References
- Abortion Act. 1967. [online] Available at: < https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/87> [Accessed 5 July 2021].
- Abortion Rights. 2014. Sex-selective abortion. Available at: < http://abortionrights-org-uk.stackstaging.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Sex-selection-.pdf> [Accessed 22 March 2022].
- Abortion Rights 2021. Who we are. [online] Abortion Rights. Available at: < https://abortionrights.org.uk/who-we-are/> [Accessed 18 July 2021].
- Abortion Rights Campaign. 2016. Abortion FAQs. [online] Abortion Rights Campaign. Available at: < https://www.abortionrightscampaign.ie/2016/08/06/abortion-faqs/> [Accessed 18 July 2021].
- Abortion Rights. n.d. Statement on later abortion. Available at: < http://test.abortionrights.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/AR-PS-Later-abortions.pdf> [Accessed 22 March 2022].
- Adams, S. 2021. Surge in 999 calls over at home abortions | Daily Mail Online. [online] Available at: < https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9958219/Surge-999-calls-home-abortions.html> [Accessed 6 September 2021].
- Adams, S., and MacFarlane, J. 2021. Doctor banned from saving babies of women who regretted abortion pills. [online] Mail Online. Available at: < https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9632581/NHS-consultant-banned-saving-babies-mothers-started-pills-post-abortiions.html> [Accessed 28 June 2021].
- Adams, S., and MacFarlane, J. 2022. ‘I saved precious babies from pills-by-post terminations … but nearly paid with my career’: NHS consultant tells how he beat a ‘campaign’ to have him struck off for ‘abortion reversals’ he provided to 65 women for free. Mail Online. [online] 6 Mar. Available at: < https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10582077/How-NHS-consultant-beat-campaign-struck-abortion-reversals.html> [Accessed 8 March 2022].
- Archer, N. 2021. UK regulator investigates doctor for ‘abortion reversal’ treatment. [online] Open Democracy. Available at: < https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/uk-regulator-investigates-doctor-for-abortion-reversal-treatment/> [Accessed 28 June 2021].
- Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. 2021. ACTRN12620000596909 (PAMper Trial). [online] Available at: < https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379661&isReview=true> [Accessed 3 April 2022].
- Bellieni, C.V., and Buonocore, G., 2013. Abortion and subsequent mental health: review of the literature. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 67 (5), 301–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12067.
- Catholic Union Webinar with Dr Dermot Kearney. 2022. Catholic Union Available at: < https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXlUIeh1RmU> [Accessed 2 April 2022].
- CDC. 2020. Data & Statistics on Birth Defects. [online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: < https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/data.html> [Accessed 21 March 2022].
- ChoGlueck, C., 2021. Broadening the scope of our understanding of mechanisms: lessons from the history of the morning-after pill. Synthese, 198 (3), 2223–2252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02201-0.
- Christian Concern. 2022. Vindication for doctor banned for saving babies as GMC drop case against use of abortion reversal treatment. [online] Christian Concern. Available at: < https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/vindication-for-doctor-banned-for-saving-babies-as-gmc-drop-case-against-use-of-abortion-reversal-treatment/> [Accessed 8 March 2022].
- Coomarasamy, A., et al., 2015. A Randomized trial of progesterone in women with recurrent miscarriages. New England Journal of medicine, 373 (22), 2141–2148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504927.
- Creinin, M.D., et al., 2020. Mifepristone antagonization With progesterone to prevent medical abortion: A Randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & gynecology, 135 (1), 158–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003620.
- Creinin, M.D., and Chen, M.J., 2019. Mifepristone antagonization requires real studies to evaluate safety and efficacy. Contraception, 100 (6), 427–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.10.016.
- Davenport, M.L., et al., 2017. Embryo survival after mifepristone: A systematic review of the literature. Issues in Law & Medicine, 32 (1), 17.
- Declaration of Donna Harrison, M.D. In the District Court of Oklahoma County State of Oklahoma; No. CV-2019-2176. 12 p.
- Declaration of Dr. Donna Harrison. In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee; Case No. 3:20-cv-00740.
- Delgado, G., et al., 2018. A case series detailing the successful reversal of the Effects of Mifepristone using progesterone. Issues in Law and medicine, 33 (1), 21–31.
- Delgado, G., and Davenport, M.L., 2012. Progesterone Use to reverse the effects of mifepristone. Annals of pharmacotherapy, 46 (12), 1723–1723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1R252.
- Department of Health & Social Care. 2022a. Freedom of Information Request Reference FOI-1386760.
- Department of Health & Social Care 2022b. Freedom of Information Request Reference FOI-1394830.
- Electronic Medicines Compendium. 2021a. Mifegyne - Summary of Product Characteristics. [online] Available at: < https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/3783/smpc#PHARMACOLOGICAL_PROPS> [Accessed 2 July 2021].
- Electronic Medicines Compendium 2021b. Topogyne 400 microgram Tablets - Summary of Product Characteristics. [online] Available at: < https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/3234/smpc#PHARMACOLOGICAL_PROPS> [Accessed 2 July 2021].
- Electronic Medicines Compendium 2022c. Cyclogest 400 mg pessaries - Summary of Product Characteristics. [online] Available at: < https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/5569/smpc> [Accessed 21 March 2022].
- FDA. 2015. FDA’s Decision Regarding Plan B: Questions and Answers. FDA. [online] Available at: < https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/fdas-decision-regarding-plan-b-questions-and-answers> [Accessed 13 January 2022].
- Fergusson, D.M., Horwood, L.J., and Boden, J.M., 2013. Does abortion reduce the mental health risks of unwanted or unintended pregnancy? A re-appraisal of the evidence. Australian & New Zealand Journal of psychiatry, 47 (9), 819–827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413484597.
- Gamble, N.K., and Pruski, M., 2019. Medical acts and conscientious objection: what can a physician be compelled to do? The New bioethics, 25 (3), 262–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2019.1649871.
- Garratt, D., and Turner, J.V., 2017. Progesterone for preventing pregnancy termination after initiation of medical abortion with mifepristone. The European Journal of contraception & reproductive health care, 22 (6), 472–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2017.1412424.
- General Medical Council. 2019. Good medical practice. Available at: < https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/good-medical-practice—english-1215_pdf-51527435.pdf> [Accessed 1 June 2019].
- General Medical Council 2021. Prescribing unlicensed medicines. [online] Available at: < https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/good-practice-in-prescribing-and-managing-medicines-and-devices/prescribing-unlicensed-medicines> [Accessed 11 July 2021].
- Glasziou, P., et al., 2007. When are randomised trials unnecessary? picking signal from noise. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 334 (7589), 349–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39070.527986.68.
- Glenza, J. 2021. UK-based doctor under investigation over abortion ‘reversal’ medication. The Guardian. [online] 27 May. Available at: < http://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/27/uk-doctor-abortion-reversal-medication> [Accessed 28 June 2021].
- GOV.UK. 2014. Off-label or unlicensed use of medicines: prescribers’ responsibilities. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: < https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/off-label-or-unlicensed-use-of-medicines-prescribers-responsibilities> [Accessed 20 January 2022].
- GOV.UK 2022a. Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2020. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: < https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales-2020/abortion-statistics-england-and-wales-2020> [Accessed 22 March 2022].
- GOV.UK 2022b. England to return to pre-pandemic system for early abortions. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: < https://www.gov.uk/government/news/england-to-return-to-pre-pandemic-system-for-early-abortions> [Accessed 29 March 2022].
- GOV.WALES. 2022. Written Statement: Arrangements for Early Medical Abortion at Home. [online] GOV.WALES. Available at: < https://gov.wales/written-statement-arrangements-early-medical-abortion-home> [Accessed 5 April 2022].
- Grossman, D., and White, K., 2018. Abortion ‘reversal’ - legislating without evidence. The New England Journal of Medicine, 379 (16), 1491–1493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1805927.
- Hagemann, V., Bausewein, C., and Remi, C., 2019. Drug use beyond the licence in palliative care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Palliative Medicine, 33 (6), 650–662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319840602.
- Health and Care Bill. [online] Available at: < https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3022/publications> [Accessed 7 May 2022].
- Heartbeat International. 2021. Abortion Pill Rescue Network. [online] Available at: < https://www.heartbeatinternational.org/our-work/apr> [Accessed 1 August 2021].
- Howick, J., Glasziou, P., and Aronson, J.K., 2009. The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill’s ‘guidelines for causation’ contribute? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102 (5), 186–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2009.090020.
- Kearney, D., 2019. Offering a second chance: abortion pill reversal. Catholic Medical quarterly, 69 (2), 11–12.
- Kmietowicz, Z., 2011. Abortion does not increase mental health problems in women, shows review. BMJ, 343, d8045. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8045.
- Macleod, C., Chiweshe, M., and Mavuso, J., 2018. A critical review of sanctioned knowledge production concerning abortion in Africa: implications for feminist health psychology. Journal of health psychology, 23 (8), 1096–1109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316644294.
- Ms B v An NHS Hospital Trust [2002] EWHC 429 (Fam). 2002. Available at: < https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2002/429.html> [Accessed 5 June 2021].
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health and Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. 2011. Induced abortion and mental health: a systematic review of the mental health outcomes of induced abortion, including their prevalence and associated factors. Available at: < https://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Induced_Abortion_Mental_Health_1211.pdf> [Accessed 3 July 2021].
- NHS. 2018. Emergency contraception (morning after pill, IUD). [online] nhs.uk. Available at: < https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception/emergency-contraception/> [Accessed 7 January 2022].
- NICE. 2019. Abortion care (NG140). Available at: < https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng140/resources/abortion-care-pdf-66141773098693> [Accessed 19 July 2021].
- NICE 2021. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management [NG126]. [online] Available at: < https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng126/chapter/Recommendations#management-of-miscarriage> [Accessed 16 January 2022].
- Reardon, D.C., 2018. The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities. SAGE open medicine, 6, 2050312118807624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118807624.
- Roberts, S.C.M., et al., 2017. Do 72-hour waiting periods and Two-visit requirements for abortion affect women’s certainty? A prospective cohort study. Women’s Health Issues: official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, 27 (4), 400–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2017.02.009.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2011. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion: Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 7.
- Scottish Government. 2020. Early medical abortion at home: consultation. [online] Available at: < http://www.gov.scot/publications/consultation-future-arrangements-early-medical-abortion-home/pages/2/> [Accessed 3 January 2022].
- Steinberg, J.R., 2011. Later Abortions and mental health: psychological experiences of women having Later Abortions—A critical review of research. Women’s Health issues, 21 (3), S44–S48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.002.
- Steinberg, J.R., et al., 2012. Fatal flaws in a recent meta-analysis on abortion and mental health. Contraception, 86 (5), 430–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.03.012.
- Stevenson, R., 2019. My body My choice: The fight for Abortion Rights: 2. illustrated edition ed. Victoria. British Columbia: Orca Book Publishers.
- Taylor, D., 2016. Prescribing according to diagnosis: how psychiatry is different. World psychiatry, 15 (3), 224–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20343.
- Tennessee Code § 39-15-218. Available at: < https://casetext.com/statute/tennessee-code/title-39-criminal-offenses/chapter-15-offenses-against-the-family/part-2-abortion/section-39-15-218-section-definitions-posting-of-sign-about-chemical-abortion-required-warning-about-chemical-abortion-required-statement-in-medical-discharge-instructions-required-information-prior-to-abortion-due-to-medical-emergency-department-of-health-materials-and-website-violations-civil-penalty-civil-action-for-damages-attorneys-fees-ruling-on-womans-anonymity> [Accessed 29 June 2021].
- Thomson, J.J., 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy & public affairs, 1 (1), 47–66.
- Yamabe, S., Katayama, K., and Mochizuki, M., 1989. [The effect of RU486 and progesterone on luteal function during pregnancy]. Nihon naibunpi gakkai zasshi, 65 (5), 497–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrine1927.65.5_497.