References
- Beckwith, F., 2007. Defending life: A moral and legal case against abortion choice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Berg, A., 2017. Abortion and miscarriage. Philosophical Studies, 174, 1217–1226.
- Blackshaw, B.P., 2019. The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion: a reply. Bioethics, 33 (6), 723–734.
- Blackshaw, B.P., 2021. Is pregnancy really a good samaritan Act? Christian bioethics, 27 (2), 158–168.
- Blackshaw, B.P., and Hendricks, P., 2020. Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47 (7), 515–518.
- Boonin, D., 2002. A defense of abortion (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Boonin, D., 2019. Beyond Roe: Why abortion should be legal—even if the fetus is a person. Oxford University Press.
- Crummett, D., 2020. Violinists, demandingness, and the impairment argument against abortion. Bioethics, 34 (2), 214–220.
- Davis, M., 2003. What’s philosophically interesting about engineering ethics? Science and engineering ethics, 9 (3), 353–361.
- Feinberg, J., 1978. Voluntary euthanasia and the inalienable right to life. Philosophy & public affairs, 7 (2), 93–123.
- Fischer, J.M., 2013. Abortion and ownership. Journal of ethics: An international philosophical review, 17 (4), 275–304.
- George, R.P., and Tollefsen, C., 2008. Embryo: A defense of human life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
- Hendricks, P., 2019a. Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument. Bioethics, 33 (2), 245–253.
- Hendricks, P.C., 2019b. (Regrettably) abortion remains immoral: The impairment argument defended. Bioethics, 33, 968–969.
- Hendricks, P., 2021. My body, not my choice: against legalised abortion. Journal of medical ethics, doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-107194.
- Locke, J., 1980. Second treatise of government. Edited by C. B. Macpherson. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing.
- Lovering, R., 2020. A moral argument for frozen human embryo adoption. Bioethics, 34 (3), 242–251.
- Marquis, D., 1989. Why abortion is immoral. Journal of philosophy, 86 (4), 183–202.
- Mulder, J., 2013. A short argument against abortion rights. Think, 12 (34), 57–68.
- Noonan Jr., J.T., 1970. An almost absolute value in history. In: J. T. Noonan Jr., ed. The morality of abortion: legal and historical perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 51–59.
- Ord, T., 2008. The scourge: moral implications of natural embryo loss. American Journal of Bioethics, 8, 12–19.
- Pickard, C., 2020. Abortion is incommensurable with fetal alcohol syndrome. Bioethics, 34 (2), 207–210.
- Plato, 1943. Plato's The republic. New York: Books, Inc.
- Rachels, J., 1979. Killing and starving to death. Philosophy (London, England), 54 (208), 159–171. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3750071.
- Räsänen, J., 2020. Against the impairment argument: a reply to hendricks. Bioethics, 34 (8), 862–864.
- Shakespeare, William, 1564–1616. The merchant of venice. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman, 1994.
- Simkulet, W., 2016a. A critique of henrik friberg-fernros’s defense of the substance view. Bioethics, 30, 767–773.
- Simkulet, W., 2016b. Abortion, property, and liberty. Journal of ethics: An international philosophical review, 20 (4), 373–383.
- Simkulet, W., 2021. On the impairment argument. Bioethics, 35 (5), 400–406.
- Thomson, J.J., 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy and public affairs, 1 (1), 47–66.
- Tooley, M., 1972. Abortion and infanticide. Philosophy and public affairs, 2 (1), 37–65.
- Trammell, R.L., 1975. Saving life and taking life. Journal of philosophy, 72 (5), 13I–137.