A framework for evaluating health communication aimed at breast and cervical cancer screening adherence: A pilot study on websites of Italian local health organizations

References

• Kreuter MW, Green MC, Cappella JN, et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(3):221–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best AL, Vamos C, Choi SK, et al. Increasing routine cancer screening among underserved populations through effective communication strategies: application of a health literacy framework. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32(2):213–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vujadinovic N. Communication and public relations in healthcare. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020;274:42–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cvijović J, Kostić-Stanković M, Krstić G, et al. Marketing communication in the area of breast and cervical cancer prevention. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016;73(6):544–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen EL, Scott AM, Record R, et al. Using communication to manage uncertainty about cervical cancer screening guideline adherence among Appalachian women. J Appl Commun Res. 2016;44(1):22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [Internet]. Global health estimates 2020: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000-2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020; [cited 2022 May 30]. Available from: who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death.
   Google Scholar
• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol P, Petty RE. Fundamental processes leading to attitude change: implications for cancer prevention communications. J Commun. 2006;56(1):S81–S104.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen NT, Nguyen LT, Le HT, et al. How to integrate screening for cervical cancer into grassroots health services for low income countries: An implementation research. Int J Healthc Manag. 2021;14(4):1057–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker LM, Rychetnik L, Carter SM. The role of communication in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(741):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson JO, Mullins RM, Siahpush M, et al. Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socioeconomic groups. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(5):867–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch JK, Nickel BL, Ghanouni A, et al. Improving communication about cancer screening: moving towards informed decision making. Public Health Res Pract. 2017;27(3):e2731728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell MM, Jackson C, Cheuvront B. Health communication on the internet: An effective channel for health behavior change? J Health Commun. 1998;3(1):71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang GJ, Penson DF. Internet health resources and the cancer patient. Cancer Invest. 2008;26(2):202–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang E, Wang J, Liu T. Interactive e-health tools for patients on Chinese hospitals’ websites. Int J Healthc Manag. 2014;7(2):75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Arghittu A, Deiana G, Dettori M, et al. Web-based analysis on the role of digital media in health communication: the experience of VaccinarSinSardegna website. Acta Biomed. 2021;92(6):e2021456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowen DJ, Miller SM. Communication in cancer prevention and control. J Health Commun. 2009; 14(Suppl 1):3–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharf BF. Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the internet. Women Health. 1997;26(1):65–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navin MC, Attwell K. Imperfect immunization communication on school district websites: a mixed-methods review. J Sch Nurs. 2022;38(5):459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakar V, Kulkarni A, Holschuh C, et al. Contraception information on the websites of student health centers in the United States. Contracept. 2022;112:68–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman TJ, Prakash T, Khan KS. Quality of health information for cervical cancer treatment on the internet. BMC Womens Health. 2006;6(1):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans WD, Uhrig J, Davis K, et al. Efficacy methods to evaluate health communication and marketing campaigns. J Health Commun. 2009;14(4):315–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pealer LN, Dorman SM. Evaluating health-related Web sites. J Sch Health. 1997;67(6):232–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambre J, Guard R, Perveiler F, et al. [Internet] (1999). Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the internet. Health Summit II and III Meetings. [cited 2022 May 07]. Available from: http://www.aeemt.com/contenidos_socios/Informatica/Guias_y_recomendaciones/Criteria_Quality_Health_Inform_19971014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, et al. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. Br Med J. 1999;318(7184):647–649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giacomo PD, Maceratini R. Health websites in Italy: use, classification and international policy. Med Inform Internet Med. 2002;27(3):153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. eEurope 2002: quality criteria for health related websites. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4(3):e15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joaquín MJ, Llinás G, Tomás O, et al. Quality of websites in Spanish public hospitals. Med Inform Internet Med. 2006;31(1):23–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitten P, Nazione S, Lauckner C. Tools for assessing the quality and accessibility of online health information: initial testing among breast cancer websites. Inform Health Soc Care. 2013;38(4):366–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancker JS, Kern LM, Abramson E, et al. The triangle model for evaluating the effect of health information technology on healthcare quality and safety. J Am Med Inform Association. 2012;19(1):61–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Chen J, Gan X, et al. Eight-Element communication model for internet health rumors: a New exploration of lasswell’s “5W communication model”. Healthcare. 2022;10(12):2507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinelli S, Collm A, Glässel A, et al. Designing interactivity on consumer health websites: PARAFORUM for spinal cord injury. Patient Educ Counseling. 2013;93(3):459–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despres C, Aguilar R, McAlister A, et al. Communication for awareness and action on inequitable impacts of COVID-19 on Latinos. Health Promotion Pract. 2020;21(6):859–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulkaidah U, Santoso B, Fatmasari D, et al. Indonesian sign language visualization model (BISINDO) website-based oral health on tooth brushing behavior in deaf children. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol. 2022;7(11):378–383.
   Google Scholar
• Kreps GL. Evaluating health communication programs to enhance health care and health promotion. J Health Commun Inter Pers. 2014;19(12):1449–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siano A, Conte F, Amabile S, et al. Communicating sustainability: an operational model for evaluating corporate websites. Sustainability. 2016;8:950–966.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Newsweek & Statista [Internet]. (2022). New York: NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC; 2022 [cited 2022 April 20]. Available from: https://www.newsweek.com/worlds-best-specialized-hospitals-2022/oncology.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K, Bock MA. The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations. Hum Commun Res. 2004;30(3):411–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momenipour A, Rojas-Murillo S, Murphy B, et al. Usability of state public health department websites for communication during a pandemic: a heuristic evaluation. Int J Ind Ergon. 2021;86:103216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusa G. La percezione del valore. Milano: Maggioli; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Istat [Internet]. Regioni italiane per popolazione. Rome: Istat; 2022; [cited 2022 May 18]. Available from: https://www.tuttitalia.it/regioni/popolazione/.
   Google Scholar
• AIRTUM [Internet]. I numeri del cancro in Italia. Milano: AIRTUM; 2020; [cited 2022 June 13]. Available from: https://www.registri-tumori.it/cms/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/2020_Numeri_Cancro-pazienti.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ronchi A [Internet]. Sanità territoriale: perché il futuro della nostra salute passa dal territorio. Milano: HealthTech; 2022; [cited 2022 May 18]. Available from: https://www.healthtech360.it/strategie-globali-per-la-salute-digitale/sanita-territoriale/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health [Internet]. Atto di indirizzo per l’anno 2022. Rome: Ministry of Health; 2022; [cited 2022 May 09]. Available from: https://www.salute.gov.it/portale/ministero/documenti/Atto_indirizzo_2022_DEFINITIVO.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang KP, Jackson A. Health literacy and its outcomes: application and extension of elaboration likelihood model. Int J Healthc Manag. 2013;6(3):152–157.
   Google Scholar
• Ananchenkova PI, Simonec NL, Tonkonog VV. Management of advertising communication in health care organizations. Probl Soc Hyg Public Health Hist Med. 2020;28(1):687–693.
   Google Scholar
• Kreps GL. Strategic use of communication to market cancer prevention and control to vulnerable populations. Health Mark Q. 2008;25(1–2):204–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suddaby R, Greenwood R. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Adm Sci Q. 2005;50(1):35–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers JC. How institutions communicate: institutional messages, institutional logics, and organizational communication. Manag Commun Q. 2011;25(1):154-182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar