Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Healthcare Management Volume 13, 2020 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
220
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
On Collaborative Human Resources Policy Development

Learning through networking in healthcare and welfare: The use of a breakthrough collaborative in the Swedish context

Ann-Christine Anderssona School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0409-1985
ORCID Icon,
Marie Golsäterb Department of Nursing, Child Research Group, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden;c Futurum Academy for Health and Care Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-6677
ORCID Icon,
Boel Andersson Gärec Futurum Academy for Health and Care Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden;a School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1176-8173
ORCID Icon &
Anna Melkea School of Health and Welfare, The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden;d The Göteborg Region Association of Local Authorities, Gothenburg, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1728-9763
ORCID Icon
Pages 236-244 | Received 28 Jun 2017, Accepted 31 Oct 2017, Published online: 13 Nov 2017

References

  • Special Issue: Analysing the impact of health system changes in the EU member states. Health Economics. 2005;14(S1):S1–S263. doi: 10.1002/hec.1025
  • Øvretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, et al. Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(4):345–351. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.345
  • IHI (Institute for Healthcare Improvement). The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. Cambridge: IHI; 2003.
  • Kilo CM. A framework for collaborative improvement: lessons from the institute for healthcare improvement’s breakthrough series. Qual Manag Health Care. 1998;6(4):1–14. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199806040-00001
  • SALAR [Internet]. Stockholm: Swedish association of local authorities and regions online resources. [cited 2017 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.skl.se/.
  • Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, et al. The improvement guide. A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd ed.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
  • Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Godfrey MM, editors. Quality by design; a clinical microsystems approach. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2007.
  • Andersson A-C, Ainalem I, Berg A, et al. Challenges to improve inter-professional care and service collaboration for people living with psychiatric disabilities in ordinary housing. Qual Manag Health Care. 2016;25(1):44–52. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000076
  • Shaw EK, Chase SM, Howard J, et al. More black box to explore: how quality improvement collaborative shape practice change. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(2):149–157. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110090
  • Dückers MLA, Spreeuwenberg P, Wagner C, et al. Exploring the black box of quality improvement collaboratives: modelling relations between conditions, applied changes and outcomes. Implement Sci. 2009;4(74). DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-4-74.
  • Schouten LM., Hulscher MEJL, van Everdingen JJE, et al. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ Online. 2008. DOI:10.1136/bmj.39570.749884.BE.
  • Peterson A. Learning and understanding for quality improvement under different conditions – an analysis of quality registry-based collaboratives in acute and chronic care [dissertation]. Jönköping, Sweden: Jönköping University; 2015.
  • Andersson A-C. Quality improvement in healthcare: experiences from a Swedish county council initiative [dissertation]. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University; 2013.
  • Wilson T, Berwick DM, Cleary PD. What do collaborative improvement projects do? Experiences from seven countries. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003;29(2):85–93.
  • Ellström P-E. Knowledge creation through interactive research: a learning perspective. Proceedings of the HSS 07 Conference Universities and Society in Collaboration; 2007 May 8–11; Jönköping University.
  • Ellström P-E. Organizational learning. In: McGaw B, Peterson PL, Baker E, editors. International encyclopedia of education. 3rd ed.Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010. p. 47–52.
  • Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(1):138–150. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.138
  • Walshe K, Freeman T. Effectiveness of quality improvement: learning from evaluations. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(1):85–87. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.85
  • SFS: 1982:763. The Swedish healthcare act. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare. [cited 2017 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/.
  • SFS: 2010:659. The patient safety act. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare. [cited 2017 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/.
  • Kvale S, Brinkmann S. The qualitative research interview [Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2014.
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994.
  • WMA [Internet] World Medical Association. [cited 2017 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/20activities/10ethics/10helsinki/index.html/.
  • Townsend J. The trainer’s pocketbook. 10th ed. Management Pocketbooks Ltd; 2003.
  • Godfrey M. Improvement capability at the front lines of healthcare: helping through leading and coaching [dissertation]. Jönköping, Sweden: Jönköping University; 2013.
  • Gustafson DH, Quanbeck AR, Robinson JM, et al. Which elements of improvement collaboratives are most effective? A cluster-randomized trial. Addiction. 2013;108(6):1145–1157. doi: 10.1111/add.12117
  • Nadeem E, Olin SS, Campbell Hill L, et al. Understanding the components of quality improvement collaboratives: A systematic literature review. Milbank Q. 2013;91(2):354–394. doi: 10.1111/milq.12016

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.