References
- Fang F, Zhou Y, Ying S, et al. A study of the ping an health app based on user reviews with sentiment analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1591.
- Hillis A, Germain J, Whitfield M, et al. Internet sourcing and unsafe use of controlled drugs (opioids, sedatives and GABA drugs) in the UK: an in depth case study of consumer dynamics during COVID-19. emerging trends in drugs. Addict Health. 2023;3:100049.
- Mathrani A, Sarvesh T, Umer R. Digital divide framework: online learning in developing countries during the COVID-19 lockdown. globalisation. Societies Educ. 2022;20(5):625–640.
- Chowdhury LAM, Rana T, Azim MI. Intellectual capital efficiency and organisational performance: in the context of the pharmaceutical industry in Bangladesh. J Intellect Capital. 2019;20(6):784–806.
- Neger M, Uddin B. Factors affecting consumers’ internet shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Bangladesh. Chinese Bus Rev. 2020;19(3):91–104.
- International Trade Administration. Bangladesh - healthcare and pharmaceuticals. 2022. [cited November 14, 2022]. Available from: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/bangladesh-healthcare-and-pharmaceuticals.
- Statista. EHealth - Worldwide | Statista Market Forecast. 2022. [cited November 14, 2022]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/digital-health/ehealth/worldwide
- Business Inspection. Pharmaceutical industry of Bangladesh: prospects and future challenges. 2022. [cited November 14, 2022]. Available from: https://businessinspection.com.bd/pharmaceutical-industry-of-bangladesh.
- Ma L. Understanding non-adopters’ intention to use internet pharmacy: revisiting the roles of trustworthiness, perceived risk and consumer traits. J Eng Tech Manage. 2021;59:101613.
- Sabbir MM, Islam M, Das S. Understanding the determinants of online pharmacy adoption: a two-staged SEM-neural network analysis approach. J Sci Technol Policy Manag. 2021;12(4):666–687.
- Alwon BM, Solomon G, Hussain F, et al. A detailed analysis of online pharmacy characteristics to inform safe usage by patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37:148–158.
- Karattuthodi MS, Thorakkattil SA, Kuzhiyil AK, et al. Implementation of virtual clinical pharmacy services by incorporating medical professionals and pharmacy students: a novel patient-oriented system to advance healthcare in India. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022;5:100126.
- Varghese Assin TJ, George NA, Sivakumar P. Perceived risk and online purchase intention of E-pharmacy: examining the moderating role of online trust in the Indian context. Spec Educ. 2022;1(1):(43) 9663–9685.
- Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KR. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Informat Syst. 2003;12(1):752–780.
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Human Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.
- Yuniarti FR, Arief H, Meydia H, et al. Online retailers’ ethics and its effect on repurchase intention: the mediating role of perceived risk. Cogent Bus Manag. 2022;9(1):2051691.
- Uzir MUH, Al Halbusi H, Thurasamy R, et al. The effects of service quality, perceived value and trust in-home delivery service personnel on customer satisfaction: evidence from a developing country. J Retail Consum Serv. 2021;63:102721.
- Nayak KM, Bhatt V, Nagvadia J. Measuring impact of factors influencing to consumer buying intention with respect to online shopping. Int J Manag. 2021;12(1):230–241.
- Srivastava M, Raina M. Consumers’ usage and adoption of e-pharmacy in India. Inte J Pharmaceut Healthcare Market. 2020;15(2):235–250.
- Attar RW, Amidi A, Hajli N. The role of social presence and trust on customer loyalty. Br Food J. 2022;125(1):96–111.
- Wisker ZL. Examining relationship quality in e-tailing experiences: a moderated mediated model. Market Intell Plan. 2020;38(7):863–876.
- Chou CY, Leo WWC, Chen T. Servicing through digital interactions and well- being in virtual communities. J Serv Mark. 2021;36(2):217–231.
- Homans GC. Social behavior as exchange. AJS. 1958;63(6):597–606.
- Rousseau DM. Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Empl Responsib Rights J. 1989;2(2):121–139.
- Sin LY, Alan CB, Yau OH, et al. Relationship marketing orientation: scale development and cross-cultural validation. J Bus Res. 2005;58(2):185–194.
- Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340.
- Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.
- Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Chan FK, et al. Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Inf Syst J. 2011;21(6):527–555.
- Ashrafi DM, Easmin R. Okay Google, good to talk to You … examining the determinants affecting users’ behavioral intention for adopting voice assistants: does technology self-efficacy matter? Int J Innov Technol Manag. 2022;20(2):1–30.
- Patel KJ, Patel HJ. Adoption of internet banking services in Gujarat: an extension of TAM with perceived security and social influence. Int J Bank Mark. 2018;36(1):147–169.
- Natarajan T, Balasubramanian SA, Kasilingam DL. Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity. J Retail Consum Serv. 2017;37:8–22.
- de Luna IR, Liébana-Cabanillas F, Sánchez-Fernández J, et al. Mobile payment is not all the same: the adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2019;146:931–944.
- Rouibah K, Abbas H, Rouibah S. Factors affecting camera mobile phone adoption before e-shopping in the Arab world. Technol Soc. 2011;33(3-4):271–283.
- Lee T, Jun J. Contextual perceived value?: investigating the role of contextual marketing for customer relationship management in a mobile commerce context. Bus Process Manag J. 2007;13(6):798–814.
- Ventre I, Kolbe D. The impact of perceived usefulness of online reviews, trust and perceived risk on online purchase intention in emerging markets: a Mexican perspective. J Int Consum Mark. 2020;32(4):287–299.
- Eneizan B, Alsaad A, Alkhawaldeh A, et al. E-wom, trust, usefulness, ease of use, and online shopping via websites: the moderating role of online shopping experience. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2020;98(13):2554–2565.
- Hajiheydari N, Ashkani M. Mobile application user behavior in the developing countries: a survey in Iran. Inf Syst. 2018;77:22–33.
- Ismagilova E, Hughes L, Dwivedi YK, et al. Smart cities: advances in research—An information systems perspective. Int J Inf Manage. 2019;47:88–100.
- Saprikis V, Avlogiaris G, Katarachia A. A comparative study of users versus Non-users’ behavioral intention towards M-banking apps’ adoption. Information. 2022;13(1):30.
- Ashrafi DM, Alam I, Anzum M. An empirical investigation of consumers’ intention for using ride-sharing applications: does perceived risk matter? Int J Innov Technol Manag. 2021;18(08):2150040.
- Zhang J, Luximon Y, Song Y. The role of consumers’ perceived security, perceived control, interface design features, and conscientiousness in continuous use of mobile payment services. Sustainability. 2019;11(23):1–16.
- Belanche D, Flavián M, Pérez-Rueda A. Mobile apps use and wom in the food delivery sector: the role of planned behavior, perceived security and customer lifestyle compatibility. Sustainability. 2020;12(10):1–21.
- Gracia DB, Ariño LVC, Blasco MG. The effect of culture in forming e-loyalty intentions: a cross-cultural analysis between Argentina and Spain. BRQ Bus Res Q. 2015;18(4):275–292.
- Harris MA, Brookshire R, Chin AG. Identifying factors influencing consumers’ intent to install mobile applications. Int J Inf Manage. 2016;36(3):441–450.
- Salamzadeh A, Ebrahimi P, Soleimani M, et al. Grocery apps and consumer purchase behavior: application of Gaussian mixture model and multi-layer perceptron algorithm. J Risk Financ Manag. 2022;15(10):424. DOI:10.3390/jrfm15100424.
- Rahman MA, Islam MA, Esha BH, et al. Consumer buying behavior towards online shopping: an empirical study on Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Cogent Bus Manag. 2018;5(1):1–22.
- Han W, Raab C, Belarmino A, et al. Are online meal delivery platforms part of the sharing economy? J Foodserv Bus Res. 2022;25(3):253–276.
- Wang K, Zhou Y, Zhang L. A workload-balancing order dispatch scheme for O2O food delivery with order splitting choice. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022;17(1):295–312.
- Huang WH, Shen GC, Liang CL. The effect of threshold free shipping policies on online shoppers’ willingness to pay for shipping. J Retail Consum Serv. 2019;48:105–112.
- Al-Adwan AS, Al-Debei MM, Dwivedi YK. E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: the driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions. Technol Soc. 2022;71:102083.
- Saha SK, Duarte P, Silva SC, et al. The role of online experience in the relationship between service convenience and future purchase intentions. J Internet Commer. 2022: 1–28.
- Chandrasekhar N, Gupta S, Nanda N. Food delivery services and customer preference: a comparative analysis. J Foodserv Bus Res. 2019;22(4):375–386.
- Manfredi E, Capik P. A case of trust-building in the supply chain: emerging economies perspective. Strateg Change. 2022;31(1):147–160.
- Bisdikian C, Gibson C, Chakraborty S, et al. Inference management, trust and obfuscation principles for quality of information in emerging pervasive environments. Pervasive Mob Comput. 2014;11:168–187.
- Chin AG, Harris MA, Brookshire R. A bidirectional perspective of trust and risk in determining factors that influence mobile app installation. Int J Inf Manage. 2018;39:49–59.
- Singh N, Sinha N. How perceived trust mediates merchant’s intention to use a mobile wallet technology. J Retail Consum Serv. 2020;52:101894.
- Sarkar S, Chauhan S, Khare A. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;50:286–301.
- Kosim KP, Legowo N. Factors affecting consumer intention on QR payment of mobile banking: a case study in Indonesia. J Asian Fin Econ Bus. 2021;8(5):391–401.
- Lindh C, Rovira Nordman E, Melén Hånell S, et al. Digitalisation and international online sales: antecedents of purchase intent. J Int Consum Mark. 2020;32(4):324–335.
- Kumar A, Adlakaha A, Mukherjee K. The effect of perceived security and grievance redressal on continuance intention to use M-wallets in a developing country. Int J Bank Mark. 2018;36(7):1170–1189.
- Treiblmaier H, Sillaber C. The impact of blockchain on e-commerce: a framework for salient research topics. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2021;48:101054.
- Yuliati LN, Dradjat HA, Simanjuntak M. Online bike: role of perceived technology, perceived risk, and institution-based trust on service usage via online trust. Cogent Bus Manag. 2020;7(1):1–19.
- Dhagarra D, Goswami M, Kumar G. Impact of trust and privacy concerns on technology acceptance in healthcare: an Indian perspective. Int J Med Inf. 2020;141:104164.
- Liébana-Cabanillas F, Muñoz-Leiva F, Sánchez-Fernández J. A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment. Serv Bus. 2018;12(1):25–64.
- Asti WP, Handayani PW, Azzahro F. Influence of trust, perceived value, and attitude on customers’ repurchase intention for E-grocery. J Food Products Market. 2021;27(3):157–171.
- Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, et al. Purposive sampling: complex or simple? research case examples. J Res Nurs. 2020;25(8):652–661.
- Ho TH, Chen Y. Vietnamese consumers’ intention to use online shopping: the role of trust. Int J Bus Manag. 2014;9(5):145–159.
- Natarajan T, Balasubramanian SA, Kasilingam DL. The moderating role of device type and age of users on the intention to use mobile shopping applications. Technol Soc. 2018;53:79–90.
- Oghuma AP, Libaque-Saenz CF, Wong SF, et al. An expectation-confirmation model of continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging. Telemat Inform. 2016;33(1):34–47.
- Gupta P, Sachan A, Kumar R. Different stages of the e-service delivery system process: belief–attitude–intention framework. Int J Retail Distrib Manage. 2020;48(7):687–706.
- Hair Jr JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res. 2020;109:101–110.
- Hair J, Hollingsworth CL, Randolph AB, et al. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2017;117(3):442–458.
- Henseler J. Partial least squares path modeling: Quo Vadis? Qual Quant. 2018;52(1):1–8.
- Shiau WL, Sarstedt M, Hair JF. Internet research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Internet Res. 2019;29(3):398–406.
- Ashrafi DM, Habiba W, Alam I. An assessment of the behavioural intention for using ride-sharing services: empirical evidence from a developing country. Malays J Consu Family Econ. 2020;24(1):36–62.
- Li J, Verteramo Chiu LJ, Gómez MI, et al. Strategies to reduce risk perception among grocery shoppers in the US: a survey study. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0251060.
- Kimball A, Hatfield KM, Arons M, et al. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled nursing facility—King County, Washington. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(13):377.
- Kim JJ, Kim I, Hwang J. A change of perceived innovativeness for contactless food delivery services using drones after the outbreak of COVID-19. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021;93:102758.
- Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1564–1567.