Publication Cover
The New Bioethics
A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body
Volume 28, 2022 - Issue 4
295
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Abortion, Rights, and Cabin Cases

ORCID Icon

References

  • Beckwith, F., 2007. Defending life: A moral and legal case against abortion choice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Berg, A., 2017. Abortion and miscarriage. Philosophical Studies, 174, 1217–1226.
  • Blackshaw, B.P., 2019. The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion: a reply. Bioethics, 33 (6), 723–734.
  • Blackshaw, B.P., 2021. Is pregnancy really a good samaritan Act? Christian bioethics, 27 (2), 158–168.
  • Blackshaw, B.P., and Hendricks, P., 2020. Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47 (7), 515–518.
  • Boonin, D., 2002. A defense of abortion (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boonin, D., 2019. Beyond Roe: Why abortion should be legal—even if the fetus is a person. Oxford University Press.
  • Crummett, D., 2020. Violinists, demandingness, and the impairment argument against abortion. Bioethics, 34 (2), 214–220.
  • Davis, M., 2003. What’s philosophically interesting about engineering ethics? Science and engineering ethics, 9 (3), 353–361.
  • Feinberg, J., 1978. Voluntary euthanasia and the inalienable right to life. Philosophy & public affairs, 7 (2), 93–123.
  • Fischer, J.M., 2013. Abortion and ownership. Journal of ethics: An international philosophical review, 17 (4), 275–304.
  • George, R.P., and Tollefsen, C., 2008. Embryo: A defense of human life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Hendricks, P., 2019a. Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument. Bioethics, 33 (2), 245–253.
  • Hendricks, P.C., 2019b. (Regrettably) abortion remains immoral: The impairment argument defended. Bioethics, 33, 968–969.
  • Hendricks, P., 2021. My body, not my choice: against legalised abortion. Journal of medical ethics, doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-107194.
  • Locke, J., 1980. Second treatise of government. Edited by C. B. Macpherson. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing.
  • Lovering, R., 2020. A moral argument for frozen human embryo adoption. Bioethics, 34 (3), 242–251.
  • Marquis, D., 1989. Why abortion is immoral. Journal of philosophy, 86 (4), 183–202.
  • Mulder, J., 2013. A short argument against abortion rights. Think, 12 (34), 57–68.
  • Noonan Jr., J.T., 1970. An almost absolute value in history. In: J. T. Noonan Jr., ed. The morality of abortion: legal and historical perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 51–59.
  • Ord, T., 2008. The scourge: moral implications of natural embryo loss. American Journal of Bioethics, 8, 12–19.
  • Pickard, C., 2020. Abortion is incommensurable with fetal alcohol syndrome. Bioethics, 34 (2), 207–210.
  • Plato, 1943. Plato's The republic. New York: Books, Inc.
  • Rachels, J., 1979. Killing and starving to death. Philosophy (London, England), 54 (208), 159–171. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3750071.
  • Räsänen, J., 2020. Against the impairment argument: a reply to hendricks. Bioethics, 34 (8), 862–864.
  • Shakespeare, William, 1564–1616. The merchant of venice. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman, 1994.
  • Simkulet, W., 2016a. A critique of henrik friberg-fernros’s defense of the substance view. Bioethics, 30, 767–773.
  • Simkulet, W., 2016b. Abortion, property, and liberty. Journal of ethics: An international philosophical review, 20 (4), 373–383.
  • Simkulet, W., 2021. On the impairment argument. Bioethics, 35 (5), 400–406.
  • Thomson, J.J., 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy and public affairs, 1 (1), 47–66.
  • Tooley, M., 1972. Abortion and infanticide. Philosophy and public affairs, 2 (1), 37–65.
  • Trammell, R.L., 1975. Saving life and taking life. Journal of philosophy, 72 (5), 13I–137.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.