Collapsing the labels ‘victim’ and ‘offender’ in the Victims’ Directive and the paradox of restorative justice

References

• Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 25, 1–127.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice & responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (1986). The ideal victim. In E. A. Fattah (ed.), From crime policy to victim policy (pp. 17–30). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, E. M. (2011). Security, with Care: Restorative justice and healthy societies. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2005). Some meta-theoretical questions for restorative justice. Ratio Juris, 18(1), 84–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00287.x
   Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2008). Restorative justice: the perplexing concept. Conceptual fault lines and power battles within the restorative justice movement. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8(2), 165–183. doi: 10.1177/1748895808088993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2011). Restorative practices: from the early societies to the 1970s. Internet Journal of Criminology ( Online). www.docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/b93dd4_b68b3e905ddb480695a6a7c703d13630.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2014). Bringing race relations into the restorative justice debate. Journal of Black Studies, 45(3), 216–246. doi: 10.1177/0021934714526042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2015a). Offenders no more: an interdisciplinary restorative justice dialogue. New York: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2015b). Repositioning restorative justice in Europe: the victims’ directive. Victims and Offenders Journal, 11(1), 71–86. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2015.1105342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2016). Addressing the paradox of restorative justice: the victims’ directive & the collapse of labels ‘victim’ & ‘offender’. Conference paper for Recalibrating victimhood: Restorative justice, victims’ rights and social transformation in the EU and Canada, at Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. www.researchgate.net/publication/307967478_Addressing_the_Paradox_of_Restorative_Justice_The_Victims%27_Directive_the_collapse_of_labels_victim_offender.
   Google Scholar
• Geis, G. (1977). Restitution by criminal offenders: a summary and overview. In J. Hudson & B. Galaway (eds.), Restitution in criminal justice (pp. 147–164). Lexington: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• IARS International Institute. (2016). The victim’s directive & the UK victim’s bill: safeguarding refugee and asylum-seeking women. London: IARS. www.iars.org.uk/sites/default/files/CR%20Policy%20briefing%20FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, D. R. & Frank, O. (2015). Anxiously awaiting the future of restorative justice in the United States. Victims and Offenders Journal, 11(1), 50–70. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2015.1107796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelin, J. (2015). How I became an offender and what I did to remove this label. In T. Gavrielides (ed.), Offenders no more: an interdisciplinary restorative justice dialogue (pp. 1–17). New York: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative justice: an overview. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Michalowski, R. (1985). Order, law and crime. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlich, G. (2005). Governing paradoxes of restorative justice. London: The Glasshouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossner, D. (1990). Wiedergutmachen statt übelvergelten. (Straf-)theoretische Begründung und Eingrenzung der Kriminalpolitischen Idee. In E. Marks & D. Roessner (eds.), Tater-Opfer-Ausgleich: vom zwischenmenschlichen Weg zur Wiederstellung des Rechtsfriedens (pp. 7–37). Bonn: Forum Verlag Godesberg.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, S. (1970). Victim compensation and responsibility. Southern California Law Review, 43, 55–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victims’ Commissioner. (2016). A question of quality: a review of restorative justice. London: Victims’ Commissioner’s Office.
   Google Scholar
• Weitekamp, E. (1999). The history of restorative justice. In L. Walgrave & G. Bazemore (eds.), Restorative juvenile justice: repairing the harm of youth crime (pp. 75–102). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: a new focus for crime and justice. Ontario: Herald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. & Mika, H. (1998). Fundamental concepts of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 1, 47–55.
   Google Scholar