What Pollock and Rothko may have announced and restorative justice may have to deal with: sovereign victim culture

References

• Bataille, G. (2001) [1957]. Eroticism. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bataille, G. (2012) [1954]. La souveraineté. Paris: Ligne.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2008). The art of fife. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Cernuschi, C. & Herczynski, A. (2008). The subversion of gravity in Jackson Pollock’s abstractions. The Art Bulletin, 90, 616–639. doi: 10.1080/00043079.2008.10786416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debord, G. (1967). La société du spectacle. Paris: Buchet-Chastel.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995) [1990]. Postscript on control societies. In G. Deleuze (ed.), Negotiations (pp. 177–182). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1997) [1994]. Essays critical and clinical. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2016). Repositioning restorative justice in Europe. Victims & Offenders, 11, 71–86. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2015.1105342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2017). The victims’ directive and what victims want from restorative justice. Victims & Offenders, 12, 21–42. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2014.982778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., Winlow, S. & Ancrum, C. (2005). Radgies, gangstas, and mugs: imaginary criminal identities in the twilight of the pseudo-pacification process. Social Justice, 1, 100–112.
   Google Scholar
• Houellebecq, M. (2010). Les particules elémentaires. Paris: J’ai Lu.
   Google Scholar
• Lauwaert, K. (2013). Restorative justice in the 2012 EU victims directive: a right to quality service, but no right to equal access for victims of crime? Restorative Justice: An International Journal, 1(3), 414–425. doi: 10.5235/20504721.1.3.414
   Google Scholar
• Lauwaert, K. (2015). About politics and rights. Restorative justice in the victims’ directive. In ACJRD (ed.), Victims in focus: European and domestic perspectives, Conference report (pp. 10–13). Dublin: Association for Criminal Justice Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Lauwaert, K. & Aertsen, I. (2016). Restorative justice and criminal justice systems in Europe. Minorigiustizia, 1, 24–32. doi: 10.3280/MG2016-001003
   Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2010). Law, code and late modern governance in prophetic painting: notes on Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko and Gilles Deleuze. In A. Wagner & J. Broekman (eds.), Prospects of legal semiotics (pp. 171–192). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2011a). Jackson Pollock’s flight from law and code: theses on responsive choice and the dawn of control society. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 24, 117–138. doi: 10.1007/s11196-010-9179-4
   Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2011b). Mystical sovereignty and the emergence of control society. In R. Lippens & J. Hardie-Bick (eds.), Crime, governance, and existential predicaments (pp. 175–193). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2012). Control over emergence: images of radical sovereignty in Pollock, Rothko and Rebeyrolle. Human Studies: International Journal for Philosophy and Social Sciences, 3, 351–364. doi: 10.1007/s10746-012-9237-x
   Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2015a). Ambivalent sovereigns and restorative justice. Exploring conditions of possibility and impossibility for restorative justice in a post-communicative age. Critical Criminology, 23, 125–139. doi: 10.1007/s10612-014-9259-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2015b). Absolutely sovereign victims. Rethinking the victim movement. Social Justice, 3, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2016). Sovereign minds, bodies and victim culture. In D. Spencer & S. Walklate (eds.), Reconceptualising critical victimology: interventions and possibilities (pp. 1–13). Lexington: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lippens, R. (2017). Control society, sovereign victim culture, and restorative justice. In I. Aertsen & B. Pali (eds.), Critical restorative justice (pp. 283–296). Oxford: Bloomsbury/Hart Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Maffesoli, M. (1996) [1988]. The times of the tribes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K. (2011). Restorative justice and ‘empowerment’: producing and governing active subjects through ‘empowering’ practices. Critical Criminology, 19, 91–105. doi: 10.1007/s10612-010-9106-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothko, M. (2006). Writings on art. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Camp, T. (2016). Understanding victim participation in restorative practices. Looking for justice for oneself as well as for others. European Journal of Criminology, first published 28 December 2016: doi: 10.1177/1477370816682981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Camp, T. & Wemmers, J.-A. (2015). Victims’ reflections on the protective and proactive approaches to the offer of restorative justice: the importance of information. Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice, 3, 415–442.
   Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. (1981). The aesthetics of disappearance. New York: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar