y.0000000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave DS, Dotson MJ, Cazier JA, et al. The impact of intrinsic motivation on satisfaction with extrinsic rewards in a nursing environment. J Manage Market Healthc. 2011;4(2):101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol WJ. Price controls for medical services and the medical needs of the nation’s elderly (second of two parts). Conn Med. 1988;52(9):542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloan FA., et al. Physician fee inflation: evidence from the late 1960s. The role of health insurance in the health services sector. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. 1976: 321–362.
   Google Scholar
• Eastaugh SR. Medical economics and health finance. Boston: Auburn House Publishing Company; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Eastaugh SR., et al. Health economics: efficiency, quality, and equity. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Feldstein MS. The rising price of physicians’ services. Rev Econ Stat. 1970;52(2):121–133. doi: 10.2307/1926113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans RG. Supplier-induced demand: some empirical evidence and implications. Econ Health Med Care. 1974;6:162–173. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-63660-0_10
   Google Scholar
• Newhouse JP. A model of physician pricing. South Econ J. 1970;37:174–183. doi: 10.2307/1056127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire TG. Physician agency. Handb Health Econ. 2000;1:461–536.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg JE. Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action. Health Aff. 1984;3(2):6–32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pauly MV, Satterthwaite MA. The pricing of primary care physicians services: a test of the role of consumer information. Bell J Econ. 1981;12:488–506. doi: 10.2307/3003568
   Google Scholar
• Farley PJ. Theories of the price and quantity of physician services: A synthesis and critique. J Health Econ. 1986;5(4):315–333. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90007-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS, Sutton M, Leese B, Giuffrida A, et al. Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001;6(1):44–55. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lieberman AA, Turner WM, et al., editors. Assessing the effect of vendorship on fee setting for social workers: An empirical test. Social work research and abstracts. Washington, D.C: Oxford University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Cromwell J, Mitchell JB. Physician-induced demand for surgery. J Health Econ. 1986;5(4):293–313. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90006-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Wehner P. Physician-induced demand for childbirths. J Health Econ. 1994;13(1):61–73. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)90004-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice TH. The impact of changing medicare reimbursement rates on physician-induced demand. Med Care. 1983;21(8):803–815. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198308000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinwald B, Sloan FA. Determinants of physicians’ fees. J Bus. 1974;47(4):493–511. doi: 10.1086/295677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton J, Eakin BK. The utility-maximizing self-employed physician. J Hum Resour. 1997;32:98–128. doi: 10.2307/146242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo JA, Blumenthal D. Is the target income hypothesis an economic heresy? Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53(3):243–266. doi: 10.1177/107755879605300301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney GH. The market for physicians’ services: theoretical implications and an empirical test of the target income hypothesis. South Econ J. 1982;48(3): 594. doi: 10.2307/1058653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo JA, Zeckhauser RJ. Reference incomes, loss aversion, and physician behavior. Rev Econ Stat. 2003;85(4):909–922. doi: 10.1162/003465303772815817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo JA, Blumenthal D. Physician income targets: new evidence on an old controversy. Inquiry: J Med Care Organ Provision Financ. 1994;31(4):394–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire TG, Pauly MV. Physician response to fee changes with multiple payers. J Health Econ. 1991;10(4):385–410. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90022-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contandriopoulos D, Perroux M. Fee increases and target income hypothesis: data from Quebec on physicians’ compensation and service volumes. Healthcare Policy Politiques de Sante. 2013;9(2):30–35. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2013.23613
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kantarevic J, Kralj B, Weinkauf D. Income effects and physician labour supply: evidence from the threshold system in Ontario. Can J Econ. 2008;41(4):1262–1284. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo JA, Blumenthal D. Physician labor supply: Do income effects matter? J Health Econ. 1994;13(4):433–453. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)90012-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo JA, Zeckhauser RJ. Pushing incomes to reference points: Why do male doctors earn more? J Econ Behav Organ. 2007;63(3):514–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winney WO., et al. Target income hypothesis: a study of cardiology compensation. South Carolina: Medical University of South Carolina; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bayati M, Rashidian A, Akbari Sari A, et al. General practitioners’ views on key factor affecting their desired income: a principal component analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:236–240. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.41
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek M., et al. A guide to modern econometrics. Chichester,England: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist S, Dahlberg M. Small sample properties of LIML and jackknife IV estimators: experiments with weak instruments. J Appl Econ. 1999;14(1):69–88. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199901/02)14:1<69::AID-JAE521>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBI. Foreign Exchange Rates 2015 [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.cbi.ir/ExRates/rates_en.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Durbin J. Errors in variables. Rev Int Stat Inst. 1954;22:23–32. doi: 10.2307/1401917
   Google Scholar
• Hausman JA., et al. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica. 1978;46:1251–1271. doi: 10.2307/1913827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D-M., et al. Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances: finite sample results. Econometrica. 1974;42:529–546. doi: 10.2307/1911789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi F. Econometrics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M., et al. A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J Bus Econ Stat. 2002;20:518–529. doi: 10.1198/073500102288618658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargan JD. The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica. 1958;26:393–415. doi: 10.2307/1907619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmann RL. On finite sample distributions of generalized classical linear identifiability test statistics. J Am Stat Assoc. 1960;55(292):650–659. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1960.10483365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen LP. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica. 1982;50:1029–1054. doi: 10.2307/1912775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson TW, Rubin H. The asymptotic properties of estimates of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations. Ann Math Stat. 1950;21:570–582. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729752
   Google Scholar
• World Development Indicators [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
   Google Scholar
• Bashaw DJ, Heywood JS. The gender earnings gap for US physicians: has equality been achieved? Labour. 2001;15(3):371–391. doi: 10.1111/1467-9914.00169
   Google Scholar
• Esteves-Sorenson C, Snyder J. The gender earnings gap for physicians and its increase over time. Econ Lett. 2012;116(1):37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer ES, Deal AM, Pruthi NR, Gonzalez CM, Kirby EW, Langston J, et al. Gender differences in compensation, job satisfaction and other practice patterns in urology. J. Urol. 2016;195(2):450–455. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerberg E. Women doctors in Norway: the challenging balance between career and family life. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(7):1327–1341. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00513-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlenberg P, Cooney TM. Male and female physicians: family and career comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(3):373–378. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90192-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M., et al. Physicians and management in health care. Maryland: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards N, Kornacki MJ, Silversin J. Unhappy doctors: what are the causes and what can be done? BMJ. 2002;324(7341):835–838. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imran N, Haider II, Bhatti MR. Unhappy doctors in Pakistan: What are the causes and what can be done? 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Papadimos TJ, Harter RL, Marco AP. Cyclical vs. structural economic weakness: the effects on physician mobility and recruiting. Phys Exec. 2011;37(3):18–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar