Moral women, immoral technologies? Romanian women’s perceptions of assisted reproductive technologies versus adoption

References

• Adamson, G.D. and Baker, V.L., 2003. Subfertility: causes, treatment and outcome. best practice & research. Clinical obstretics and gynaecology, 17 (2), 169–185. doi:10.1016/S1521-6934(02)00146-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2012. Age and fertility. A guide for patients. Available from: https://www.reproductivefacts.org/globalassets/rf/news-and-publications/bookletsfact-sheets/english-fact-sheets-and-info-booklets/Age_and_Fertility.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K.M., et al., 2003. Distress and concerns in couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic. Journal of Psychosomatic research, 54 (4), 353–355. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00398-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, S.F., 1990. Surrogacy arrangements and the conflict of laws. Wisconsin law review, 1990 (2), 399–482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Appleton, T., 2001. Surrogacy. Current opinion in obstetrics and gynecology, II, 256–257. doi: 10.1054/cuog.2001.0187
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., et al., 2017. Surrogate mother - praiseworthy or stigmatized: a qualitative study on perceptions of surrogacy in Assam, India. Global health action, 10 (1), 1328890. doi:10.1080/16549716.2017.1328890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astefanesei, A. 2018. Mame de închiriat. Trafic cu suflete de copii (Mothers for rent. Trafficking children’s souls). Available from: https://www.euractiv.ro/social/mame-de-inchiriat.-trafic-cu-suflete-de-copii-11996 .
   Google Scholar
• Baluch, B., et al., 1996. Psychology and non-psychology students’ estimation of their desirable and undesirable personality traits. Personality and Individual differences, 21 (4), 617–620. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00101-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholet, E., et al., 1994. Rethinking the choice to have children. when, how, and whether or not to bear children. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 1058–1073. doi: 10.1177/0002764294037008007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bausch, R.S., 2006. Predicting willingness to adopt a child: A consideration of demographic and attitudinal factors. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 47–65. doi: 10.1525/sop.2006.49.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., 2019. Trying to have your own first; it’s what you do: the relationship between adoption and medicalized infertility. Qualitative Sociology, 3, 479–498. doi: 10.1007/s11133-019-09421-3
   Google Scholar
• Bello, F.A., Akinajo, O.R., and Olayemi, O., 2014. In-vitro fertilization, gamete donation and surrogacy: perceptions of women attending an infertility clinic in Ibadan, Nigeria. African journal of reproductive health, 18 (2), 127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhaz-Jorge, C., et al., 2020. Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European society of human reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Human reproduction open, 1, hoz044. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoz044.
   Google Scholar
• Chliaoutakis, J.E., 2002. A relationship between traditionally motivated pattern and gamete donation and surrogacy in urban area of Greece. Human reproduction, 17, 2187–2191. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.8.2187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coakes, S.J.S.P.S.S., 2005. Analysis without anguish: version 12.0 for Windows. Queensland, Australia: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cudmore, L., 2005. Becoming parents in the context of loss. Sexual and relationship Therapy, 20, 299–308. doi: 10.1080/14681990500141204
   Google Scholar
• Daniluk, J.C. and Koert, E., 2012. Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction. Human reproduction, 27 (8), 2405–2412. doi:10.1093/humrep/des190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeny, E., 2017. Networks of reproduction: politics and practices surrounding surrogacy in Romania. In: M Davies, ed. Babies for Sale? surrogacy, human rights and the politics of reproduction. London: Zed Books, 123.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, P.C., Ryan, I.J., and Oț Brien, K., 1988. College students’ acceptance of adoption and five alternative fertilization techniques. Journal of Sex research, 24 (1), 282–287. doi:10.1080/00224498809551425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelman, L., 1994. Homographesis: essays in gay literary and cultural theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, R.J., 2004. Surrogacy: the psychological issues. Journal of reproductive and Infant Psychology, 22, 123–136. doi: 10.1080/0264683042000205981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. and Baronavski, C., 2018. How do European countries differ in religious commitment? Use our interactive map to find out. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/12/05/how-do-european-countries-differ-in-religious-commitment/.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, W.G., et al., 2008. Environmental contaminants and human infertility: hypothesis or cause for concern? Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health -part B, Critical Reviews, 11 (3-4), 162–176. doi:10.1080/10937400701873274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genuis, S.J., Chang, W.C., and Genuis, S.K., 1993. Public attitudes in Edmonton toward assisted reproductive technology. Canadian medical Association Journal, 149 (2), 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunberg, P., Miner, S., and Zelkowitz, P., 2020. Infertility and perceived stress: the role of identity concern in treatment-seeking men and women. Human fertility, 5, 1–11. doi:10.1080/14647273.2019.1709667.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F.J., et al., 2006. Mutivariate data analysis. Technometrics, 31 (3), 179.
   Google Scholar
• Halman, L.J., Abbey, A., and Andrews, F.M., 1992. Attitudes about infertility interventions among fertile and infertile couples. American Journal of public Health, 82, 191–194. doi:10.2105/AJPH.82.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanpoor-Azghdy, S.B., Simbar, M., and Vedadhir, A., 2014. The emotional-psychological consequences of infertility among infertile women seeking treatment: results of a qualitative study. Iranian journal of reproductive medicine, 12 (2), 131–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendriks, S., et al., 2017. The importance of genetic parenthood for infertile men and women. Human reproduction, 32 (10), 2076–2087. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, N., et al., 2009. “Public” perceptions of gamete donation: a research review. Public Understanding of Science, 18 (1), 61–77. doi:10.1177/0963662507078396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igreja, A.R. and Ricou, M., 2019. Surrogacy: challenges and ambiguities. The New bioethics. A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the body, 25 (1), 60–77. doi:10.1080/20502877.2019.1564007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioan, B. and Astarastoae, V., 2008. Ethical and legal aspects in medically assisted human reproduction in Romania. Human reproduction & genetic ethics, 14 (2), 2–13. doi: 10.1558/hrge.v14i2.4
   Google Scholar
• Kailasam, C., Sykes, K., and Jenkins, J., 2001. A survey of public attitudes to gamete donation. Journal of fertility Counselling, 8 (2), 45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., 2015. In vitro fertilisation: the Science and the ethics in the 21st century. Human reproduction & genetic ethics, 7 (1), 15–20. doi:10.1179/hrge.7.1.u384347k7561200w.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V., 1994. Attitudes toward surrogate motherhood in Canada. Health care for women international, 15 (4), 333–357. doi:10.1080/07399339409516126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langdridge, D., Connolly, K.J., and Sheeran, P., 2000. A network analytic study of the reasons for wanting a child. Journal of reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18, 321–338. doi: 10.1080/713683044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas, M.N., et al., 2012. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLOS medicine, 9 (12), e1001356. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, C.E., 1987. The stigma of adoptive parent status: perceptions of community attitudes toward adoption and the experience of informal social sanctioning. Family relations: an interdisciplinary journal of applied family studies, 36 (1), 34–39. doi:10.2307/584644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, C.E., 1994. Community constructs of involuntary childlessness: sympathy, stigma, and social support. The Canadian review of sociology and anthropology, 31, 392–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-618X.1994.tb00828.x
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M., et al., 2002. Infertility in focus: how far would you go? Journal of reproductive and Infant Psychology, 20, 192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazawa, A., … Osuga, Y., 2019. A survey of public attitudes toward uterus transplantation, surrogacy, and adoption in Japan. Plos one, 14 (10), e0223571. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padela, A.I., Klima, K., and Duivenbode, R., 2020. Producing parenthood: Islamic bioethical perspectives & normative implications. The new bioethics. A multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body, 26 (1), 17–37. doi:10.1080/20502877.2020.1729575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pallant, J., 2001. SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (version 10). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poote, A.E. and van den Akker, O.B.A., 2009. British women's attitudes to surrogacy. Human reproduction, 24 (1), 139–145. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Präg, P. and Mills, M.C., 2017. Cultural determinants influence assisted reproduction usage in Europe more than economic and demographic factors. Human reproduction, 32 (11), 2305–2314. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pro Vita. 2011. Scrisoare deschisă adresată Ministrului Sănătăţii, dl. Cseke Attila, privind Programul de fertilizare in vitro şi embriotransfer (An open letter addressed to the Ministry of Health, to Mr. Cseke Attila, Regarding the In-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer Program. Available from: http://provitabucuresti.ro/docs/lobby/min.san.FIVmai2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rautakallio-Hokkanen, S. 2018. Available from: http://www.fertilityeurope.eu/fertility-ed/, consulted on November the 30th, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M., Pennings, G., and Appleby, J.B., 2012. Reproductive donation. Practice, policy, and bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutstein, S.O. and Shah, I.H. 2004. Infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in developing countries. DHS Comparative Reports No. 9. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro and the World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Sabarre, K.A., et al., 2013. A qualitative study of Ottawa university students’ awareness, knowledge and perceptions of infertility, infertility risk factors and assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Reproductive Health, 10, 41. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker, J., 1997. Infertility evaluation and treatment according to Jewish law. European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 71, 113–121. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02621-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman, P., 2010. Intercountry adoption as globalized motherhood. In: W. Chavkin, and J.M. Mather, ed. The Globalization of motherhood: deconstructions and reconstructions of biology and care. New York: Routledge, 79–104.
   Google Scholar
• Shreffler, K.M., Johnson, D.R., and Scheuble, L.K., 2010. Ethical problems with infertility treatments: attitudes and explanations. The social science journal, 47 (4), 731–746. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2010.07.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, E., Corning, A., and Antonucci, T., 1999. Attitudes toward genetic testing and fetal diagnosis, 1990–1996. Journal of health and social Behavior, 40 (4), 429–445. doi: 10.2307/2676335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoog Svanberg, A., et al., 2003. Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden. Human reproduction, 18 (10), 2205–2215. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuber, K.R. and Haunani Solomon, D., 2008. Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and infertility: a qualitative study of discourse within online forums. Journal of social and personal relationships, 25 (5), 831–855. doi:10.1177/0265407508096698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K., et al., 2006. Analysis of national representative opinion surveys concerning gestational surrogacy in Japan. European journal of obstetrics & gynecology reproductive biology, 126, 39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Balen, F., Verdurmen, J., and Ketting, E., 1997. Choices and motivations of infertile couples. Patient education and Counseling, 31, 19–27. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(97)01010-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O.B.A., 2007. Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Human reproduction update, 13 (1), 53–62. doi:10.1093/humupd/dml039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Laningham, J.L., 2012. Social factors predicting women’s consideration of adoption. Michigan family review, 16 (1), 1–21. doi:10.3998/mfr.4919087.0016.101.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, C., 2016. Womb rentals and baby-selling: does surrogacy undermine the human dignity and rights of the surrogate mother and child? the new bioethics. A multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body, 22 (3), 212–228. doi:10.1080/20502877.2016.1238582.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg, A., et al., 2016. Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: a survey in women 30-39 years of age. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 95 (1), 38–44. doi:10.1111/aogs.1278 doi: 10.1111/aogs.12781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar